The argument is over, yet you STILL continue on here instead of just agreeing to disagree or PMing me. YOU are the one who is throwing a tantrum at this point.
I agree you disagree. You are just as able to PM someone as anyone else. Until then, nothing changes.
But I don't need to. You are just ignoring the evidence because a tie-in book contradicts it (which you admitted could be a mistake already).
You do actually, if you want this timeline to change, you do need to present something new, until then nothing changes.
Repeating yourself doesn't make you more correct. Why won't you just consider the evidence I've provided instead of demanding new/more evidence that you'd end up ignoring anyway?
I considered it. I disagree. Until you have something new, nothing changes.
I don't need to. I don't rely on you guys for all of my MCU timeline facts. I practice my own critical thinking and come to conclusions based on evidence I see with my own senses. Nothing changes until you decide to change it. Seems pretty arbitrary on your part bud.
Okay great, then use your own facts. No one is stopping you. We're just stopping it from being used here.
Could be? It doesn't though. It's a continuity issue. It's an error. It's WRONG.
Yes, except the continuity errors is in the trees not the book. You can disagree all you'd like, until you bring something new nothing changes.
Broken record. Your argument hasn't gotten any stronger.
This is where your thinking is fucked up. The timeline is here, you were making an argument for change. This argument was disagreed with. As the judge I don't need a stronger argument, you need to prove past reasonable doubt that your argument is worth disregarding an official source that still agrees with on screen evidence. You have, like a broken record, said the same thing over and over. My defense remains and it doesn't need to get stronger, your argument does. Until then, nothing changes.
See? He still refuses to just DM me and end it here. I offered to move past this thread but his massive ego won't allow him to be perceived as if he's conceded in any way. This man isn't being rational. He just has a complex. I don't need to bring new evidence. The evidence I have provided is sufficient to cast doubt on the book's placement. They just don't like the evidence so they ignore it.
You didn't DM either. And if you did I'd say the same thing. Your evidence has been received, considered and disagreed with, come back when you have something more to offer. I'm not conceeding and changing the timeline for you, move on. My thinking is rational, it just disagrees with you and you've deemed it irrational. What's my complex? That I love controlling this timeline. I'd give it up in a heartbeat and never look back. You so quite litterally need new evidence. It is not sufficient as stated by many and your argument backed by none. Yes we didn't like the evidence because where it is everything works and where you want it something may work better but others dont. So it's been disregarded.
What do you want from all this huh? Do you even know? What's your goal?