Ultimate Quicksilver
Well-Known Member
Ultimate Daredevil, Ultimate Heroes for Hire or Ultimate Inhumans
Exactly. It just seems that someone (or a team) that has more of a "history mess" will have a higher chance of getting the title than DD, who doesn't have that kind of mess.DIrishB said:Which could be true. I'm not against an ongoing UDD series, I just don't think it'll happen for the reasons I listed previously.
icemastertron said:Exactly. It just seems that someone (or a team) that has more of a "history mess" will have a higher chance of getting the title than DD, who doesn't have that kind of mess.
I didn't really think about that, but that makes a lot of sense.icemastertron said:Exactly. It just seems that someone (or a team) that has more of a "history mess" will have a higher chance of getting the title than DD, who doesn't have that kind of mess.
Pandrio said:I didn't really think about that, but that makes a lot of sense.
Synch said:Right, because it's obviously about what you want. Daredevil made the cut, but you couldn't put Wolverine in there. LAME! You wolverine haters are the worst. Just because you don't want to see Wolverine in another comic book doesn't mean that it won't still be one of the top sellers in the Ultimate series. Wolverine is a marvel staple. Ultimate Wolverine is a totally different character than his 616 counterpart, and that could really be explored and expanded. But with you claw-blockers out, it starts to look like not that many people want to see wolverine in a comic book. In reality though, most people love that little furry bastard. That's why I voted for Via-Post, and I'm saying I'm fine with the lineup just the way it is. but if I had to than I guess it would be Cap and Logan. And also Daredevil is WACK. Nobody wants to read Ultimate Handicap vol. 1.
TheManWithoutFear said:Then who else has more "history mess" other than X-Men and Spider-Man? I thikn Hulk has sort of an out there background. So does Wolverine. The rest of them barely got anything.
Goodwill said:I'm not joking - Ultimate Wolverine.
Zombipanda said:I've lurked around here a couple days, and this thread made me finally join. Thanks Overlord.
I've got to defend Strange. He's gotten a bad rap in the past, in large part, I think, because the main Marvel Universe isn't conducive to -interesting- use of mysticism. A lot of people have a bad taste in their mouth because of all the magic in the Marvel universe, but I think that's because everything is overly explained in that setting. Over the years, the Marvel writers have broken down everything mystical into very strict categories and overly classified them until the mystery is lost. A lot of the reason that Thor works is because he's on a team book, where the writers DON'T do this sort of overanalysis, but that doesn't mean that a solo mystic book will overanalyze in a way like that. Books like Sandman prove that you can have a mystical paradigm that's still incredibly flexible and still leaves a great amount of mystery.
The relatively fledgeling nature of the Ultimate Universe, coupled with the fact that Ultimate Strange would have essentially complete domain over the mystical sphere, means that a good writer would have free rein to explore mystical characters that, while silly in the main Marvel universe, could be used as jump-off points for philosophical and mystical ideas. Someone else mentioned Grant Morrison, and I think he's perfect. Imagine the Marvel Universe through the lens of The Invisibles and Sandman. It's an angle that really hasn't been explored.
Strange is ideal as an Ultimate title in that it provides something that simply CANNOT be done in the overstratified and tainted world of the 616 Universe. Spider-Man can cover the concepts of street level crime. Hell, for that matter, those ideas are covered damn well in the main Marvel Universe. The reason for Ultimizing characters is to take something iconic and twist it into another light. The characters already in the Ultimate universe work because they're symbolic and they're colorful. Rapists and serial killers and mob bosses, on the other hand, are pretty much interchangable.
And as for realism.... Well, is ANYTHING in the Ultimate Universe realistic? Really now, we're talking about superheroes, dude. Realism isn't the issue. It's about making a series that's internally consistent. And without having to worry about the supernatural continuity of other books, it's entirely possible. The very core of mysticism is its mystery. Few people even know the magical exists. And few, if any know how the entirety of it works. At best, they have an understanding of some very basic principles. It doesn't run contrary to the sci-fi-ish elements of the other titles because they aren't forced to deal with occult weirdness, and at the same time, the unknowable nature of the mystic prevents the pseudo-science of the other titles from disturbing Ultimate Strange's integrity.
Dr.Strangefate said:(except The Sandman is written by Neil Gaiman, and not Morrisson)
But i <3 Morrison to death.