TheManWithoutFear
#1 reason not to join UC
Why wouldn't Carnage be able to become symbiotic? I mean it is a mixture that's part of the Venom project. I think Carnage is being parasitic off of the remains of Gwen and keeping her alive.
The problem, I guess, is why is it stupid for her to become a monster? I understand MJ (As, like I said, she's supposed to be the stable part of Pete's life), but why your aversion to Gwen?
Yeah, **** stories don't wash away just because it gets retconned. Especially if you laid down money for it.
I don't care what they call what MJ's turned into. She turned into something, that's the problem.
I don't get how this in and of itself is a bad thing. So MJ should be untouchable? We haven't even see the whole arc play out yet.
I posted that 23 pages ago. If you wanna know why I think that she shouldn't turn into a big ugly monster (although I think it's pretty obvious) read the rest of the thread.I don't get how this in and of itself is a bad thing. So MJ should be untouchable? We haven't even see the whole arc play out yet.
Same reason. MJ is not *the* stable part, she's *one of* the stable parts. Gwen is another, as is Aunt May, Uncle Ben (yes, even though he's dead), etc..
While I agree that Aunt May is, Gwen and Uncle Ben are not. They both are tragedies in Peter's life, so they can't really be stable parts of his life since they were both meant to destabilize his life.
I don't get how this in and of itself is a bad thing. So MJ should be untouchable? We haven't even see the whole arc play out yet.
I agree. If she stays this way, running around rooftops with Peter then I won't be so crazy about it. If she gets back to normal by the time the arc is done, there's no harm as far as I'm concerned.
Omega, just so you know I don't trust anyone with a female celebrity as an avatar.
So it's ok to write crap as long as the crap isn't permenant. Turning her into a Goblin just to change her back no harm, no foul would be even worse storytelling then just turning her into a Goblin and keeping her that way for a while. Now that he's done it, he needs to stick with it. No matter how dumb it is.I agree. If she stays this way, running around rooftops with Peter then I won't be so crazy about it. If she gets back to normal by the time the arc is done, there's no harm as far as I'm concerned.
Agreed.It won't change Bendis into a better writer if he drags up this plot twist just to throw it out.
He wants to use it? He has to prove to us he can make it work. Otherwise its just ****ty writing.
It won't change Bendis into a better writer if he drags up this plot twist just to throw it out.
He wants to use it? He has to prove to us he can make it work. Otherwise its just ****ty writing.
It won't change Bendis into a better writer if he drags up this plot twist just to throw it out.
TheManWithoutFear said:Omega, just so you know I don't trust anyone with a female celebrity as an avatar.
are you -really- just here to argue about this issue?
No. He's also here to defend UIM.are you -really- just here to argue about this issue?
I agree. If she stays this way, running around rooftops with Peter then I won't be so crazy about it. If she gets back to normal by the time the arc is done, there's no harm as far as I'm concerned.
are you -really- just here to argue about this issue?
Random said:But see now he has to fit this experience in with her character, kinda like how he had her freaked over the bridge incident and Peter comented she needed someone to talk to like a pyschiatist. He should of gone further with that. But something like this would have absolutely HUGE psychological ramifications on her and would have to effect her as a character from here on out or else, like the good Doctor said, its just ****ty writting. And that's what most of us hate about this, unless she retains no memory of this event is really screws up who she is.