X-Men Origins: Wolverine discussion (Spoilers!)

How would you rate X-Men Origins: Wolverine

  • Total voters
    19
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

skotti-chan said:
more accurately, he's like a knight errant, questing to find his original love. Not really trying to bang every ginger ever born, more like trying to find a "reincarnation" of Rose.




But, that's coming from how a very romantic minded chick interpreted Origins.
Click to expand...

I'm kinda upset their not doing that. But again they wanted silver fox since she's a bigger part to old school fans and will focus only his later life with weapon x more.
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

Random said:
I'm kinda upset their not doing that. But again they wanted silver fox since she's a bigger part to old school fans and will focus only his later life with weapon x more.
Click to expand...

Of course Wolverine has had many love interest over the decades.
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

As much as I want Rose, she wouldn't have the time needed to really develop her character and I really don't need her to be in the background, recognizable to only those in the know.
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

Cyclops? seriously? bah

why do they keep showing that bit with the helicopter, it wasn't that impressive the first time they showed it
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

thee great one said:
As much as I want Rose, she wouldn't have the time needed to really develop her character and I really don't need her to be in the background, recognizable to only those in the know.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I agree, and after rereading Origins, the whole story is told from her PoV, which wouldn't really work in Wolverine's movie.

So I'm not all that upset that she's not in it, kinda annoyed tho that there's no evidence of Mystique, who had a friggen son with Sabertooth for crap's sake.
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

skotti-chan said:
Yeah, I agree, and after rereading Origins, the whole story is told from her PoV, which wouldn't really work in Wolverine's movie.

So I'm not all that upset that she's not in it, kinda annoyed tho that there's no evidence of Mystique, who had a friggen son with Sabertooth for crap's sake.
Click to expand...

I've had enough of Mystique, the X-movies killed her for me
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

This is a prequel to the X-men films. Why in the teasers and trailers does all the technology seem modern? Shouldn't everything feel older than it did in the X-men films instead it seems like everything is newer.
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

SSJmole said:
This is a prequel to the X-men films. Why in the teasers and trailers does all the technology seem modern? Shouldn't everything feel older than it did in the X-men films instead it seems like everything is newer.
Click to expand...
Stryker said in X2 that it was only 15 years since the operation with Wolverine.
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

Ice said:
Stryker said in X2 that it was only 15 years since the operation with Wolverine.
Click to expand...

and the flash backs seem to be pretty consistent with what was shown in the other X movies

something like weapon x would have had to be particularily cutting
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

Ice said:
Stryker said in X2 that it was only 15 years since the operation with Wolverine.
Click to expand...

Yes and 15 years before 2003 is 1988. So shouldn't things look more like they were on Die Hard whih came out 1988 not look like Die hard 4?
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

SSJmole said:
This is a prequel to the X-men films. Why in the teasers and trailers does all the technology seem modern? Shouldn't everything feel older than it did in the X-men films instead it seems like everything is newer.
Click to expand...

Remember how it said in the first X-Men where it said it was set in the not to distant future? This is probably set in the present considering that timeline set up.
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

SSJmole said:
Yes and 15 years before 2003 is 1988. So shouldn't things look more like they were on Die Hard whih came out 1988 not look like Die hard 4?
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. For one, two different movies. Die Hard is more in tune with reality where this is a comic book movie.

And who's to say the timeline in the movie is '03 anyways? :wink:

:p
 
Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine News.

bluebeast said:
Remember how it said in the first X-Men where it said it was set in the not to distant future? This is probably set in the present considering that timeline set up.
Click to expand...

But in X-men III when they flashed back to young Jean (20 years) things seemed to feel older. This = 15 and yet is as new? It makes little sense.


Ice said:
Not necessarily. For one, two different movies. Die Hard is more in tune with reality where this is a comic book movie.

And who's to say the timeline in the movie is '03 anyways? :wink:

:p
Click to expand...


True and maybe I'm nit picking. I'm still exited for it and am not saying this movie will be bad. It's a little thing that bugs me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top