A great article about the ousting of Loeb and Alexander. Make sure that you read the last paragraph...
That's very interesting...It didn't say how many have been shot though. I wonder how much they tweak what Loeb and Alexander wrote.
A great article about the ousting of Loeb and Alexander. Make sure that you read the last paragraph...
A great article about the ousting of Loeb and Alexander. Make sure that you read the last paragraph...
Sylar was one my favorite villains ever and they just ruined him forever.
The best Heroes episode ever was "Homecoming"
I had chills when Sylar first appears and fights Peter.
Peter saves the cheerleader. Insane.
Every Peter-Sylar showdown after that seem to led to something epic that never happened.
"You're like me, I wonder how that works."
I think I'm going to give this show until the next 'volume' (Fugitives). The reason being that I'm thinking season 3 is them trying to undo season 2 (why?) and I don't think Loeb's influence will be gone for at least a month (how far ahead are the show's filmed?)
Hiro referenced Red Hulk?! COME ON, LOEB!
Despite the fact that DC distributes the Heroes comic stuff...
I don't like the Sylar-Elle thing cause it came out of nowhere with no hints to their past "relationship".
How are Hiro's powers not gone?
And were they trying to mimick the effect from Watchmen when Mr. Manhatten first starts to get his powers?
Another mediocre episode, I thought. Here's what I didn't like:
- Sylar has had Peter's ability all along? Stupid. Stupid, stupid, stupid. And not for the reason you think; I'm totally fine with that, in theory. But really, what would have been more interesting for his character arc: having to forego ever getting any new powers in order to truly become the "good guy" that he wants to be, thereby actually sacrificing something; or having the same ability that made Peter a walking plot hole and having to sacrifice absolutely nothing in order to have this ridiculous character switch? I think the former would have been more gratifying, but then we couldn't have the random Sylar and Elle pairing that the writers are shoving down our throats.
- The villains, besides Arthur Petrelli, are lame. Think of it this way: we have Flint and Knox, who were outsmarted by a powerless Peter (let that sink in a minute: outsmarted ... by Peter), Sylar is a double agent and lovey-dovey Elle will follow him wherever he goes, and Tracy couldn't even beat Mohinder when her life depended on it. I guess that's a little unfair; she's slightly more capable that the others - her character switch just makes no sense.
- Hiro's whole storyline. What purpose does it serve? I suppose we'll find out soon enough, but right now ... it's utterly pointless. Usutu had to be killed so we could see the exact same storyline played out with Hiro again? Ridiculous.
- The eclipse had NOTHING to do with their powers. This whole aspect of it is just headache inducing. Okay, so, they were all displaying powers before the eclipse in the first episode, so it had nothing to do with them getting their powers. And if it truly affected abilities, wouldn't Hiro have experienced some malfunctions when he went back to feudal Japan and witnessed the eclipse? Oh, wait, never mind, season two never happened.
- The end was retarded. Arthur Petrellie sittin' there drawin' a an eclipse, just to hammer home the point, in case you'd forgotten, that IT'S COMING!
Things I liked:
- Parkman's whole storyline was very good, and it was nice to see a more human side to Arthur; the best villains are the ones with dimension to them, and it was almost sweet the way he finally decided to let Angela go, even knowing that she would probably betray him again in the future. Although I'm getting tired of the constant references to Daphne's past; we don't need to be reminded of it every five minutes.
- Hiro's references to recent comic book events was fun. I haven't kept up with regular Marvel continuity in quite some time outside of Thor, so I don't know exactly what he was talking about when he said that Hulk was red, but other than that it was interesting (by the way, wasn't Spider-Man's revealing of his secret identity retconned recently? I don't know).
- Nathan once again proving why his character is about 100x more awesome than Peter just by virtue of the fact that he's not borderline mentally handicapped. His inherent distrust of his father was great, and added some much-needed tension, especially knowing that Arthur isn't above killing his son; for a moment there, I half expected Arthur to finish the job. It was a great scene.
Maya was a bull**** character, and I'm glad she's gone... Why on earth would she have been a decent choice for being "The One"?
You know what I think I've decided? Season Two had good ideas that followed what the series was supposed to be (except some things that were just utter bull****), but overall the problem wasn't that characters weren't acting in character or the plot seemed too forced, it just was kind of boring and mediocre in comparison to season one.
Goodwill said:And were they trying to mimick the effect from Watchmen when Mr. Manhatten first starts to get his powers?
Although... DiB? Work out when the first episode of Heroes took place. Then work out when this episode took place. Did those events yet happen in the Marvel universe? In Heroes land, it's not the end of 2008. It's more like mid-2007 or so. Might be funny if actually, this is wrong. Maybe Hiro teleported to the future! :lol:
Gold star bonus for the writers though: Who gave Claire over to HRG to protect?
Kaito Nakamura.
Good continuity and well done to them.