Zombipanda
My Boom-Boom's mostly gay
Re: The [apparently decreasing] price of comics.
I still think my suggestion is genius!
I still think my suggestion is genius!
- Why are the prices of comics so high?
Quesada: "There's an argument. When you look at the amount of work that goes into a comic book. We tend to ghettoize ourselves.
Or maybe Dull O'Runny is smarter than we think.
With 24 pages as the average content length of a comic. We're looking at a total unit cost of $7500 on the creator costs,
publishing costs are about $6 per unit with an average print run of 100,000 units (the big companies get sweet publishing deals, if you are a small company [less than 100,000 units per order] you're looking at $11 per unit)
Advertising/licensing costs, this is remarkably negligible, making a few thousand promotional posters, ashcans, etc is only about $.50 per title.
When all is said and done, comics cost about $19 a unit to produce.
I don't understand the math here (i'm not trying to be a jerk here, just trying to understand what you're saying - I know nothing about the costs in the comic industry).
$7500 in creator costs divided by 100,000 comics is $0.075 per comic in creator costs. Plus publishing costs is $6.075 per comic. Does the advertising (which you said is negligible) make up the almost $13 per comic that's unaccounted for in the $19/comic figure? Or is there something else that I'm missing?
Marvel - and DC - need to really look at their pricing or it's going to put them out of business.
I've no idea what importance intonational sales are to Marvel, but the message they are giving is "not much".
Marvel - and DC - need to really look at their pricing or it's going to put them out of business.
Marvel seems to think they have a set number of readers and are going to be albe to sell to them no matter what, hence the higher price point.
DC seems to be set on making their product more acessable, hence the lower price point and projects with high media interest that don't involve falsely killing a major character.
I don't think they care how many people read the comics in the grand scheme of things;
I really don't understand why Marvel/DC don't try to advertise in other avenues. If you've got a movie out of your leading characters, put a quick plug for the comics in before the film. Something like 'Love the movie? Get the whole story at your local comics store!" Something like that. Advertise n magazines, newspapers, others. And try other kinds of books when you do it. Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane was a brilliant title (well, the first two series anyway) but Marvel advertised it to comics readers. That is NOT the audience you need to go after with a book like that. Pu an add in the pages of Dolly or Girlfriend (tween books here in Australia) or similar. I'm not a business man, but Marvel, and DC to a lesser extent, seem to have things backwards. They advertise to those who already buy their product, not the people that they need to pull into stores.
This really makes me sad, but I think you're right. If it wasn't for the comics they'd have no frakking movies to begin with! As much as I've enjoyed the films I really hate that it's at the expense of the source material. The amount of kids who now think that there was only ever Mary Jane and that they are 'changing things' by having Gwen as Peter's girl in the new Spidey film is horrible. I'd prefer them to be ignorant than to be wrong. I think that they REALLY need to set up the comics and movies as separate entities. We all know the films don't bring new readers in, so why bother trying to have the comics reflect the films?
Hell, put a code to redeem for a few free digital comics with each movie ticket, and DVD or video game case. There's no publishing cost and if it's a new reader, they wouldn't be buying comics anyway, so there's no sunk cost.
Looking at the sales for Marvel and its competitors, it certainly doesn't seem like the $3.99 price point is a huge barrier for fans or retailers. We believe the price of our comics is justified by the content and that we deliver an exceptional value for the price.
Marvel SVP David Gabriel to ComicVine:
His wording is interesting there for what he doesn't say vs. what words he chose. To me, that could easily read as "we lost an acceptable number of sales". His statement is not in any way positive.
Such a slippery slope. Keep pushing until it breaks.
So he's saying $3.99 for 20 pages is fine? 'Cuz it's totally not.
WHOA - are they seriously charging $3.99 for 20 pages?! I thought all of the $3.99 books had bonus material and were more like 32 or 34 or whatever that next highest level is.
Does the "Previously" or letters pages count?
Because for example, Ultimate Spider-Man is 20 pages of actual story. The rest is ads and those two pages.
Also, Wolverine & The X-Men is also at $3.99 and there was 20 pages of story (plus the previously page, but not letters page this time). There also has not been any bonus material since issue #1.