Shi_Vral
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
- Messages
- 78
Just be sure you bring $5 for the parking. :wink:
Shi_Vral said:Right, but who says the neural pathway is the wire instead of the cable?
Shi_Vral said:But, this, of course, is very off topic for this thread.
Shi_Vral said:Uhhh, every pathway on the internet is a cable, not a wire.
Shi_Vral said:I asked because he said so I was just trying to gauge if this is based off of these four issues, or some of Card's other writing as well.
Undiferentiated Neural Tissue is a precursor of stem cells. It gathers into globs called neurospheres which eventually turn into stem cells. So, spread throughout Tony's body are globs of cells that haven't made up thier minds (haha, get it) as to what they want to be. So, his brain is no bigger than anyone else's, he's just got stem cell factories all over his body. So, maybe the brain cancer is some of these stem cells growing, looking like cancer (because no one else has a body like Tony's) and so the doctor's tell him its a brain tumor, and he trusts them because their doctors.
I understand that a lot of people grew up with Iron Man being the way he was. That's great, good for you. My dad started collecting comics when he was a little kid. He had a copy of one of the first X-Men comics, but because it was before they made action figures, he cut the characters out like paper dolls, and played with those. I've read the old stories, I know and love the old stories. I read the Ultimate comics to get new stories. Seeing as how these are new characters, and there wasn't really any set story for any of them when the books started, I'm loving this NEW origin of Iron Man. I realise that the Iron Man you grew up with was a "normal" human being, and you're mad cause now Card has turned him into something else. Well, boo hoo. If it makes you so mad, DON'T READ IT. Don't buy it. Send Marvel letters. Send them the issues, asking for your money back. Do what ever you feel you need to do because you don't like it. But don't rain on my parade and call my ideas stupid because you don't agree with them.
When was it scientists discovered we regrow brain cells. It must have been in my lifetime (22 years) because I remember being told as a little kid not to do things because it kills brain cells, and they don't grow back. So, if it was 1970 when they were doing the experiments, why would they expect that. And that's why they were testing it on the monkey. Its not the growth of brain cells, its the fact that the brain cells were already growing back, and this sped up the process to such a degree that it was making the brain grow too big.
That's true. Cuz boy, do I remember watching some old ones that were just like that.DIrishB said:Given the nature of the experiment they should have had a pretty good idea of what was going to happen. Only in old sci-fi movies do the scientists do stuff "just because" to see what happens. Not to say experiments don't turn out unexpectedly, but almost never to that degree.
Shi_Vral said:Says who? Who made you guys God in terms of what can and can't be changed in the Ultimate Universe? You're upset with the changes, fine. That doesn't make them wrong. In fact, they've been printed, therefore, they're right. Also, the changes don't make Card a bad writer. People have said "It'd be good if it wasn't about Iron Man." Well, its not about "your" Iron Man. Its about Card's Iron Man, which seems to have passed some sort of OK from Marvel since they're still printing, and gave him the go ahead for a second series.
In fact, they've been printed, therefore, they're right.
Shi_Vral said:Well, if his brain grew, then his central cortex grew too, and so the distance is reduced to be the same, or even less because the neural pathways are bigger, and so the data can flow faster. Just like putting a 1Gbps network card in your computer on a very high speed connection (faster than cable, cause you're caped at 7Mbps) will make things come in faster, why wouldn't bigger neural pathways mean faster data transmition, and therefore faster response time in the brain?
Me too! Want some popcorn? Anything to drink?TheManWithoutFear said:HAHAHAHAHAHA!! I LOVE THIS THREAD HE'S TRYING TO RATIONALIZE THE WALKING BRAIN IDEA!!!!
Ok, you said so....TheManWithoutFear said:God... someone shoot me now.
I'd say draw a picture, but I doubt people would even understand THAT. :lol:DIrishB said:Don't know how to make it anymore clear.
icemastertron said:I'd say draw a picture, but I doubt people would even understand THAT. :lol:
Shi_Vral said:No, in my opinion, anything Marvel printed in a comic book is truth, at least in terms of the characters and such involved. In fact, that's your argument as well ("Card is f-ing things up because he's not looking at the 'truth' other writers wrote before him"). And yes, my ideas have been called stupid. I'm not saying Card's ideas, as I'm not him. I'm stating my interpretations of his ideas, and you're saying their stupid. So, you are saying my ideas are stupid.
Shi_Vral said:And in the first 4 issues of all the other ultimate books, the characters are fleshed out masterpieces of literary achivement? Sure, they're not the most original of character ideas, but they were what Card was given to write with. When exactly did Card say he didn't know anything about Iron Man? Because if it was before he started writing the book, then I dobut that he hasn't read at least some of the stories before he actually sat down and started writing. If it was after, then yes that was a bad move on someone's part. But I'm sorry, just because you don't like what he's done with a character you like, that doesn't make the book bad. Maybe his idea's aren't perfectly reasoned out or believable, but these are comics? What characters are 100% believable?
Shi_Vral said:And in the first 4 issues of all the other ultimate books, the characters are fleshed out masterpieces of literary achivement?
Sure, they're not the most original of character ideas, but they were what Card was given to write with. When exactly did Card say he didn't know anything about Iron Man? Because if it was before he started writing the book, then I dobut that he hasn't read at least some of the stories before he actually sat down and started writing.
If it was after, then yes that was a bad move on someone's part. But I'm sorry, just because you don't like what he's done with a character you like, that doesn't make the book bad. Maybe his idea's aren't perfectly reasoned out or believable, but these are comics? What characters are 100% believable?