Ultimates 2 #8 Discussion (SPOILERS)

TheManWithoutFear said:
This traitor thing is so overcooked. Millar really let us down with all the hype and the delivery and what's even worse is the biggest possibility of who the traitor at this point is.... NONE OF THE ULTIMATES. Where do you guys get off blameing Tony? Because he's building a jet? Idiots. That's a nod to the Ultimate Quinjet coming up probably for Vol. 3. It's not because Tony has this big scheme to take over the world. They're doing a MIni on him why would they turn him into a bad guy? He's a rich guy who wants to set himself apart by helping the world.

Hawkeye being alive is fine with me. But there better be a good reason he's being kept alive.

Loki altered the tapes? Cop-Out.

Someone obviously set up Captain America and that's pretty much something we all figured since we saw this cover leaked. Although I really liked the characterization of Steve Rogers in this issue we still get NOTHING!

The issue was good but I'm not giving it any credit we should be further along in the story.
Where's Bass to yell at me for this?

2/5

I pretty much agree with you.

We've known about a traitor since #5 "The Passion". #6 "The Defenders" had us see the traitor in part. #7 "Wolf in the Fold" had the traitor do something since the Hulk outing. #8 "Born on the Fourth of July" had Captain America be seen as the traitor.

The story isn't moving slowly.

The issues are coming out too slowly.

Also - why are people stating that Cap isn't the traitor? Just because he said, "I dunno what you're talking about, Fury"? My God. The traitor may kill unarmed children but LIE?! Obviously, that's beyond the pale. :roll:

The problem is the question, "Who is the traitor?" and since April we still don't know with certainty. That's too much to ask from an audience. We should've had this issue last month. And it seems there's no Ultimates in December. Is there an Ultimates issue in October or November? I dunno. #8 was very nicely pitched, very exciting and tense, but instead of being an issue or chapter, it felt... it wasn't enough.

Why?

Because it was over-hyped. This is, in my opinion, a case where the quality of a story was actually harmed not by anything it did, but by the people producing it by hyping it up too much. We were promised a lot, and instead we get this thing which does not fully deliver on the promise. It's unfair. There should've been more certainty.

Regardless, it was a good issue if you ignore all the publicity around it. What's interesting is the parallel's between this issue and The Passion. It's exactly the same. The origin of the Ultimate under siege is completely re-written (no doubt, lending credence to the Loki theory) and we just don't know who to trust. The Ultimates is becoming a very troubling and sinister series, because we just don't know what's going on. Where's Ultron? Red Skull? Is Cap really the traitor? Hank must know for certain. When will Thor return? Is Hawkeye really dead? Just what was on the security tapes? Having all these questions is ironic considering how I've just been complaining that there's too much hype around the series.

As for "who is the traitor?" - well, I find it odd that Betty Ross would announce that "we cannot confirm or deny Cap's involvement". Why mention him at all? She wasn't asked specifically about Cap. Why say it? Well, I would think to make the traitor believe they're safe and to hopefully lure them out. But why choose Cap as a scapegoat? And why would Nick keep the facade in private with his troops? Too many plot holes for this to be really plausible.

But, I throw in the towel on speculation. I just cannot be bothered anymore. I've taken all the clues we can see, narrowed it down, and we've yet to get anything more concrete. So for me, I'm finished with speculating.

I agree with MWOF, the issue had problems. But all of them were publicity. Ignore the noise and look at what happened.

SHIELD kicked the crap out of Captain America and took him prisoner because according to all the evidence, he betrayed the team and killed Hawkeye's entire family because he's not really Captain America at all and never, ever has been, but an impersonator who was placed in ice so Stark would find him and bring him into the Ultimates.

That's a big, big, big thing to happen. Just because we were promised something else outside of the issue itself, shouldn't let us think "nothing happened". The story has progressed a great deal - just not in the way we were told it would.

hitchtonymistake7wj.jpg


Regarding Loki's appearance in "Born on the Fourth of July". Here, is Tony Stark and on his left, another Tony Stark. The moral? Sometimes Hitch draws the same face.

greatnick0hr.jpg


This is just a terrific panel. :D

hellascarybig6fk.jpg


Admit it. This would've scared the **** out of you.
 
Last edited:
Someone should send Marvel a ****ing calendar. They missed out a month. It's called "October".
 
I thought mine said "oh shi--" too...?

But that's besides the point... did Bass agree with me? :shock: *Turns around and looks at the casual guy in the corner with a green blazer and black hair who looks like Ultimate Scott Baio* Oh, that makes sense then.
 
Bass said:
What's interesting is the parallel's between this issue and The Passion. It's exactly the same.

Yeah, I noticed that too.

Bass said:
SHIELD kicked the crap out of Captain America and took him prisoner because according to all the evidence, he betrayed the team and killed Hawkeye's entire family because he's not really Captain America at all, but an impersonator.

It would help to know how he impersonated him - like, did he wear Cap's costume? Don't we already know of someone who does that?

That's a big, big, big thing to happen. Just because we were promised something else outside of the issue itself, shouldn't let us think "nothing happened". The story has progressed a great deal - just not in the way we were told it would.

Bass said:
This is just a terrific panel. :D

It really is. The one early on with jan saying, "Ah hell" or something like that was good too.
 
TheManWithoutFear said:
But that's besides the point... did Bass agree with me? :shock: *Turns around and looks at the casual guy in the corner with a green blazer and black hair who looks like Ultimate Scott Baio* Oh, that makes sense then.

:lol:

Also, Cap is saying "Nein" which is German for "No"...
 
Last edited:
UltimateE said:
It would help to know how he impersonated him - like, did he wear Cap's costume? Don't we already know of someone who does that?

