Respectfully - and I mean that - I think you guys who are arguing "against registration" are thinking in "comic universe" terms, not real world terms ... and that is fine, except that my beef with CIVIL WAR is that it seems to be challenging us to "really" think about the issues, to take them seriously.. and if we do, I feel that this isn't even a tough question. I will try not to repeat my earlier post too much, but...
"Fantasy" vigilantes can be fun. I certainly enjoy them - pretty much any of us still reading comic books does. *S* They make for great escapist fare, they draw on a long tradition of heroes operating "outside the law", and in some ways, stories involving them satisfy a very basic and largely laudable appetite to "see justice done".
But when you start "thinking about it seriously", the fun becomes a lot more problematic.
In many ways, the Marvel Universe makes things too easy for the anti-registration crowd, even after showing us the Nitro-caused tragedy at the school, which kicked off the series. The reason I say that is the Marvel Universe is populated with mostly admirable hero-types. In the Marvel universe - supervillains aside! - MOST of the people who don masks are "good" people. The Punisher stands out precisely because he ISN'T a "nice guy" (that is his "hook"). Same thing, in a different way, with Wolverine. So when Cap argues that heroes can police their own, etc, it seems reasonable. After all, MOST Marvel heroes are pretty well behaved. Mostly. But in "reality" - who would decide what is "reasonable"?
Dangling a "thug" (in your opinion) off a skyscraper, threatening to drop him, if he doesn't spill his guts? Looks pretty cool in a comic book. Until you imagine that "thug" being your Dad. Or son. And guess what? The hero has made a mistake - the guy being dangled is NOT a thug and doesn't know a thing. What are you going to do about it? Pick up the phone and call the Captain America hotline and ask him to look into it?
Or like I said in that earlier post... some dim bulb in a mask, who frankly takes a bit TOO much pleasure out of busting heads... kicks YOUR door in at two in the morning, and roughs YOU up a bit in front of your terrified family, because you work for XYZ Corp, which is (unbeknownst to you) owned by Villain X, about a zillion corporate levels up, and Captain Brutality thinks you know about some business transactions which are shady. He couldn't even SPELL "search warrant", has never even heard of probable cause, or due process. Sound cool? Fun?
Or a car full of young African American men gets stopped by Racist-Man and his superpowered buddies. Just because. Hmmmm.
Or just take the incident that kicked off CIVIL WAR, as presented, and really THINK about it. But take superheroes out of the picture, and imagine that cops were involved. Staged a clumsy attack in a residential neighborhood. Let a firefight spill out onto the streets, right by an elementary school. Pursued a heavily armed criminal, with heavy explosives, basically right into a schoolyard. And as a result, a bunch of kids ended up dead. Think heads wouldn't roll? Well, in the Marvel Universe, you can get into that kind of a situation, easily - it happens almost every issue of every comic! - with NO training, NO badge, NO accountability, NO legal boundaries ... YOU just decide what is right, what is wrong, based on YOUR personal code. You decide when to turn the streets into a free fire zone.
Imagine if this was the law... not only no "gun control", but anyone, at any time, could carry and use any weapon they saw fit, in any place, based on their own personal values. That is essentially the Marvel Universe. Forget metal detectors and worrying about box cutters and nail files... all sorts of people walking around, who don't NEED guns, because they can put their fists through steel, read your mind or mind control you, point at you and set you on fire, or freeze you solid, or make your blood boil, or any of a million other nasty things, and the only real restriction on them is ...their conscience.
Sound like a good way to live?
Don't mean to make this unduly "heavy". Just saying -- the CIVIL WAR series is, to me, based on a really strange premise. By putting laudable characters on the anti-registration side (and yes, there are laudable characters on the pro-registration side, for sure), they seem to want to suggest that there is a good case to be made for throwing out the rule of law and embracing vigilantes. Really?
Shadow
PS - Take the incident in CIVIL WAR #2... the book opens with the Vulture and the Grim Reaper beaten up and chained. Bloody noses, teeth missing, etc. We are to assume those happened in a fair fight and not AFTER they were chained - probably. Now what? Going to "arrest" these guys? On whose say so? On what evidence? Are they going to trial? Who is going to tesitfy? Do "heroes" just go around beating people up and leaving them for the authorities to find? And what are those authorities supposed to do THEN?
PPS - Lets see if the CIVIL WAR authors take another logical step. I would guess that almost EVERY supervillain would OPPOSE registration. Wonder if they will show that, and get into it... if only from a public relations stand point, if nothing else... when "Cap's side" has to deal with endorsements from the supervillain crowd. *S* Heck, how is Cap, springing prisoners, assaulting SHIELD agents, and endangering cops, any different from Magneto? A different agenda, sure, but...