The Dark Knight {Spoilers Abound}

Silly Bass, that was in Gotham! :roll:

What a fool I have been! (I've even found out the street name from a guy who worked safety on the film. I'm goin'.)

Are you sure you are actually in Chicago this time?

We were tricked last time.

I really am.

What!?!?

Come visit me!

In the night.

With lube.

You're looking for South La Salle Street, a few blocks from where my train arrives during the week.

JEALOUS MUCH?

EDIT: Y'know, I just went to look on Google Maps and I realized how many times I've walked past exactly where they shot that without even remembering it. The comic shop I go to downtown is on Monroe, just off of Michigan Avenue, so I usually walk down that part of La Salle Street on the way back to my train from there.

I totally am in Chi-town. But my time is not my own. I'm not on holiday. PM me your number, maybe if I get a moment I'll catch you. :/
 
Hmmm. Must be automatic.

Whatever, Planet-Men. You're just mad because you're a reality show caricature of a gay and no one pays any attention.

Planet-man aping me said:
This message is hidden because DIrishB is on your gay list.

Speaking of which...Langsta's gay?


Dammit, in some small way, Joel Schumacher has hijacked even this Batman thread!!
 
Last edited:
Redirected from the: Worst dialogue in a comic book movie

Does Two-face count? In forever didn't batman throw a bunch of coins at him which makes him stumble and fall trying to find HIS coin. That should count.

Lets see, he shot some dude in the neck with his grappling hook and let him hanging (not sure if he died but damn if it wasn't cruel), he threw some henchmen down the middle of an extremely long spiral stair case, he opened fired on the Joker. Not to mention the dozen of henchmen killed when Batman bombed the chemical factory. And that's just the 89 film, for a superhero whose moral fiber has been against killing for decades he sure racked up quite a bit in kills.
 
The '89 Batman franchise was mostly based on the original comics from the '30s and '40s where he killed criminals all the time, sometimes with an actual revolver.

His moral stance on killing is actually a significant and underappreciated arc throughout the three films. In Batman, he doesn't kill anyone and very much tries to save Jack Napier from a fatal fall in the chemical factory. Then, when he discovers it was the Joker who murdered his parents, he pulls out all the stops, fully intends to kill him and along the way ends up killing half his henchmen as well.

In the ultra-dark Batman Returns, he is still in this place. He kills numerous henchmen, but is eventually stunned into putting all this in perspective when he sees the parallels between himself and the psychotic Catwoman, whom he's falling in love with. He tries to "save" her at the climax by talking her out of it all, but fails.

In Batman Forever, there's heavy focus placed on this in his dealings with Robin and his revenge-plans for Twoface, which goes into detail about how it will just leave him without a course and looking for another and another to kill until one day he's empty. He finally kills Twoface himself. His final kill. This one, however, does give him satisfaction, not because it ended Twoface's life, but because it saved Robin's from the same path.

I actually wrote an award-winning essay on this in high school, maybe the best assignment ever.
 
The '89 Batman franchise was mostly based on the original comics from the '30s and '40s where he killed criminals all the time, sometimes with an actual revolver.

His moral stance on killing is actually a significant and underappreciated arc throughout the three films. In Batman, he doesn't kill anyone and very much tries to save Jack Napier from a fatal fall in the chemical factory. Then, when he discovers it was the Joker who murdered his parents, he pulls out all the stops, fully intends to kill him and along the way ends up killing half his henchmen as well.

In the ultra-dark Batman Returns, he is still in this place. He kills numerous henchmen, but is eventually stunned into putting all this in perspective when he sees the parallels between himself and the psychotic Catwoman, whom he's falling in love with. He tries to "save" her at the climax by talking her out of it all, but fails.

In Batman Forever, there's heavy focus placed on this in his dealings with Robin and his revenge-plans for Twoface, which goes into detail about how it will just leave him without a course and looking for another and another to kill until one day he's empty. He finally kills Twoface himself. His final kill. This one, however, does give him satisfaction, not because it ended Twoface's life, but because it saved Robin's from the same path.

