Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

[Starvel]

Oh please we ALL put way more thought into this stuff than official sources do. Give me a break. This is literally the point of this entire forum, to think about this stuff to death and figure out what the producers don't care to.

That doesn't change the fact that when there's official word on something that doesn't make it any less official.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

Hasn't been wrong before.

How do you know? And now I'm the bad guy because I have a different opinion?

This may be more accurate.

 

[Rman]

Oh please we ALL put way more thought into this stuff than official sources do. Give me a break. This is literally the point of this entire forum, to think about this stuff to death and figure out what the producers don't care to.

And we do that when we're not given official answers like the book. It's an entirely different thing to want to argue with the source done by the people behind the movies.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

That doesn't change the fact that when there's official word on something that doesn't make it any less official.

Does on-screen evidence count as "official word" too?

 

[Dallas Kinard]

And we do that when we're not given official answers like the book. It's an entirely different thing to want to argue with the source done by the people behind the movies.

The film itself isn't official enough for ya?

 

[SoyaCS]

How do you know? And now I'm the bad guy because I have a different opinion?

This may be more accurate.

View attachment 3199

You're not the bad guy lol, I just thought I'd be funny. Also, we no reason to think the book has or is wrong. So, until it's without a doubt wrong, it trumps a couple trees.

 

[Starvel]

Does on-screen evidence count as "official word" too?

Yeah but it can be retconed and corrected. Remember that official timeline book that released after the movie and definitively gave it a placement? If you were right, that's the correction made.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

You're not the bad guy lol, I just thought I'd be funny. Also, we no reason to think the book has or is wrong. So, until it's without a doubt wrong, it trumps a couple trees.

I have no reason to believe those trees are wrong, so that on-screen evidence trumps a page in a tie-in book IMO.

 

[Rman]

The film itself isn't official enough for ya?

Not when people behind said film share what they believe. Like I said it could change in the future, but for now this is where they see things so we go off it.

 

[SoyaCS]

I have no reason to believe those trees are wrong, so that on-screen evidence trumps a page in a tie-in book IMO.

"I have no reasons to believe those trees are wrong"

This about sums it up

 

[Dallas Kinard]

Yeah but it can be retconed and corrected. Remember that official timeline book that released after the movie and definitively gave it a placement? If you were right, that's the correction made.

This all boils down to which official source you want to go with. How many times must this be stated? It's up for debate. This isn't a settled topic.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

Not when people behind said film share what they believe. Like I said it could change in the future, but for now this is where they see things so we go off it.

The same people made the film right? So are they contradicting themselves?

 

[Starvel]

This all boils down to which official source you want to go with. How many times must this be stated? It's up for debate. This isn't a settled topic.

For this timeline it is. People can debate the same point as long as they want. That doesn't mean it isn't over, it just means they're stubborn.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

"I have no reasons to believe those trees are wrong"

This about sums it up

Yep. We are equal. You believe the book, I believe the movie.

 

[SoyaCS]

This all boils down to which official source you want to go with. How many times must this be stated? It's up for debate. This isn't a settled topic.

Except for that debate is useless on this thread. A decision has been made, deal with it.

 

[Starvel]

The same people made the film right? So are they contradicting themselves?

Yes, that's what a retcon is. And when more recent information comes out to correct old information that makes it more correct 9/10 times.

 

[Dallas Kinard]

For this timeline it is. People can debate the same point as long as they want. That doesn't mean it isn't over, it just means they're stubborn.

Translation: "In our opinion".

 

[Dallas Kinard]

Yes, that's what a retcon is. And when more recent information comes out to correct old information that makes it more correct 9/10 times.

But the information already exists. Watch the movie lol

 

[Dallas Kinard]

Except for that debate is useless on this thread. A decision has been made, deal with it.

Nah, I have my own timeline that my family and I use to watch the films chronologically. I'm going with the evidence I can see on this one and I'm calling the book wrong UNTIL further evidence dis-proves me. You can't make me "deal with" anything lol

 

[Starvel]

Translation: "In our opinion".

Yes, in my opinion, the person editing the timeline, you and your opinions are not above a recent official source

But the information already exists. Watch the movie lol

Did you not get the first sentence about what a retcon is? It's when something that is canon it's retroactively changed.