Nono - I've edited it above - I mean we've never seen the real Cap except in flashbacks. This guy who we think is Cap, is an impersonator and has been since the first volume. If this is true - it is HUGE.
 
I'm not sure how I'd feel, but my point is - this is a HUGE revelation and we have to see how this plays out. This is a far WORSE thing to imagine than anything Fury mentioned in the annual. People are glossing over what was in this issue in favour of what was not (and rightly so - they were promised something else after all).
 
Bass said:
I'm not sure how I'd feel, but my point is - this is a HUGE revelation and we have to see how this plays out. This is a far WORSE thing to imagine than anything Fury mentioned in the annual. People are glossing over what was in this issue in favour of what was not (and rightly so - they were promised something else after all).

I dunno...they didn't empahsize it much and I'm not sure I can see them going back and revisiting it.
 
What?

They state they're going to beat the **** out of him until he reveals who put him in a costume and gave him his powers. It's gonna come up until they know for certain who put him up to this or they've got proof it isn't true.
 
Bass said:
Regarding Loki's appearance in "Born on the Fourth of July". Here, is Tony Stark and on his left, another Tony Stark. The moral? Sometimes Hitch draws the same face.


Where is Loki in Issue 8?

Anyways, I'm going to keep saying this:

Tony Stark's eye color has changed, and there HAS to be a reason for this.
 
marvelman said:
Where is Loki in Issue 8?

Anyways, I'm going to keep saying this:

Tony Stark's eye color has changed, and there HAS to be a reason for this.

If Cap is an Imposter, who did he know Bucky and Gail so well, and why has Bucky and Gail responded to him without confusion. And why would Cap speak the way he does, and rather hang out with old people than the rest of the team?

And where did Fury get this theory anyway? Why would he assume Captain America is an imposter? Because someone in a Captain America suit killed Hawk's family?

And as for Loki showing up everywhere as opposed to and extra Tony, the extra tony showed up once, the Loki-look alikes are showing up everywhere. There are just too many of them to be coincidence.
 
As far as the traitor, I'm tired of being jerked around. This issue could have been a 5/5 if they had shown something of the person/s acting behind the scenes. I think it's pretty clear that Cap. is no traitor. Unless, they decide to do some kind of mind control twist, which would make me stop reading anything by Millar.

I personally think that it was some kind of illusion that made Fury think that it was Cap. that killed Hawkeye's family. They don't show what Fury saw on his hidden camera, so you can't tell where the illusion took place. I have three theories.

1)The traitor went through the effort of taking the appearance of Cap., because s/he knew that there were hidden camera and needed to create the illusion of being caught off guard. This would imply that it was Ultron who used some kind of holographic tech to create the illusion. This would fit with the need to bring Hank into the fold. It couldn't have been a skrull, because skrull most "consume" someone in order to "become" someone.
2)The traitor altered the video after it entered the shield database. This implies that it is Tony, because he is the only one with the security access and the tech resources and skills to pull it off.
3)Loki is once more altering reality so that events of the past are remembered differently than they actually occurred and evidence is created to support the false memories. So, that when Fury look at the tape he sees Cap with the gun and starts feeling as though is makes no sense to trust that he really was Steve Rogers. This is basically a slightly different version of what happened to Thor. It's not very original but still feasible.

Here's my theory for if it really is Captain America who killed Hawkeye's family:

Captain America's body didn't really land in the North Atlantic and get frozen for sixty years. His body was recovered by a splinter group of Nazi leaders, both skrull and human, called Hydra who foresaw the impending downfall of Germany. After regenerating his damaged body they put him into stasis for use in later operations. For the next fifty-five years HYDRA acted in shadow. Never allowing their presence to be known to any world government and never revealing the true identity of their leaders to anyone. All the while, they remained totally independent from the Skrull Empire. As the years went on they followed Skrull operations on earth and when they discovered that the skrull empire was attempting, once again, to seize control of earth. Deciding that they must move toward the destruction of the Skrull empire on earth, they put Captain America back into play. Using Captain America and other operatives, they helped position the US government so that they were prepared to combat the impending attack by the Skrull Empire. After the skrull invasion was successfully averted HYDRA felt that they were now in a position to seize control of the US government by seizing control of SHIELD. As they continued to destabilize the Ultimates and SHIELD as a whole, they framed members of the Ultimates so that they could secretly position agents of HYDRA inside SHIELD.
 
I REALLY wanna see Tony Stark getting attacked next. I was tired of all the team-up fights in vol.2 but now i see the meaning of it all. Someone is taking The Ultimates down one by one by using them against themself. For the next issue we will se Natasha and Tony go down. Gonna be kickass. Their wedding rings might have some kinda lazer thing. I'm a dreamer :(
 
Ok, read the issue.
Decent enough, but it felt somewhat empty.
Having not gone through the whole thread yet, I'll ask a few questions.

Why didn't Fury want the Ultimates involved? They were all involved in the attack on Thor and the Hulk. Emotional attachments wouldn't really be a consideration.

This plane of Tony's, can't be innocent. If the Ultimates are being disassembled, then how could this be the work of someone else to bring down Tony?

Cap still doesn't strike me as a child killer, so were all of his emotional scenes just played for the cameras?

And on the topic of cameras, Hanks place would be bugged too. If Hank is such a security risk then why hasn't the conversation between Hank and the traitor been viewed yet? They have people on the job following him, even to the point of infiltrating a group before he himself joined.

And why on Earth did Fury tell Cap about the liaisons that Jan was having with Hank? Fury would tell Jan to stop, right, why use Cap as a middle-man?

Again, we see that Fury is the only one that knows about secret video footage that reveals the traitor.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top