I actually wrote an award-winning essay on this in high school, maybe the best assignment ever.

Batman only had a gun for the first couple issues.
 

I first saw this a couple of days ago on BOF, but decided not to post it since it really doesn't tell us anything new. For the most part everyone knew that Batman 3 wouldn't be released (by Nolan anyway) until 2012 at the earliest. The actual artivle on BOF is a bit more optimistic about the prospects of Nolan returning. For instance the "industry scuttlebug" of a few weeks ago was that Nolan's deal with WB over Inception carried with it a gentleman's agreement that he would do Batman 3 after it. Until I hear anything solid, it's just rumors.

And as for Snyder doing it, according to BOF he isn't interested. While Snyder is a pretty good filmmaker (I know some will disagree), I don't like the idea of him doing Batman.
 
Last edited:
The only thing that would bother me with Snyder taking over is that it would be too over the top as far as the action goes and it wouldn't keep that serious tone that the previous two had. I'd be scared that it would be more stylized like 300, which would be cool but not at this point in the franchise. But it kinda explains that anyway.
 
The only thing that would bother me with Snyder taking over is that it would be too over the top as far as the action goes and it wouldn't keep that serious tone that the previous two had. I'd be scared that it would be more stylized like 300, which would be cool but not at this point in the franchise. But it kinda explains that anyway.

Exactly. My main complaint regarding Watchmen is that the fighting is so over-stylized. Everything else I can live with, but some of the stuff he added just seemed pointless. It's a good movie, but if he would have made the action a bit more realistic it would have been much better.
 
The only thing that would bother me with Snyder taking over is that it would be too over the top as far as the action goes and it wouldn't keep that serious tone that the previous two had. I'd be scared that it would be more stylized like 300, which would be cool but not at this point in the franchise. But it kinda explains that anyway.

Yeah, a Snyder Batman movie could be cool as hell, but just not right for the current franchise
 
I dunno how true this is.

According to Nolan, he never planned to do a sequel to BATMAN BEGINS and the original idea for THE DARK KNIGHT was two movies - one on the Joker, and the other on Two-Face and he combined them.

Normally, filmmakers and writers like to do the George Lucas approach - they planned it all out in advance. But Nolan, in pretty much every thing I see of him where he talks about the franchise as a franchise, explains he has no thoughts beyond the single movie that he's currently making. Which means I kinda believe him.

That said, this source says that part of his lack of desire to do a third movie is that his plans for Joker are gone. I don't believe he had any, so I don't really know what to think about this.
 
I dunno how true this is.

According to Nolan, he never planned to do a sequel to BATMAN BEGINS and the original idea for THE DARK KNIGHT was two movies - one on the Joker, and the other on Two-Face and he combined them.

Normally, filmmakers and writers like to do the George Lucas approach - they planned it all out in advance. But Nolan, in pretty much every thing I see of him where he talks about the franchise as a franchise, explains he has no thoughts beyond the single movie that he's currently making. Which means I kinda believe him.
I completely agree. Nolan has always said he'd only do another one if there's a story worth telling. Also I believe it was only Goyer who talks about the trilogy idea with Two-Face being set up, not necessarily Nolan. I say don't believe it until it's confirm or at least Inception is almost complete
That said, this source says that part of his lack of desire to do a third movie is that his plans for Joker are gone. I don't believe he had any, so I don't really know what to think about this.

Yeah it's definitely not because of the character. If it is related to Heath's death it's probably because of the memories that would be brought up working on Batman after loosing a friend.
 
Last edited:
So get someone else to do another one and if Nolan gets an idea he wants to do or whatever, have him do the one after that.

Only three directors ahve made Batman movies, there's probably hundreds of people that could do a good one.
 
Just saw this again... right now.

One of my absolute favourite films ever. No question. Wow wow wow wow wow wow.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top