X-Men Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Revised & Original)

selfishmisery said:
@BB10 I assume you're a wiki guy. Maybe bring this whole "WW1076" and "L1130" potential Earth numbers thing up to the people at the Marvel wiki?
Click to expand...
I think those numbers probably mean that the movie Wade Wilson is the 1076th Deadpool and TV Show Loki the 1130th Loki to be pruned.

"10005 Revised" should be changed back to TRN414 since it's no different than 19999 being called 616 in the movies. Marvel Wiki should prioritise the perspective of the greater Multiverse instead of just the MCU multiverse. It's unlikely that TRN414 would have been designated 10005 by the classic/handbook multiverse rules.
 
BB10 said:
I think those numbers probably mean that the movie Wade Wilson is the 1076th Deadpool and TV Show Loki the 1130th Loki to be pruned.

"10005 Revised" should be changed back to TRN414 since it's no different than 19999 being called 616 in the movies. Marvel Wiki should prioritise the perspective of the greater Multiverse instead of just the MCU multiverse. It's unlikely that TRN414 would have been designated 10005 by the classic/handbook multiverse rules.
Click to expand...
Then why are there much less Deadpools in the Corps than expected?
Also there's also Lokis named L1247 and L6792, which means that the TVA continued pruning them
Mobius' file, meanwhile, has him as M-FF353, which, while a reference to the issue he debuted in, doesn't mean he's the 353rd Mobius to be recruited to the TVA
 
BB10 said:
I think those numbers probably mean that the movie Wade Wilson is the 1076th Deadpool and TV Show Loki the 1130th Loki to be pruned.

"10005 Revised" should be changed back to TRN414 since it's no different than 19999 being called 616 in the movies. Marvel Wiki should prioritise the perspective of the greater Multiverse instead of just the MCU multiverse. It's unlikely that TRN414 would have been designated 10005 by the classic/handbook multiverse rules.
Click to expand...
Yeah that makes sense. Just another mystery that should have been answered in Deadpool 3 but more questions arose.
 
BB10 said:
I think those numbers probably mean that the movie Wade Wilson is the 1076th Deadpool and TV Show Loki the 1130th Loki to be pruned.

"10005 Revised" should be changed back to TRN414 since it's no different than 19999 being called 616 in the movies. Marvel Wiki should prioritise the perspective of the greater Multiverse instead of just the MCU multiverse. It's unlikely that TRN414 would have been designated 10005 by the classic/handbook multiverse rules.
Click to expand...
Thinking about it, the original Days of Future Past timeline from 1973 to 2023 should probably be a TRN? Not the other way around?
 
selfishmisery said:
Thinking about it, the original Days of Future Past timeline from 1973 to 2023 should probably be a TRN? Not the other way around?
Click to expand...
But the original timeline is the actual 10005.

I suppose one COULD say 10005 has been retconned into the post-DOFP timeline and that the OG one would require a new designation, but IDK.
 
BB10 said:
But the original timeline is the actual 10005.

I suppose one COULD say 10005 has been retconned into the post-DOFP timeline and that the OG one would require a new designation, but IDK.
Click to expand...
I was comparing it to Deadpool 2's timeline and how it becoming undone essentially reverts back to its base timeline while the secluded alternate timeline events branch out or are erased. That's what made me think "Oh, the Sentinel timeline from 1973 to 2023 isn't(?) Earth-10005?"
 
selfishmisery said:
I was comparing it to Deadpool 2's timeline and how it becoming undone essentially reverts back to its base timeline while the secluded alternate timeline events branch out or are erased. That's what made me think "Oh, the Sentinel timeline from 1973 to 2023 isn't(?) Earth-10005?"
Click to expand...
Like I said a while ago, I don' t think that's a consistent rule.

Just like in the comics where sometimes going back into the past of 616 diverges the past timeline to a new universe, while future travellers such as Bishop diverge THEIR OWN universe from 616.

I think the OG timeline would be 10005 since the designation in the handbook was meant to represent that.
 
BB10 said:
Like I said a while ago, I don' t think that's a consistent rule.

Just like in the comics where sometimes going back into the past of 616 diverges the past timeline to a new universe, while future travellers such as Bishop diverge THEIR OWN universe from 616.

I think the OG timeline would be 10005 since the designation in the handbook was meant to represent that.
Click to expand...
This is so confusing.
 
I don't hate Barakapool. It is understandable why a lot of people hated him back in the day since he was the only live action version of Deadpool. There were no other options. But nowadays, it can simply be seen as a parallel universe version of Deadpool.
 

In the Origins after credits, Barakapool was seen with his mouth open again and breaking the fourth wall, seemingly implying he was going to become more of a classic Deadpool eventually.

I don't know when the test footage below was made but maybe one could say Barakapool eventually become the Deadpool seen in it.



Just a theory though.
 
BB10 said:

In the Origins after credits, Barakapool was seen with his mouth open again and breaking the fourth wall, seemingly implying he was going to become more of a classic Deadpool eventually.

I don't know when the test footage below was made but maybe one could say Barakapool eventually become the Deadpool seen in it.



Just a theory though.
Click to expand...

These two are much different in origin, not to mention that the first Deadpool was born near the 1940s and took part in the Vietnam War, while the second one had nothing to do with that
 
myusernameyes said:
These two are much different in origin, not to mention that the first Deadpool was born near the 1940s and took part in the Vietnam War, while the second one had nothing to do with that
Click to expand...
The test footage doesn't reveal anything about DP's backstory. Plus if that test footage was made before they decided to reboot the timeline, he would have been the same guy as Origins DP.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top