wyokid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,120
I just realized it would make more sense for Daredevil to show up in AoS than vice versa. Less payment too. Probably will come the week after Daredevil premieres too for synergy.
I just realized it would make more sense for Daredevil to show up in AoS than vice versa. Less payment too. Probably will come the week after Daredevil premieres too for synergy.
I don't know who Jeff Sneider is, but he's pretty sure the MCU Spidey won't be white and probably won't be called Peter Parker:
http://screenrant.com/spider-man-marvel-reboot-2017-casting-race/
I'm cool with him not being white, but I don't want them to do Miles yet. I just really want to see Peter Parker done right.
Then in a few years, introduce Miles.
Marvel doesn't have the rights back to Spider-Man, they just made a deal where Sony lets them use him. Sony still is in full ownership of the character's film rights and still have final say. That's not to say you're wrong, but just if anyone will make the decision (with of course Marvel's input), it'll be Sony.I think this Jeff Sneider character is full of it. For some reason I just can't see Marvel, first thing after getting characters rights back, either killing Peter Parker or doing a random race switch on one of their highest profile most well know characters. Especially since the characters true movie potential has barely been touched. Spider-man is practically a universe of his own. With all the potential, between solo films, team-ups, spin-off films, that would just be bad business. And I don't see Marvel making that mistake again.
What? Less payment? Marvel outright owns the film and television rights for Daredevil. Just because Netflix is airing and producing the DD series doesn't give them any right to licensing ownership to the character, hence if they wanted DD to appear on AoS they could do that without having to pay anything to anyone except Charlie Cox, the actor, for playing the role on AoS.
T hat said, I seriously doubt he'll show up on AoS. For one, it doesn't fit the story at all, right now. Why would a crime fighting, street-level vigilante who's just starting out happen upon Coulson and his team? Especially since they're building up the Inhumans plot, and will (around the time Daredevil premieres) be only a few weeks out from their inevitable Age of Ultron crossover on AoS.
Besides, the DD show doesn't even need that type of shameless plug... it's anticipated beyond measure by most comic fans, and assuming the reviews are good (which they likely will be), combined with the fact it's an MCU extension, that combination is really all the advertising the show needs. The amount of coverage it's been getting in both comic media and the general media is pretty impressive. They certainly don't need a forced and unnatural AoS cameo to sell the DD series to the general public. Hell, I'd argue the DD Netflix show will probably have a bigger viewership than AoS does on average.
I really doubt you'll see Daredevil on AoS at all, let alone in the next month or so.
Marvel doesn't have the rights back to Spider-Man, they just made a deal where Sony lets them use him. Sony still is in full ownership of the character's film rights and still have final say. That's not to say you're wrong, but just if anyone will make the decision (with of course Marvel's input), it'll be Sony.
.Correct, instead of paying for Clark Gregg, Chloe Bennett, and whoever else extra, they only have to pay Charlie Cox extra. Thus less payment
Sif is coming back and they're tying that in. Mr. Hyde is a Daredevil bad guy so that'd be cool to see, Crusher Creel is in both shows, and the casting of Karla Gideon. There's so many ways to connect it.
Neither did Agent Carter, didn't stop them.
I'm not saying they're not connecting the shows, I'm just saying I doubt you're going to see Charlie Cox showing up as Daredevil on AoS. Also, we don't know Creel is in both, they only released a promo image that may indicate that (yet the actor hasn't been listed in any cast lists). Who is Karla Gideon? And Sif returning has nothing to do with Daredevil as far as I know, so how is that being "tied in"?
Not at all the same situation as Daredevil. Notice also that there haven't been any promos released for DD that have aired on ABC, nor will there be. Not the same thing at all.
I meant they're tying Sif's return into the larger story. Maybe Cal is selling drugs in Hell's Kitchen. Karla Gideon is the character from Daredevil: Redemption that was recently cast.
There have been. The logo in the city ad played during Agent Carter when I was watching it live. AoS needs the boost and like you said, Daredevil is going to have more viewers. What better way to boost AoS than the main character appearing?
"But the truest portrait of this moron comes form the fact that Ridley Scott and James Cameron wanted to collaborate on an sequel to Alien/Aliens and he decided to go with Alien Vs Predator instead because it had a "great script."
No need to worry. The deal is already signed (hence the public announcement). And after seeing the returns on the next Spidey solo film in 2017 (which will assuredly be better than ASM2's), I doubt Rothman will try to negate or control anything to a point of ruining the deal.
Edit:
Actually, after reading about this guy's views of superhero films and his track record with anything that's not a straight up drama film, I am indeed apprehensive. Apparently he micromanaged Wolverine: Origins extensively, and it was during his tenure at Fox that we got X-Men - The Last Stand, and the two Fantastic Four movies.
And also, this:
Oh... ****.
Everyone has seen the Deadpool test footage, right?
http://youtu.be/LoXGsv9nsNs
When Deadpool says "Hi, Tom" at the end, it's because Tom Rothman was so opposed to a Deadpool film and wouldn't let it happen. That's some brilliant meta right there, I tell you what!!
Not bad. But "la piscina de la muerte" is not part of the MCU.
I know that, but we were on a tangent concerning Tom Rothman and how he's bad news when it comes to overseeing superhero films.