Planet-man
Well-Known Member
Because it's automatically making the movie less character-driven and more about sheer action. MEH.
Avengers movie discussion (news/etc.)
- Thread starter Hellsbuttmonkey
- Start date
Because it's automatically making the movie less character-driven and more about sheer action. MEH.
Which is why they hired Whedon, he's the farthest from a character story Director as humanly possible.
Planet-man
Well-Known Member
Whether or not it turns out that way, I'm saying IF they make it mostly Hulk with hardly any Banner, I will be disappointed in that.
DIrishB
The Timeline Guy
I went into a Hulk-like rage when I heard about this. So now not only is Edward Norton not going to play Bruce Banner/the Hulk in The Avengers, but now I have to explain to my neighbor how I crushed his truck into his fireplace and then tread the very uncomfortable ground of explaining why I raped some of his livestock (my neighbor is a farmer).
Damn you Marvel Studios!!
Langsta
Well-Known Member
I love Ed Norton. But Joaquin Phoenix really isn't a bad replacement idea. I'd love to see him play Bruce Banner.
Dancanread
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
- Messages
- 1,638
We don't know that. There's nothing to say the script will be any different with a different actor playing Banner. Given the Joaquin Phoenix rumor, it sounds like they're still looking at actors who can bring some good game to the table.
EDIT: Oh, wait. You're saying that if there's not enough screen time for Banner regardless, it means they'll be focusing on the action more. I get it. Well, still. It doesn't mean it won't be character-driven.
I respectfully disagree.
Captain Canuck
The poster formerly known as captaincanuck65
Totally a class act.
Random
Didn't **** any of those *****es
My levels of respect for high have risen so significantly, I didn't think it was possible. It great to hear a casting dispute being more civil.
Bass
Nexus of the World
Initially, I was opposed to Fillion platying more than one part, but now that I think of it; it would be awesome if he was Banner, Pym, and Captain America. It'd be like DR STRANGELOVE but thrice as awesome.
That's what he wants you to think!
Gothamite
Well-Known Member
So...basically Norton is just confirming that it was all about money and it's great that everybody's sad he can't do it...but SRSLY GUYS, THEY WEREN'T GIVIN ME NUFF MONIES.
Why has your respect risen for him?!
Planet-man
Well-Known Member
Norton's always been a class act who just seems to "get it", but it's still nice to see that being kept up. I've already had the career of one of my favourite actors pretty much end this week(Gibson), it would suck to have to deal with a lot of drama from another.
Edit:
Where is he confirming that? I took this to mean it's still about creative differences (presumably: he doesn't want to play the Hulk as a villain).
Edit:
Where is he confirming that? I took this to mean it's still about creative differences (presumably: he doesn't want to play the Hulk as a villain).
Last edited:
Gothamite
Well-Known Member
It didn't really read that way to me. The parts that stuck out to me were "it hasn't turned out as we all hoped." That to me sounds like money.
Random
Didn't **** any of those *****es
Even if that is the case, so what? He's a big star and a great actor who can get bigger movies and didn't want a significant pay cut for such a big project that would probably consume a lot of time for him. He didn't take it personally and he shows absolute respect for Marvel and the fans. And does whatever he can to not be bitter about. He doesn't complain, *****, or moan. He doesn't point fingers and thanks everyone for the opportunity. That is both humble and respectful something you don't see enough of in this industry.
Planet-man
Well-Known Member
Okay.... if this was in any way about a man who will already be a multi-millionaire for life turning down the chance to reprise a role he supposedly loves and millions of fans want him him because they weren't paying him quite enough multiples of a million dollars.... then **** him, that's ridiculous and I can't see how ANYONE would think that's classy or respectful to the fans, no matter how polite a letter he writes.
But there's no sense getting worked up over that idea until I see any evidence that it happened, which I seriously doubt.
But there's no sense getting worked up over that idea until I see any evidence that it happened, which I seriously doubt.
Kal-Ill
Well-Known Member
It's whatever really. Downey, Jr. is still Tony f'n Stark so I'm fine with whoever shows up as Banner. No matter how much I dig Norton.... Banner isn't the star anyway, Hulk is.
Zombipanda
My Boom-Boom's mostly gay
Initially, I was opposed to Fillion platying more than one part, but now that I think of it; it would be awesome if he was Banner, Pym, and Captain America. It'd be like DR STRANGELOVE but thrice as awesome.
I second that emotion!
That...is completely ridiculous.
Captain Canuck
The poster formerly known as captaincanuck65
Langsta
Well-Known Member
I love, love, love Mark Ruffalo.
