Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 2)

bgr.com

We finally know how Ms. Marvel fits in the MCU timeline

Where is Ms. Marvel on the MCU timeline? We think we already have the answer to that question from the show's episode 1.
bgr.com bgr.com

Disney's press tour revealed the first big detail about the Ms. Marvel timeline. It came from Ms. Marvel writer and producer Sana Amanat, who said the show takes place "one to two years" after Endgame:

So, I think right now, we haven't put an official number on how many years have gone by since Endgame. I cannot tell you off the top of my head because I would butcher it. I feel like it's one to two years [after Avengers: Endgame], something like that, but I don't actually remember [specifically]. But we do have that in our timeline.
Click to expand...
If that's not enough, we have the Disney Plus chronological timeline for the MCU. In there, Ms. Marvel comes after Moon Knight and Hawkeye.
Click to expand...
 
selfishmisery said:
bgr.com

We finally know how Ms. Marvel fits in the MCU timeline

Where is Ms. Marvel on the MCU timeline? We think we already have the answer to that question from the show's episode 1.
bgr.com bgr.com
Click to expand...
Yes I understand that the Ms. Marvel show takes place in 2025. But absolutely nothing says the post-credit scene does and that's the only thing relevant. Especially since we now know that scene is in The Marvels there's nothing that says that has to be 2025, I'd be surprised if it was even filmed as part of Ms. Marvel. Ant-Man happens in 2015, we moving Civil War there now too?
 
Starvel said:
Yes I understand that the Ms. Marvel show takes place in 2025. But absolutely nothing says the post-credit scene does and that's the only thing relevant. Especially since we now know that scene is in The Marvels there's nothing that says that has to be 2025. Ant-Man happens in 2015, we moving Civil War there now too?
Click to expand...
There's no "One Year Later" or anything to distinguish Ms. Marvel's post credit scene from another work outside of it besides later info that clarifies this is included in The Marvels. It's filmed and written like something that totally fits within the show. However in Ant-Man's Civil War scene there is a clear time jump by the out-of-context and vastly different scene they chose in relation to Ant-Man (the movie). It's narratively different for a clear time-jump related reason.

This is the issue I have right now with discussing timeline stuff TBH. We're both deadset on different years. But I'm perfectly willing to wait and see but the other side it's like "2026 or bust". I think if we change its placement entirely right now and then The Marvels comes out and Kamala says "Oh I learned I was a mutant a few weeks ago" - then we're basically undoing a recent mistake. Extra work for nothing other than confusing people's viewing order inbetween the waiting time.

Constantly rearranging is what I try to avoid and even if it's wrong in the first place, at least it's only one change instead of two when the answer is finally given.
If only because the reasons we base this on right now aren't founded in truth and more-so assumption a lot of the time, and leaving it as is creates less headaches.
 
Last edited:
selfishmisery said:
There's no "One Year Later" or anything to distinguish Ms. Marvel's post credit scene from another work outside of it besides later info that clarifies this is included in The Marvels. It's filmed and written like something that totally fits within the show. However in Ant-Man's Civil War scene there is a clear time jump by the out-of-context and vastly different scene they chose in relation to Ant-Man (the movie). It's narratively different for a clear time-jump related reason.

This is the issue I have right now with discussing timeline stuff TBH. We're both deadset on different years. But I'm perfectly willing to wait and see but the other side it's like "2026 or bust". I think if we change its placement entirely right now and then The Marvels comes out and Kamala says "Oh I learned I was a mutant a few weeks ago" - then we're basically undoing a recent mistake. Extra work for nothing other than confusing people's viewing order inbetween the waiting time.

Constantly rearranging is what I try to avoid and even if it's wrong in the first place, at least it's only one change instead of two when the answer is finally given.
If only because the reasons we base this on right now aren't founded in truth and more-so assumption a lot of the time, and leaving it as is creates less headaches.
Click to expand...
I'm not "deadset" like I said 2026 is my default placement. I'm fine with either one cause it doesn't make a huge difference either way, I just think that we need a placeholder and making that placeholder based on a post-credit scene, particularly one that's just a scene from an unreleased film, to be more unreliable than following a default placement. Either case has a chance of rearranging and we have to be open to rearranging with a franchise like the MCU, trying to avoid it is unnecessary when a fair amount of projects placements come from other installments after their release. An assumption for Secret Invasion's placement was made based on a post-credit scene (arguably the scenes easiest to place inaccurately). If litterally anything suggested that scene happened mere months after Ms. Marvel I'd be with you but everything that has 2025 is an assumption, everything for 2026 is just what we have from out of universe sources. Both easily overridden later but until later I find actual out of universe sources to be the way to go over just assuming The Marvels is 2025 cause it had a scene as Ms. Marvel's post-credit scene and I'm sorry but saying that scene is "firmly" 2025 is very laughable. It's a barely educated guess at best
 
