I've been mainly quiet about this since I've stopped watching the show back when time travel was introduced and thought for sure the Doctor would show up and proclaim that the island was simply one of his rooms on the TARDIS.
Anyways, from what I've read in the past few pages, most of you guys seem pissed that the explanations being given to the some of the shows mysteries are bogus. And from what I can gather, most of you think that if the show was allowed to go on, you would get better explanations. Well guess what? You'd probably get more pissed off. You have been left in the dark and enjoying the fact that you need to ferret out the show's mysteries that now the show is actually giving you the answers, it's lost the mystique that attracted so many of you in the first place, so much so it doesn't seem like the same show.
Sacred&Profane, Random and I (possibly in addition to others I'm forgetting) have been pretty satisfied with things. People clammering for "answers" are people who misunderstand what LOST is trying to achieve. Throwing your arms up in the air and screaming because of the magical jungle ghost whispers or, I don't know, whatever's going on with Walt is sort of misguided; the explanations are peripheral, because the mystery is just a framing mechanism for a show centered around character interaction/development with a philosophical backdrop. But I think that you're right that most fans are impossible to please.
And, honestly, I'd be totally cool if the last episode revealed the island to be part of the TARDIS. In fact, now that you've brought it up, I'll be disappointed if it
doesn't happen.
Pretentious maybe, but to dismiss what valid criticisms he makes is just being ignorant. Essentially he's saying that the final season could have been better constructed because these final hours of the show serves as a crutch. Where the show could have been more thrilling and better crafted throughout the season, the writers relied on their final curtain call to make or break the series as a whole. If consistency ruled the world, I wouldn't have complained about this season being boring or incoherent.
It's not ignorant to dismiss criticisms that are, in fact, not valid at all. This guy is both wrong
and a bad writer.
The finale only functions as a crutch for people who are still expecting every single plot thread to be addressed. Which they won't be. All that he succeeds in doing is outlining the complaints of people who haven't bothered to stop and think for five seconds about the sort of story that LOST is telling, in and of itself
ignorant of its conjoined narrative. It looks like the finale is just a compliment the new perspective provided by season 6, hopefully with an adequate resolution to the major umbrella arc.
In addition, it seems that he's more concerned with the mythology overtaking the show, which is directly contrary to this incessant whining about "answers". I've read a few good critiques that address some of the issues in the show, but this just isn't one of them. His analysis is confused, and I'd sort of expect a better sense of internal logic in an editorialized piece in the ******* New York Times. He wrote an equally uninformed and fallacious piece on the series 5 premiere of Doctor Who, making it apparent to me that he is just incapable of understanding serialized fiction.