Ultimates V2 #9 discussion (SPOILERS!!)

Tony's Eyes

Well, I went through all my issues of Ultimates 2 this weekend to look into the Brown v. Blue eyes with Tony.

There seems to be Brown eyes every issue except 2 consecutive issues in which he has Blue eyes.

I believe they were issues 4 & 5 - I don't have my notes with me.

I DID NOT check on Jarvis' eyes.

Seems like this could be a faux paus.

Leather
 
Re: Tony's Eyes

leather_w0lf said:
Well, I went through all my issues of Ultimates 2 this weekend to look into the Brown v. Blue eyes with Tony.

There seems to be Brown eyes every issue except 2 consecutive issues in which he has Blue eyes.

I believe they were issues 4 & 5 - I don't have my notes with me.

I DID NOT check on Jarvis' eyes.

Seems like this could be a faux paus.

Leather

You know, I checked all of Tony's eye things as well, including volume one and I noticed this. He only appears with brown eyes when he's appearing in a vunerable or public situation sans his armor. When he's on TV, in the board meeting, meeting with Thor. All these situations he appears with brown eyes. I also checked out volume one for any possible faux paus on this account. I found one, in issue two when Fury and Stark are meeting to discuss the Ultimates. When Tony climbs out of his armor and is drinking his vodka, his eyes are very clearly blue. Yet, when he reappears after getting dressed, his eyes have become brown. Strangely, it's the very same panel where Tony mentions he wonders what it would be like if all the spooks and billionaires tried to help the world instead of bleed it dry.

I'm willing to say it's simply a very long running mistake, but the fact it shows up only in certain spots makes me wonder otherwise. Subtler clues have been left in comics. I have yet to check Jarvis's eyes as well, but I'm going to get around to it soon, I'll post if there are any examples of it.
 
I just remembered in the Ultimates Annual, Nick Fury says (paraphrasing) - "Can you imagine the effect on morale if Captain America died? It would be like the Statue of Liberty falling."
 
Bass said:
I just remembered in the Ultimates Annual, Nick Fury says (paraphrasing) - "Can you imagine the effect on morale if Captain America died? It would be like the Statue of Liberty falling."

Oh Mark Millar, you sir are one wacky fiend...

Did he say that to Lieberman? I bet he did, just to give people more stupid reasons about why Red Skull is Lieberman.
 
He did say that to Lieberman. That'd be fantastic. If the super soldier turned people into Islamic fundamentalists complete with Arabian complexion. With lightsabers.

I'd take it.

Hell, I'm 34% terrorist as it is.
 
Who did you think the Great White Satan was? America? No my friend. It's Santa Claus.

Capitalistic ****.

Terrorist DNA percentage rising...
 
about tony's eye color:

i'm sure it has to do with his entire body being a brain. i'm sure Card will handle it.











also:

shut up, everyone who likes darth red. i friggin hate you.
 
First off - I think the Darth Red moniker is weak.

Darth Skull Sounds so much more evil.

I bet we never even get a super villain name for this bozo other than the Colonel.

But wasn't the Super Skrull a Colonel as well in his Nazi get up?

What is it with Colonels?

And Nick Fury is a Colonel in 616 but a General here? And all the Colonels are bad guys?

Watch Thunderbolt come out of his Baxter Building retirement.

Mebbe Fury gets busted back to Colonel after the nonsense in this arc ends. That's twice SHIELD has been infiltrated (3 times if you count Magnetic North in Ult. X-Men).

Heck - let's go with an even 4 - when Osborn on the Ultimate 6 busted out of the Triskellion.

Ohhhhhh! This has implications with the Triskellion falling. What about the prisoners?

Fury's head is on a platter.

And he lost an arm.

He's having a very bad day.

:twisted:

Leather
 
damn you people really get into this, i logged in to see that i had over 3,000 + post to read. and i guess that there all in this thread ;) i havn't read this whole thread, but will one day....25 pages....well heres my two cents

i thought it was an ok issue, after reading it i looked again at the cover and saw how it says in the bottom left corner (with the text). i don't have the issue on me. something about 'Nataha reveals a secret'. i also liked how Jarvis got nailed. wheres them negtives now!!. i really wanted to see a pick of whats going on west coast. what happened to the hollywood sign, the space neddle?, did California really sink to the bottom of the ocean? 8).
 
Last edited:
I'm not into the Tony Eye Color discussions. I really hope nothing comes of it.

This thread will turn into a joke pretty soon. Most of the initial intelligent discussions are running out... and people can't get away from Red Skull, who I personally enjoy (even with the weapon).
 
When I first finished this issue, I sat down and started typing up my comments, but I doubt anyone wants to hear most of them at this point, since the highlights of this issue have already been discussed. However, just a few things I wanted to post here:

One thing I would have been interested in seeing is Loki's (Gunnar's. Whatever-he's-calling-himself-this-month's) allies' reaction to his declaration of himself as a Norse god, and his comment about World War III. Do "Colonel Lightsaber and company" believe this guy is a Norse god? If so, why? Has he given them some sort of huge display of his powers? Or do his allies think he's nuts and are just playing along with him because he's getting them useful information? If he really has been part of the European Super Soldier program, that alone would make him valuable enough for his allies to tolerate a few, ah, eccentricities. Do his allies really intend to start a third world war? Or do they just plan to curtail the US super soldier and other war efforts, and Loki is playing them for suckers? (I think Rhyo has also commented on this elsewhere in this forum.)