Starvel said:
I'm not "deadset" like I said 2026 is my default placement. I'm fine with either one cause it doesn't make a huge difference either way, I just think that we need a placeholder and making that placeholder based on a post-credit scene, particularly one that's just a scene from an unreleased film, to be more unreliable than following a default placement. Either case has a chance of rearranging and we have to be open to rearranging with a franchise like the MCU, trying to avoid it is unnecessary when a fair amount of projects placements come from other installments after their release. An assumption for Secret Invasion's placement was made based on a post-credit scene (arguably the scenes easiest to place inaccurately). If litterally anything suggested that scene happened mere months after Ms. Marvel I'd be with you but everything that has 2025 is an assumption, everything for 2026 is just what we have from out of universe sources. Both easily overridden later but until later I find actual out of universe sources to be the way to go over just assuming The Marvels is 2025 cause it had a scene as Ms. Marvel's post-credit scene.
Click to expand...
I'm not "deadset" against 2025 either if we did get more evidence, but at the moment I feel like Secret Invasion works better in 2026. The Marvels is releasing over a year after Ms. Marvel and I don't see why it would be hard to believe that the in-universe passage of time is similar.
 
Starvel said:
I'm not "deadset" like I said 2026 is my default placement. I'm fine with either one cause it doesn't make a huge difference either way, I just think that we need a placeholder and making that placeholder based on a post-credit scene, particularly one that's just a scene from an unreleased film, to be more unreliable than following a default placement. Either case has a chance of rearranging and we have to be open to rearranging with a franchise like the MCU, trying to avoid it is unnecessary when a fair amount of projects placements come from other installments after their release. An assumption for Secret Invasion's placement was made based on a post-credit scene (arguably the scenes easiest to place inaccurately). If litterally anything suggested that scene happened mere months after Ms. Marvel I'd be with you but everything that has 2025 is an assumption, everything for 2026 is just what we have from out of universe sources. Both easily overridden later but until later I find actual out of universe sources to be the way to go over just assuming The Marvels is 2025 cause it had a scene as Ms. Marvel's post-credit scene and I'm sorry but saying that scene is "firmly" 2025 is very laughable. It's a barely educated guess at best
Click to expand...
Let's agree to disagree then entirely.

But let's be clear: None of us are correct. We're both giving our side and our opinion towards the matter. So I would suggest not adding the dogmatic "But my way seems to more objective than your's based on-" because all that does is get this conversation heated.
 
selfishmisery said:
Let's agree to disagree then entirely.

But let's be clear: None of us are correct. We're both giving our side and our opinion towards the matter. So I would suggest not adding the dogmatic "But my way seems to more objective than your's based on-" because all that does is get this conversation heated.
Click to expand...
I'm guilty of this too btw. I'm throwing this out there as just something for me to avoid as well.

Again, this is why I try to avoid discussions because past personal experiences haven't been kind. (I've gotten doxxed by someone in the past for a similar, civilized discussion regarding comic book stuff. They literally went after me and a family member.) Ultimately a habit I'm not prepared for emotionally and I'll probably just keep it to myself.
 
Hopefully, The Marvels is able to clear everything up. I know the Disney + timeline isn't perfect, but to place Secret Invasion and therefore The Marvels after the Guardians Holiday Special, Vol 3., and Quantumania if there was such a short time in between the three projects would be a major blunder.
 
Hey, there is some rule about flashbacks needing to be more than 3 seconds long to be included in the timeline? Because I have noticed that some very 1-2 second long flashbacks in Iron Man 3 are missing and there are also very brief flashbacks to Zola experimentation with Bucky in Winter Soldier that are missing.
 
Jozaca said:
Hey, there is some rule about flashbacks needing to be more than 3 seconds long to be included in the timeline? Because I have noticed that some very 1-2 second long flashbacks in Iron Man 3 are missing and there are also very brief flashbacks to Zola experimentation with Bucky in Winter Soldier that are missing.
Click to expand...
Timestamps?
 
selfishmisery said:
Let's agree to disagree then entirely.

