Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

Dallas Kinard said:
As long as people keep the debate going, which Starvel did, I will also continue to respond. My point still stands and I'm sticking with it.
Click to expand...
The debate is over. It's not that deep. We're not changing the timeline, and people can see your argument if they want to make a decision for themselves.
 
SoyaCS said:
The debate is over. It's not that deep. We're not changing the timeline, and people can see your argument if they want to make a decision for themselves.
Click to expand...
Actually it's not. Just because a few people on this specific thread agree that the book can't be wrong (despite on-screen evidence to the contrary) does not mean the debate is over. The debate is over when more evidence comes later and ends up being the deciding factor. The next time we see Doc Strange may settle it once and for all.
 
Dallas Kinard said:
I'm not allowed to reply anymore? Is that what you're saying?
Click to expand...
It's been almost 24 hours man. It's just pathetic at this point. You want us to disregard an official source that still lines up with the trees, just because you think the trees could maybe point to something different. Again can't stress this enough, you want us to throw out an official sources placement, because you provided evidence that, and I can't stress this enough either, still lines up with the official sources placement just because Dallas Kinard says it could be wrong. And you have failed repeatedly to bring anything new to the table besides "the book could be wrong". You want an official source disregarded on "could be wrong but I can't make an argument as to why".

You ever seen a debate? You know they have losers right? And if one side cannot change their argument to disprove the other that side loses. You said the trees means something else, a couple people showed how that the trees still work with the books, you haven't added a single new point. The judges have voted, you're not debating, you're throwing a tantrum.
 
Dallas Kinard said:
Actually it's not. Just because a few people on this specific thread agree that the book can't be wrong (despite on-screen evidence to the contrary) does not meant the debate is over. The debate is over when more evidence comes later and ends up being the deciding factor. The next time we see Doc Strange may settle it once and for all.
Click to expand...
Alrightie, then we'll wait and see. Until then, nothing new can be added to the debate. So we can PAUSE it.

Would that make you happy? You want some ice cream too? :)
 
Starvel said:
It's been almost 24 hours man. It's just pathetic at this point. You want us to disregard an official source that still lines up with the trees, just because you think the trees could maybe point to something different. Again can't stress this enough, you want us to throw out an official sources placement, because you provided evidence that, and I can't stress this enough either, still lines up with the official sources placement just because Dallas Kinard says it could be wrong. And you have failed repeatedly to bring anything new to the table besides "the book could be wrong". You want an official source disregarded on "could be wrong but I can't make an argument as to why".

You ever seen a debate? You know they have losers right? And if one side cannot change their argument to disprove the other that side loses. You said the trees means something else, a couple people showed how that the trees still work with the books, you haven't added a single new point. The judges have voted, you're not debating, you're throwing a tantrum.
Click to expand...
And THIS is why the debate continues. Because instead of just saying "Oh you have a different POV that could be correct? Cool!" You persist to push back and try to be right about something that just isn't settled yet.

"You want us to disregard an official source that still lines up with the trees"

The film IS an official source, as I've stated many times now. We have two conflicting official sources, this has been my point this entire time.

"you want us to throw out an official sources placement"

The only thing I want you to do is consider that you already ARE throwing out an official source by ignoring the film itself in favor of a book.

"still lines up with the official sources placement"

No it doesn't. The weather goes backwards according to the book. Dead trees come back to life in a few days. That's not logical.

"And you have failed repeatedly to bring anything new to the table besides "the book could be wrong"."

Because it COULD be, as you've already conceded lol

"You want an official source disregarded on "could be wrong but I can't make an argument as to why"."

Really? You clearly still don't know my argument. The weather doesn't line up with the placement. Trees man. Pay attention.

"a couple people showed how that the trees still work with the books"

But they didn't lol The trees do NOT work with the book. I've shown this already. I watch debates all of the time. Just because I have a point that still stands, despite what you pretend, doesn't make me lose. It means I have a point that can't be refuted. We are equally stubborn bro.
 
Starvel said:
It's been almost 24 hours man. It's just pathetic at this point. You want us to disregard an official source that still lines up with the trees, just because you think the trees could maybe point to something different. Again can't stress this enough, you want us to throw out an official sources placement, because you provided evidence that, and I can't stress this enough either, still lines up with the official sources placement just because Dallas Kinard says it could be wrong. And you have failed repeatedly to bring anything new to the table besides "the book could be wrong". You want an official source disregarded on "could be wrong but I can't make an argument as to why".

