Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

Starvel said:
It is settled. As long as I'm editing the timeline official sources won't be ignored for a background detail that's flimsy and as Rman pointed out already been inconsistent in the past. If anyone truly has an issue with that they're more than welcome to take over the editing of this timeline
Click to expand...
You people take things so personally.
 
SoyaCS said:
Except it's not really on screen evidence. It's weird but nothing solid. But do you know what is solid evidence.
Click to expand...
You're wrong. It literally IS on-screen evidence. Anything you can visibly observe with your own two eyes by watching the film itself IS on-screen evidence. And it actually IS solid evidence. You are just choosing to ignore it because you trust a book more than what you watch in a movie.
 
Dallas Kinard said:
You're wrong. It literally IS on-screen evidence. Anything you can visibly observe with your own two eyes by watching the film itself IS on-screen evidence. And it actually IS solid evidence. You are just choosing to ignore it because you trust a book more than what you watch in a movie.
Click to expand...
Excpet leaves on a tree aren't solid evidence. Especially when more solid evidence contradicts it.
 
Starvel said:
How am I taking this personally exactly?
Click to expand...
This part is just ridiculous and very petty/emotional. "If anyone truly has an issue with that they're more than welcome to take over the editing of this timeline"

like relax bro. It's all fiction. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
 
SoyaCS said:
Yeah, a person. Not a member of whatever fantasy Illuminati you're coming up with in you're head in order to justify no one else agreeing with a few trees being the end all discussion of discoveries that you think it is.
Click to expand...
My claim is that the trees ARE evidence. "You people" are the individuals who are pushing back and appealing to authority (a book written by official sources). My claim is just as valid since the film itself is also an official source. We've all agreed that BOTH can be wrong so at this point it's up to the reader to decide for themselves which evidence to go with.
 
Dallas Kinard said:
This part is just ridiculous and very petty/emotional. "If anyone truly has an issue with that they're more than welcome to take over the editing of this timeline"

like relax bro. It's all fiction. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
Click to expand...
Fr dude? You're the only one who's constantly fighting this despite multiple voices saying you're incorrect. Sure it's you're opinion, but just because you want to believe something doesn't make it the best. And what I said is true, if you or anyone else feels so strongly about this or anything else you or they are more than welcome to take this timeline and edit it as you see fit and argue whatever the hell you want for as long as you want. But unless someone else wants to do this, then as long as I'm editing it this debate is well past over. You are now the only one continuing to say the same single point you have over and over and now starting to insult people over it.
 
Starvel said:
Fr dude? You're the only one who's constantly fighting this desire multiple voices saying you're incorrect. Sure it's you're opinion, but just because you want to believe something doesn't make it the best. And what I said is true, if you or anyone else feels so strongly about this or anything else you or they are more than welcome to take this timeline and edit it as you see fit and argue whatever the hell you want for as long as you want. But unless someone else wants to do this, then as long as I'm editing it this debate is well past over. You are now the only one continuing to say the same single point you have over and over and now starting to insult people over it.
Click to expand...
Anyone can go back and read through this thread to see how it all started and how it all evolved to this point. In fact, I've already received DM's about the pettiness on this thread, so I'm not surprised by any of this. I'm sharing what I believe it strong evidence that the film spans about a year of time. That's it. If you want to believe it, be my guest. If you don't, then don't. Nobody is forcing anyone to believe anything. But to ignore clear on-screen evidence from an official source because another official source contradicts it is just stupid.
 
Dallas Kinard said:
Anyone can go back and read through this thread to see how it all started and how it all evolved to this point. In fact, I've already received DM's about the pettiness on this thread, so I'm not surprised by any of this. I'm sharing what I believe it strong evidence that the film spans about a year of time. That's it. If you want to believe it, be my guest. If you don't, then don't. Nobody is forcing anyone to believe anything. But to ignore clear on-screen evidence from an official source because another official source contradicts it is just stupid.
Click to expand...
Using your "on-screen evidence", Black Panther should be February/March not June/July. The movie was shot around then and the weather shown in scenes like London and Seoul fit those dates better. Like I said weather alone isn't always concrete. Especially when the credit scene was done later in an area that doesn't have Fall weather that matches their original shoot. TBH, I think they did a fine enough job making that scene still look like it was reasonably November. Green foilage still exists, even in the Winter.
 
Dallas Kinard said:
Anyone can go back and read through this thread to see how it all started and how it all evolved to this point. In fact, I've already received DM's about the pettiness on this thread, so I'm not surprised by any of this. I'm sharing what I believe it strong evidence that the film spans about a year of time. That's it. If you want to believe it, be my guest. If you don't, then don't. Nobody is forcing anyone to believe anything. But to ignore clear on-screen evidence from an official source because another official source contradicts it is just stupid.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250212_165717_Slides.jpg
    Screenshot_20250212_165717_Slides.jpg
    79.1 KB · Views: 9
Dallas Kinard said:
Anyone can go back and read through this thread to see how it all started and how it all evolved to this point. In fact, I've already received DM's about the pettiness on this thread, so I'm not surprised by any of this. I'm sharing what I believe it strong evidence that the film spans about a year of time. That's it. If you want to believe it, be my guest. If you don't, then don't. Nobody is forcing anyone to believe anything. But to ignore clear on-screen evidence from an official source because another official source contradicts it is just stupid.
Click to expand...
Yes we know, we heard it, loud and clear over and over. You've made your single piece of evidence very obvious to all and have continued to argue that single point with no new evidence or argument for over 7 hours now. You've been told no it's not happening but you can think whatever you want about it. Your right this thread in the past year especially has increased in its pettiness and salt and sometimes honestly is a drag to be a part of which is why I'm more than happy to hand this timeline to anyone else that wants to accept it. Until then, you made your point, you were told no by many voices, continue to throw a fit and insult or accept that and move on it's up to you but people will react accordingly.
 
Rman said:
Using your "on-screen evidence", Black Panther should be February/March not June/July. The movie was shot around then and the weather shown in scenes like London and Seoul fit those dates better. Like I said weather alone isn't always concrete. Especially when the credit scene was done later in an area that doesn't have Fall weather that matches their original shoot. TBH, I think they did a fine enough job making that scene still look like it was reasonably November. Green foilage still exists, even in the Winter.
Click to expand...
Correct, isn't always. But in this case it very well could be. That's my point dude. And in NY, the only green trees in Winter are Evergreens. I live outside of Philly and the weather is the same here.
 
Starvel said:
Yes we know, we heard it, loud and clear over and over. You've made your single piece of evidence very obvious to all and have continued to argue that single point with no new evidence or argument for over 7 hours now. You've been told no it's not happening but you can think whatever you want about it. Your right this thread in the past year especially has increased in its pettiness and salt and sometimes honestly is a drag to be a part of which is why I'm more than happy to hand this timeline to anyone else that wants to accept it. Until then, you made your point, you were told no by many voices, continue to throw a fit and insult or accept that and move on it's up to you but people will react accordingly.
Click to expand...
You do realize that just because I'm alone in my views on this specific thread, doesn't mean I'm wrong right? Just because more people agree with something, doesn't make that something correct.
 
Starvel said:
Right here is the point you're making. With your evidence it "could be". With the timeline book it simply and plainly is placed.
Click to expand...
And that book could be wrong. You already conceded that official sources (the film itself) can be wrong, so why can't a book be wrong?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top