But let's be clear: None of us are correct. We're both giving our side and our opinion towards the matter. So I would suggest not adding the dogmatic "But my way seems to more objective than your's based on-" because all that does is get this conversation heated.
Click to expand...
This is part of the reason why I go by what is actually in the movie/show first before everything else. Right or wrong, it is what we are presented with as viewers. Consider the 'before times' when we had nothing like D+, and we had to pick them clean with a fine tooth comb.

To that end, I also tend to use other parts of the MCU as a reasoning to justify or cast doubt on opinions that sometimes come across here. Take the post credits of Ms. Marvel for example. The suggestion that Marvels and Ms Marvel happen close together because of that scene can only really be inferred by say Coulson finding the hammer in Iron Man 2, or Bucky regaining his mind at the end of Ant-Man. Then again, you also have the original Captain Marvel film with a post credits scene happening 23 years later, or Yelena visiting a grave AT LEAST 7 years after the Black Widow film. Or WV with a post credits that could have occurred up to a year later. So the post credits to me is always up in the air until we get the answer to its call, if that makes sense.

But back to 2025/2026. Civil War is probably one of the best films to establish dates in the MCU because it covers so damn many of them with exact numbers. "in the 8 years since Mr Stark announced himself as Iron Man", is one such example. That logic is partly why I think Eternals is 2023 and not 2024 because Ajak says "5 Years" when referring to the snap. I know there is other evidence, I'm simply drawing a line of logic here.

Truth is, we won't know 100% until Marvels comes out and hopefully gives us some more definitive information. If not...then we have to hope the book does.
 
fuzzyfoot said:
Speaking of the book, has ANYTHING from it leaked yet at all that we can use to solidify things on the timeline?
Click to expand...
Preview pages confirm Iron Man begins in Early 2008 and "I Am Iron Man" is Spring of 2008. It also shows a timeline for Hulk placing the fight with Abomination and therefore Fury's Big Week in 2010. There are also pages for Age of Ultron confirming Spring 2015. So far, the only divergence from here is Fury's Big Week.
 
Rman said:
Preview pages confirm Iron Man begins in Early 2008 and "I Am Iron Man" is Spring of 2008. It also shows a timeline for Hulk placing the fight with Abomination and therefore Fury's Big Week in 2010. There are also pages for Age of Ultron confirming Spring 2015. So far, the only divergence from here is Fury's Big Week.
Click to expand...
Found the pages you were referring to, and an interesting note in there is that the HULK spread at least covers through the end of She-Hulk as it mentions Hulk finds Skaar. But that same paragraph essentially places the show 2024-2025, including the accident. Hopefully it explores that show in greater detail in the book but we have She-Hulk occurring entirely in 2025.

Also I am happy to see its a 344 page book.
 
fuzzyfoot said:
Found the pages you were referring to, and an interesting note in there is that the HULK spread at least covers through the end of She-Hulk as it mentions Hulk finds Skaar. But that same paragraph essentially places the show 2024-2025, including the accident. Hopefully it explores that show in greater detail in the book but we have She-Hulk occurring entirely in 2025.

Also I am happy to see its a 344 page book.
Click to expand...
I think the accident may be considered in 2024 and even then it'd be towards the end of the year. It'll be interesting to see how detailed the book gets. Stuff like Age of Ultron being just Spring I get, But I feel like they can easily place TBONY on May 4th, 2012 given all the evidence. I'm also hoping they break Fury's Big Week down by the day.
 
For Winter Soldier:
(1:27:23-1:27:25) has Zola saying "Sergeant Barnes" in a forest (I think is supposed to be him finding Bucky after he falls? But he was arrested after the train scene, so Bucky should have been lying in the snow for long if that has to be the case)
(1:27:30-1:27:46) has different moments from Bucky to Winter Soldier transformation
 
Rman said:
I think the accident may be considered in 2024 and even then it'd be towards the end of the year. It'll be interesting to see how detailed the book gets. Stuff like Age of Ultron being just Spring I get, But I feel like they can easily place TBONY on May 4th, 2012 given all the evidence. I'm also hoping they break Fury's Big Week down by the day.
Click to expand...
Same, though it won't change HOW I watch that part of the MCU, I am really curious how they will lay Iron Man 2, Thor, and TIH out for us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top