Technically, you could argue that this makes two Norse gods on the side of the villains, because we have a character doing the whole Thor-lightning thing. So, is that the original harness and hammer? It certainly doesn't look like Mjolnir as portrayed previously in the series. Is there a second set of hardware (thereby suggesting that this really is invented and reproducible Earth technology), or has the hammer just been physically altered for some reason?

Someone mentioned a "god vs. god" battle, which would certainly be justified, but I wonder just what kind of a battle could take place between Thor and Loki. Even without the hardware, Thor could probably break Loki in half, as Loki's real "magical ability" seems to be in the realm of information, not physical fighting skills. (He's like the Ultimate Spin Doctor.) Loki pretty much just seems to manipulate the people around him into doing what he wants, and doesn't do much himself. He does this with information, or misinformation, or misinterpretation of information. This could be his most formidable weapon against an organization like SHIELD, which relies heavily on accurate and timely information. In Issue 4, for example, his explanation of the "theft" of the hardware sounds very straight-forward and plausible, and is delivered believably enough that none of the other characters seem to think there could be any more to the story than what they're getting. And every word might have been the truth, as well, although I doubt it was the whole truth.

The only other ability Loki appears to possess is that his mere presence causes chaos, even if he isn't doing anything other than standing there. In order to defeat him, there must be some way for the Ultimates to tell what part of reality he's altered (or altering) and how to stop it. The story might not come to a full-blown battle between Loki and Wanda, but I can't help wondering if she might play a major part in the Ultimates' defense against him. (If she's just out cold and not actually dead at the end of Issue 9.)

The fact that Wanda appears to have to juggle "variables" in order to alter reality was pretty impressive. I need a calculator to balance my checkbook, and this woman can run complex mathematical equations in her head in the heat of battle? :shock:

I'll also be interested in seeing what exactly Wanda accomplished with her mutant abilities before she was taken out of the fight. She appears to get at least two "shots" off. There's nothing specific about what in reality she was trying to alter. Mark Millar has written himself an incredible "fudge factor" with this particular plot point.

Somewhere on this thread is a discussion of "Abomination" being human or a dog or other animal. Keep in mind also that Fury remarks that there are representatives of eleven alien species on Earth as of the Chitauri offensive. This is a long shot, but still a possible explanation.

UltimateE said:
I must be the only person who isn't assuming that the Red Helmet guy is Red Skull.
No, you're not. I don't have much of a 616 Marvel background to draw on, and none of these new people are wearing nametags. (So, not only are they villains, they are also inconsiderate villains. :wink: ) At this point, to me they are mostly nameless, aside from Loki and someone named Dynamo, and a man addressed as "Colonel". For all I know, they're original characters that Millar has created. Until someone in the title refers to them by name, they're all just "one of the bad guys, [insert individual physical description here]". "Colonel Lightsaber" might well turn out to be Red Skull, but I don't know that yet.

There were several posts that were quote-worthy, but this one really made me laugh:

TheManWithoutFear said:
Hawkeye: "I'm alive! Come pick me up."

Fury: "With what?! Glad you're ok, but we kinda have a situation we're dealing with."

Hawkeye fans: "He can just magically run to New York"

Hawkeye: "I'm good but not that good"
Thanks, MWoF, I needed that. :lol:
 
Seldes Katne said:
When I first finished this issue, I sat down and started typing up my comments, but I doubt anyone wants to hear most of them at this point, since the highlights of this issue have already been discussed. However, just a few things I wanted to post here:
Yeah, Seldes. We never want to hear what you have to say. :roll:


One thing I would have been interested in seeing is Loki's (Gunnar's. Whatever-he's-calling-himself-this-month's) allies' reaction to his declaration of himself as a Norse god, and his comment about World War III. Do "Colonel Lightsaber and company" believe this guy is a Norse god? If so, why? Has he given them some sort of huge display of his powers? Or do his allies think he's nuts and are just playing along with him because he's getting them useful information? If he really has been part of the European Super Soldier program, that alone would make him valuable enough for his allies to tolerate a few, ah, eccentricities. Do his allies really intend to start a third world war? Or do they just plan to curtail the US super soldier and other war efforts, and Loki is playing them for suckers? (I think Rhyo has also commented on this elsewhere in this forum.)
I think it's just because he's giving them some valuable information and whoever is in charge is probably been working closely enough with him that the other lackey's know not to question him. If they don't think he's a god, they wouldn't say it outloud.

Technically, you could argue that this makes two Norse gods on the side of the villains, because we have a character doing the whole Thor-lightning thing. So, is that the original harness and hammer? It certainly doesn't look like Mjolnir as portrayed previously in the series. Is there a second set of hardware (thereby suggesting that this really is invented and reproducible Earth technology), or has the hammer just been physically altered for some reason?
I'm gonna have to go back and look at this again. I hope it's not just hardware. Even though Loki/Gunnar said that, I still don't think it confirms anything about Thor's godhood. I don't know why we all think it does. I still believe the story would be better if he was but it's too early to tell. I guess we'll see in about two months?

