wyokid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,120
Why are you not discussing Transformers despite there being twice as many comics?
No it's not. Marvel and DC have earned the readership to be able to put out that many. Supply and demand. It's basic economics. I also said END not cancelled. There's no reason for there not to be a Quantum & Woody book if it was selling well. Asmus finished his story now get a new writer. It's simple. If it was the lowest selling book then that's a different story.
Due to the small number of books ALL of them are "top characters" (I use quotes because that's a nonsensical term. Any character can be a "top character" with the right story).
I'm sorry, who's body was Otto in?
And the people who only buy one or two books get screwed.
Christ. I was agreeing with you and you still argue. At this point I'm 90% sure you own Valiant.
Wow. Horrible comparison. First off, Marvel and DC putting out so many books is a perfect example of flooding the market. It's also why so many of the books get cancelled and they try new stuff, of which a lot of that also gets cancelled.
No it's not. Marvel and DC have earned the readership to be able to put out that many. Supply and demand. It's basic economics. I also said END not cancelled. There's no reason for there not to be a Quantum & Woody book if it was selling well. Asmus finished his story now get a new writer. It's simple. If it was the lowest selling book then that's a different story.
Also, the Spider-Man comparison makes not a lick of sense. Spider-Man is one of Marvel's top characters, arguably THE top character. Valiant has their own top characters, of which Quantum & Woody certainly don't qualify as. Nor are they taking a break for five years. It's 5 or 6 months at most (less if you factor in The Delinquents mini that Q&W appear in with A&A).
Due to the small number of books ALL of them are "top characters" (I use quotes because that's a nonsensical term. Any character can be a "top character" with the right story).
The Spider-Man analogy is also massively flawed when you consider they did "get rid of Spider-Man" for a year or so through the Superior/Dr. Octopus body switch thing. How many readers did they lose?
I'm sorry, who's body was Otto in?
Valiant has openly said they want to keep the line small to help build readership. It makes it easier for new fans to get into the universe by keeping it at a point where if they like a series, they can buy old back issues and trades, and likely be motivated to check out the other series the same way. And it's been working. Valiant issues and trades consistently sell out, requiring second, third, fourth, and fifth printings of the issues. And the trades are all now up to second or third printings as well.
Seems to me they're doing it right.
They're not stupid. Trying to compete with the juggernauts that are Marvel and DC in a "publish as many books as you can" capacity right out of the gate is stupid.
And the people who only buy one or two books get screwed.
Not the same thing. Valiant does this thing literally on a weekly basis. Can't say that for Marvel or DC. It's nice Marvel and DC occasionally do those things, but Valiant regularly does it. Valiant has shown they both respect and appreciate their fans, it's hard to see Marvel or DC really having the same appreciation. It's more that they take their fans for granted, in many respects.
Christ. I was agreeing with you and you still argue. At this point I'm 90% sure you own Valiant.
Last edited: