Guijllons
Well-Known Member
Cool, that makes sense then.
MaxwellSmart said:Captain America's body didn't really land in the North Atlantic and get frozen for sixty years. His body was recovered by a splinter group of Nazi leaders, both skrull and human, called Hydra who foresaw the impending downfall of Germany. After regenerating his damaged body they put him into stasis for use in later operations. For the next fifty-five years HYDRA acted in shadow. Never allowing their presence to be known to any world government and never revealing the true identity of their leaders to anyone. All the while, they remained totally independent from the Skrull Empire. As the years went on they followed Skrull operations on earth and when they discovered that the skrull empire was attempting, once again, to seize control of earth. Deciding that they must move toward the destruction of the Skrull empire on earth, they put Captain America back into play. Using Captain America and other operatives, they helped position the US government so that they were prepared to combat the impending attack by the Skrull Empire. After the skrull invasion was successfully averted HYDRA felt that they were now in a position to seize control of the US government by seizing control of SHIELD. As they continued to destabilize the Ultimates and SHIELD as a whole, they framed members of the Ultimates so that they could secretly position agents of HYDRA inside SHIELD.
Guijllons said:Ok, read the issue.
Decent enough, but it felt somewhat empty.
Having not gone through the whole thread yet, I'll ask a few questions.
Why didn't Fury want the Ultimates involved? They were all involved in the attack on Thor and the Hulk. Emotional attachments wouldn't really be a consideration.
This plane of Tony's, can't be innocent. If the Ultimates are being disassembled, then how could this be the work of someone else to bring down Tony?
Cap still doesn't strike me as a child killer, so were all of his emotional scenes just played for the cameras?
And on the topic of cameras, Hanks place would be bugged too. If Hank is such a security risk then why hasn't the conversation between Hank and the traitor been viewed yet? They have people on the job following him, even to the point of infiltrating a group before he himself joined.
And why on Earth did Fury tell Cap about the liaisons that Jan was having with Hank? Fury would tell Jan to stop, right, why use Cap as a middle-man?
Again, we see that Fury is the only one that knows about secret video footage that reveals the traitor.
Guijllons said:Testing him? I doubt that.
And given the resources Fury has spent on Hank, those tapes would have been viewed before now. Sure of it.
Tape evidence seems to be Millar's deux ex machina, or is there some real unifying thing behind it. That's the point I'm getting at.
Shot in the dark, Ultron's based on 'Vision'. Not that that statement could really mean anything.
I don't know. But it does stand out as being odd. Fury playing games with the members of the Ultimates isn't the Fury we seem to know, that's all I'm saying.DIrishB said:Why? Why else would he tell him?
Hawkeye wasn't under surveillance.Yet Hawkeye's weren't until Fury ordered them examined at that specific point in time. They had a time of death to work on with that, in Hank's case they'd have to go through weeks or even months of camera footage.
Guijllons said:Hawkeye wasn't under surveillance.
Tenyuki said:Uh... yeah, he was. Why else would there be cameras around?
There is a difference between a security camera and having agents follow you around all day.Tenyuki said:Uh... yeah, he was. Why else would there be cameras around?
Guijllons said:Testing him? I doubt that.
I just don't see what Fury would gain from telling Cap about Jan and Hank. If Fury had told him, and Cap is the traitor, then he'd have effectively told him that he'd seen Cap going to visit Hank too. Unless the gloved person talking to Hank was actually Jan, then it could make some sense. But telling Cap to be sure of his loyalty or test his reaction doesn't seem very right.UltimateE said:I don't. He already clearly doesn't trust anyone, not even Cap, and this was evident before he even saw the tapes (Lieberman/Ults. 2 Annual - I thought it was pretty clear he was implying that death wouldn't be the only reason he'd need a Cap replacement).
SeAcoW said:Cap was surpriced and had no idea what Fury was talking about. He said so even.
Guijllons said:I just don't see what Fury would gain from telling Cap about Jan and Hank. If Fury had told him, and Cap is the traitor, then he'd have effectively told him that he'd seen Cap going to visit Hank too. Unless the gloved person talking to Hank was actually Jan, then it could make some sense. But telling Cap to be sure of his loyalty or test his reaction doesn't seem very right.
I was thinking exactly the same thing. I was toying with the idea of bringing it up but I couldn't really tell if it was the art or not. I mean, her boyfriend being accused of murdering a teammate or kinda pleased that part of the plan was fitting into place, hard to tell.Rawb said:Could just be the art but to me, Jan didn't look very shocked or even worried.