Someone mentioned a "god vs. god" battle, which would certainly be justified, but I wonder just what kind of a battle could take place between Thor and Loki. Even without the hardware, Thor could probably break Loki in half, as Loki's real "magical ability" seems to be in the realm of information, not physical fighting skills. (He's like the Ultimate Spin Doctor.) Loki pretty much just seems to manipulate the people around him into doing what he wants, and doesn't do much himself. He does this with information, or misinformation, or misinterpretation of information. This could be his most formidable weapon against an organization like SHIELD, which relies heavily on accurate and timely information. In Issue 4, for example, his explanation of the "theft" of the hardware sounds very straight-forward and plausible, and is delivered believably enough that none of the other characters seem to think there could be any more to the story than what they're getting. And every word might have been the truth, as well, although I doubt it was the whole truth.
I'm banking that when the fire gets close to Loki he's gonna be the first one to disappear.

The only other ability Loki appears to possess is that his mere presence causes chaos, even if he isn't doing anything other than standing there. In order to defeat him, there must be some way for the Ultimates to tell what part of reality he's altered (or altering) and how to stop it. The story might not come to a full-blown battle between Loki and Wanda, but I can't help wondering if she might play a major part in the Ultimates' defense against him. (If she's just out cold and not actually dead at the end of Issue 9.)
I don't think anyone's brought a Wanda vs. Loki scenerio up before. But that sounds like it would be a really great matchup. Wanda, even though everyone complains that they don't know what her powers are, would be a perfect foil to Loki.


I'll also be interested in seeing what exactly Wanda accomplished with her mutant abilities before she was taken out of the fight. She appears to get at least two "shots" off. There's nothing specific about what in reality she was trying to alter. Mark Millar has written himself an incredible "fudge factor" with this particular plot point.
I guess I'm the only one not bothered as much by it then... :?

Somewhere on this thread is a discussion of "Abomination" being human or a dog or other animal. Keep in mind also that Fury remarks that there are representatives of eleven alien species on Earth as of the Chitauri offensive. This is a long shot, but still a possible explanation.
Good catch. I think he's gonna be just human and the tail's there too look "Kewl". But it's always a possibility.


There were several posts that were quote-worthy, but this one really made me laugh:

Thanks, MWoF, I needed that. :lol:
I needed that today. :D
 
has anyone read neil gaiman's american gods? i won't spoil it here for you...but issue 9's reveal of loki really made me think back to gaiman's book (which is freaking sweet...especially if you dig mythology on a global scale)
 
selfproclaimed said:
has anyone read neil gaiman's american gods?
I haven't read it, but I've heard several positive reviews of it. From the sounds of things, I should add it to my winter reading list.

TheManWithoutFear said:
Seldes Katne said:
So, is that the original harness and hammer? It certainly doesn't look like Mjolnir as portrayed previously in the series. Is there a second set of hardware (thereby suggesting that this really is invented and reproducible Earth technology), or has the hammer just been physically altered for some reason?
I'm gonna have to go back and look at this again. I hope it's not just hardware. Even though Loki/Gunnar said that, I still don't think it confirms anything about Thor's godhood. I don't know why we all think it does. I still believe the story would be better if he was but it's too early to tell. I guess we'll see in about two months?
Yes, two months sounds about right, unfortunately.... :? I don't have any insight into the shape of the hammer, it was just something I noticed. Presumably we'll get some sort of explanation by the end of the arc, since Thor's godhood has been a pretty major issue in this second series.

I'll also be interested in seeing what exactly Wanda accomplished with her mutant abilities before she was taken out of the fight. She appears to get at least two "shots" off. There's nothing specific about what in reality she was trying to alter. Mark Millar has written himself an incredible "fudge factor" with this particular plot point.
I guess I'm the only one not bothered as much by it then... :?
I'm not bothered by it, necessarily. I think it could be there as a set-up for some event that normally otherwise wouldn't be believable. (Don't ask me what, this is pure conjecture on my part.)

I needed that today. :D
Finals week at school, eh? Good luck!
 
Seldes Katne said:
I haven't read it, but I've heard several positive reviews of it. From the sounds of things, I should add it to my winter reading list.

you most certainly should...i knw you've posted stuff about norse mythology...and there is quite a bit of it in american gods...among mythology from civilizations from across the globe
 
selfproclaimed said:
has anyone read neil gaiman's american gods? i won't spoil it here for you...but issue 9's reveal of loki really made me think back to gaiman's book (which is freaking sweet...especially if you dig mythology on a global scale)

I started reading it, but forgot about it. I had to return it before I could finish. But yes, the parts I did read I liked, so I'll have to get it back out this holidays.
 
after reading thro most of the pages i couldn't find that anyone had mentoned this (hopefully no one has)
But the "abomanation" (hulk conterpart) has a tail?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top