Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer discussion (spoilers!)

You know exactly what I mean and I don't appreciate it.
Like I said, you're post, where you posted, is fine. I quoted you, then changed to what I thought which would the same ****ing thing if I didn't have the quotes around. So there's nothing for you to be going on about.

I guess that proves which is better :roll: as I remember people saying that proved spider-man 3 was bad.
Rotten Tomatoes is the worst site in the history of ever.
 
Last edited:
Fact: Spider-man 3 disappointed many people.

Common Misconception: Spider-man 3 is a bad film.


Common Misconception: Fantastic Four 2 was a 'fun, enjoyable film' that 'was what it was.'

Fact: Fantastic Four 2 was a light-hearted, half-***ed children's movie that suffered from bad writing, acting, and characterization. Calling it 'fun, enjoyable' for 'what it was' is only assisting those who cite this as an example of how comic books lack any real weight as a credible medium for telling stories.
 
Last edited:
Like I said, you're post, where you posted, is fine. I quoted you, then changed to what I thought which would the same ****ing thing if I didn't have the quotes around. So there's nothing for you to be going on about.


Rotten Tomatoes is the worst site in the history of ever.

You changed MY quote to where it looked like I said it that way you wanted. You should have taken the quotes off and made it look like you said it so that there wouldn't be anything to go on about.


and with that i'm outta here for a while.
 
Fact: Spider-man 3 disappointed many people.

Common Misconception: Spider-man 3 is a bad film.


Common Misconception: Fantastic Four 2 was a 'fun, enjoyable film' that 'was what it was.'

Fact: Fantastic Four 2 was a light-hearted, half-***ed children's movie that suffered from bad writing, acting, and characterization. Calling it 'fun, enjoyable' for 'what it was' is only assisting those who cite this as an example of how comic books lack any real weight as a credible medium for telling stories.



Now that was nicely put and 100% true
 
You changed MY quote to where it looked like I said it that way you wanted. You should have taken the quotes off and made it look like you said it so that there wouldn't be anything to go on about.


and with that i'm outta here for a while.
And you're overreacting.
 
In the first one yes. In this one the lines they made him say were almost all cringe worthy. The actor was great in the part and does the best with what he had unfortunately what he had was a big lump of ****.

He looked good when "flame on!" but his dialogue same with most dialog in this film was almost Batman and Robin worthy

Are you really comparing this to Batman and Robin? You're just mad Venom was God awful in the movie. The only good part of it was Sandman and they messed that up by throwing Venom in and taking away his screen time.
 
Are you really comparing this to Batman and Robin? You're just mad Venom was God awful in the movie. The only good part of it was Sandman and they messed that up by throwing Venom in and taking away his screen time.

Not debating Spider-man 3 here as it's been debated in it's actual thread. But yes I am saying this is almost as bad as "Batman and robin" and "catwoman"
 
Not debating Spider-man 3 here as it's been debated in it's actual thread. But yes I am saying this is almost as bad as "Batman and robin" and "catwoman"

I'll get off of SM3 but I can't see how you think this is so bad. The main point of the movie is that they captured all of the spirits of the characters correctly. I think you went in wanting it to be bad so you think that going out of it.
 
Common Misconception: Fantastic Four 2 was a 'fun, enjoyable film' that 'was what it was.'

Fact: Fantastic Four 2 was a light-hearted, half-***ed children's movie that suffered from bad writing, acting, and characterization. Calling it 'fun, enjoyable' for 'what it was' is only assisting those who cite this as an example of how comic books lack any real weight as a credible medium for telling stories.

Common Misconception: That one's opinion is anything more than that: an opinion.

Fact: That the above statement of "fact" is not a fact, but an opinion.

Honestly, people trying to pass off their opinions as the one true "fact" is one of my all-time most annoying pet peeves.
 
Common Misconception: That one's opinion is anything more than that: an opinion.

Fact: That the above statement of "fact" is not a fact, but an opinion.

Honestly, people trying to pass off their opinions as the one true "fact" is one of my all-time most annoying pet peeves.

Hm. some rational thinking. wierd.
 
I think you went in wanting it to be bad so you think that going out of it.

I thought it would be bad yes. BUT after seeing people on here talk about how it was "better than x-men 3 or spider-man 3" I figured oh I was wrong , This might be a good film. I downloaded it and as it was downloading I was exited about watching it.

Them it was back to "This is horrible" with added Disappointment. This film has to be the worst superhero film since Hulk. Yes I hate superman returns but that is better than this crap.


Now for me to say that it must be bad as I really hate that film.
 
I thought it would be bad yes. BUT after seeing people on here talk about how it was "better than x-men 3 or spider-man 3" I figured oh I was wrong , This might be a good film. I downloaded it and as it was downloading I was exited about watching it.

Them it was back to "This is horrible" with added Disappointment. This film has to be the worst superhero film since Hulk. Yes I hate superman returns but that is better than this crap.


Now for me to say that it must be bad as I really hate that film.

See it in theaters. You have to be there to really capture the Silver Surfer's scenes. And I thought X-Men 3 was about the same as this.
 
This isn't better than X-Men 3. But it was better then Spider-Man 3 or SR. And Catwoman is so terrible, nothing will replace it. Nothing.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top