Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

[DrewVeenstra]

hey Mr. DrewVeenstra, are there any updates on the changes?

We're still working on it. The write-ups for the show are in the process of being updated, and the change still has to be formally proposed. I can guarantee that we'll be able to finish it before Born Again releases.

We're thinking the season spans something like November 2-December 15, 2014 by the way.

 

[selfishmisery]

Wait, Civil War is not on April 10th?

I gotta update my personal timeline then.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

An official source > a few trees

Man, what a difficult choice.

The film itself isn't an official source?

 

[SoyaCS]

The film itself isn't an official source?

A few trees aren't concrete evidence. Does it make it a possibility that it's a different season? Kinda? But it's not a without a doubt thing. And when we have an official source saying something different then the already uncertain piece of evidence, yeah I'll take the official source 11 out of 10 times.

 

[Rman]

We're still working on it. The write-ups for the show are in the process of being updated, and the change still has to be formally proposed. I can guarantee that we'll be able to finish it before Born Again releases.

We're thinking the season spans something like November 2-December 15, 2014 by the way.

Having recently rewatched the season, those dates sound good.

 

[Megatron]

We're still working on it. The write-ups for the show are in the process of being updated, and the change still has to be formally proposed. I can guarantee that we'll be able to finish it before Born Again releases.

We're thinking the season spans something like November 2-December 15, 2014 by the way.

btw the changes will be only about the present day events and the flashbacks about Daredevil's 1st nights on crime or all of season 1 will change? So like the flashbacks with fisk killing his father etc...

 

[iceman109]

The latest scandal of this thread: Treegate

 

[selfishmisery]

Is there a line or scene that confirms Black Panther and Black Widow are days after Civil War? Or a time jump at some point during the end of Civil War?

 

[iceman109]

At the beginning of Black Panther T'Challa is watching the news saying it's been two weeks since the explosion that killed is father

 

[selfishmisery]

At the beginning of Black Panther T'Challa is watching the news saying it's been two weeks since the explosion that killed is father

Black Panther is summer, correct?

According to the MCU book?

 

[Rman]

Black Panther is summer, correct?

According to the MCU book?

Yes, which is why I go with Civil War being mid-June since the timeline book still says it's Spring, Black Widow picks up right after and since the timeline book considers it Spring/Summer it's mid-late June, and then Black Panther which the book places in Summer is late June-early July.

 

[iceman109]

I don't have the book so I can't really speak on that

 

[Rman]

At the beginning of Black Panther T'Challa is watching the news saying it's been two weeks since the explosion that killed is father

Actually it's one week.

 

[selfishmisery]

Yes, which is why I go with Civil War being mid-June since the timeline book still says it's Spring, Black Widow picks up right after and since the timeline book considers it Spring/Summer it's mid-late June, and then Black Panther which the book places in Summer is late June-early July.

That kinda screws with the YFNS timeline in relation to the MCU, tbh.

 

[Rman]

That kinda fucks with the YFNS timeline in relation to the MCU, tbh.

I honestly doubt they put much thought into it. Strange got his powers earlier in this universe, so there's already discrepancies. To them it's vaguely around Spring 2016.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

A few trees aren't concrete evidence. Does it make it a possibility that it's a different season? Kinda? But it's not a without a doubt thing. And when we have an official source saying something different then the already uncertain piece of evidence, yeah I'll take the official source 11 out of 10 times.

And you are of course free to do that. My point is it's NOT settled. There is debate to be had.

 

[SoyaCS]

And you are of course free to do that. My point is it's NOT settled. There is debate to be had.

Except not really because one piece of evidence is embarisngly more likely than the other.

Again, the timelime book vs a handful of trees.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

Except not really because one piece of evidence is embarisngly more likely than the other.

Again, the timelime book vs a handful of trees.

In YOUR opinion. Again, the timeline book vs actual on-screen evidence.

 

[SoyaCS]

In YOUR opinion. Again, the timeline book vs actual on-screen evidence.

Except it's not really on screen evidence. It's weird but nothing solid. But do you know what is solid evidence.

 

[Starvel]

And you are of course free to do that. My point is it's NOT settled. There is debate to be had.

It is settled. As long as I'm editing the timeline official sources won't be ignored for a background detail that's flimsy and as Rman pointed out already been inconsistent in the past. If anyone truly has an issue with that they're more than welcome to take over the editing of this timeline