Ice
Teh Sexy Monkey Queen
Ooo! Touche! :wink:DIrishB said:A Perfect Circle.
Ooo! Touche! :wink:DIrishB said:A Perfect Circle.
Lynx said:Continuity used to give me a lot of headaches. It still does in regards to 616 (Which is why I only follow New Avengers in that Universe). As for Ultimate, I've read (And own) every title out there and I just go with the flow. New things override older events if it's a problem, unless a writer decides to manually fix an error later. I ignore UMTU UNTIL a specific event from it is brought up in one of the core books (The Wolverine, Hulk, and Black Widow issues, to name a few). I also ignore all FF mentions in books published before UFF #1. (With the exception of maybe Richard Parker and Eddie Brock's dad discussing Reed Richards. It's possible he was famous when he was in the Think Tank). But hey, these are just my personal views. Feel free to try to make it all fit, but your bound to run into some errors along the way. :wink:
vintsukka said:So, was the UMTU issue with FF designed to be out of continuity from the get-go? I'm just wondering why even write such a story? What's the point? It's not like it's a great story for its own right, is it?
Dr.Strangefate said:It was meant to be funny... It wasn't.
ourchair said:So does 'seriousness' and 'importance' have to be qualifying factors for a story's validity? Well, guess what that means a lot of popular entertainment would be invalidated.
UltimateE said:Nah, it's not that. I liked the brain switch story in USM with Wolverine.
I didn't think UMTU #9 was funny. Or creative. It was dumb.
That's actually a pretty smart statement. I mean if you make a story serious and with meaning, that is out of continuity, it sort of defeats the meaning of that story. (Of course, this is to say nothing of alternate realities and Elseworlds, but that's beside the point.)Dr.Strangefate said:Exactly.
If you want an out of continuity comedy issue, make it funny!
icemastertron said:Did anyone notice that in the Iron Man issue, Victor was named as VON DOOM, and not VAN DAMME?
icemastertron said:Did anyone notice that in the Iron Man issue, Victor was named as VON DOOM, and not VAN DAMME?
Well I didn't know that, or at least I didn't remember reading it.ProjectX2 said:I think that's been pointed out before. :?
Yes it is.nigma said:yea its been mentioned a few times... im guessing this is your first read through?
icemastertron said:Well I didn't know that, or at least I didn't remember reading it.
icemastertron said:I think this has been said in another thread, but I'll post it here (cuz I'm lazy).
But people have been wondering about Ultimate Daredevil's origin. Whether he had an accident that gave him his super-human senses or is just a regular human with those kinda senses. Well, in the UMTU issue, #7 I believe, and in there, DD narrates that he had an accident in his childhood that gave him his super senses. So wouldn't that solve the origin question?
Did anyone notice that in the Iron Man issue, Victor was named as VON DOOM, and not VAN DAMME?
No, it's not a terrible series, but yeah, its alright.DIrishB said:No kidding, Ice, you never read these issue before? What'd you think overall. Not a terrible series, but not a great one either.