You ever seen a debate? You know they have losers right? And if one side cannot change their argument to disprove the other that side loses. You said the trees means something else, a couple people showed how that the trees still work with the books, you haven't added a single new point. The judges have voted, you're not debating, you're throwing a tantrum.
Click to expand...
You can't win a fight with a wall, just don't respond
 
Dallas Kinard said:
And THIS is why the debate continues. Because instead of just saying "Oh you have a different POV that could be correct? Cool!" You persist to push back and try to be right about something that just isn't settled yet.

"You want us to disregard an official source that still lines up with the trees"

The film IS an official source, as I've stated many times now. We have two conflicting official sources, this has been my point this entire time.

"you want us to throw out an official sources placement"

The only thing I want you to do is consider that you already ARE throwing out an official source by ignoring the film itself in favor of a book.

"still lines up with the official sources placement"

No it doesn't. The weather goes backwards according to the book. Dead trees come back to life in a few days. That's not logical.

"And you have failed repeatedly to bring anything new to the table besides "the book could be wrong"."

Because it COULD be, as you've already conceded lol

"You want an official source disregarded on "could be wrong but I can't make an argument as to why"."

Really? You clearly still don't know my argument. The weather doesn't line up with the placement. Trees man. Pay attention.

"a couple people showed how that the trees still work with the books"

But they didn't lol The trees do NOT work with the book. I've shown this already. I watch debates all of the time. Just because I have a point that still stands, despite what you pretend, doesn't make me lose. It means I have a point that can't be refuted. We are equally stubborn bro.
Click to expand...
And you've lost ice cream privileges
 
Here's what I'll say, we can end the debate HERE. But if anyone wants to continue to challenge me, my DMs are open. Now, can we move on?
 
Dallas Kinard said:
And THIS is why the debate continues. Because instead of just saying "Oh you have a different POV that could be correct? Cool!" You persist to push back and try to be right about something that just isn't settled yet.
Click to expand...
You have a different perspective! Cool story! Not changing the timeline. Think what you want. Said that before too
Dallas Kinard said:
The film IS an official source, as I've stated many times now. We have two conflicting official sources, this has been my point this entire time.
Click to expand...
Yes it is, and as pointed out doesn't conflict with the book except in your opinion
Dallas Kinard said:
The only thing I want you to do is consider that you already ARE throwing out an official source by ignoring the film itself in favor of a book.
Click to expand...
Considered. Disagreed.
Dallas Kinard said:
No it doesn't. The weather goes backwards according to the book. Dead trees come back to life in a few days. That's not logical.
Click to expand...
Noted. Anything new? Probably not
Dallas Kinard said:
Because it COULD be, as you've already conceded lol
Click to expand...
Could be isn't proof. Could be is a guess.
Dallas Kinard said:
Really? You clearly still don't know my argument. The weather doesn't line up with the placement. Trees man. Pay attention.
Click to expand...
Oh I really truly do. Trees man. I got it. I'll pay attention when you have something new. Do you? Probably not.
Dallas Kinard said:
But they didn't lol The trees do NOT work with the book. I've shown this already. I watch debates all of the time. Just because I have a point that still stands, despite what you pretend, doesn't make me lose. It means I have a point that can't be refuted. We are equally stubborn bro.
Click to expand...
That's your opinion. They have provided reasonable doubt to your evidence and showed that it could work with the official placement. Until you provide new evidence or say something even remotely different, the placement given by the official source still working with the on-screen evidence will be used.
 
Starvel said:
You have a different perspective! Cool story! Not changing the timeline. Think what you want. Said that before too

Yes it is, and as pointed out doesn't conflict with the book except in your opinion

Considered. Disagreed.

Noted. Anything new? Probably not

Could be isn't proof. Could be is a guess.

Oh I really truly do. Trees man. I got it. I'll pay attention when you have something new. Do you? Probably not.

That's your opinion. They have provided reasonable doubt to your evidence and showed that it could work with the official placement. Until you provide new evidence or say something even remotely different, the placement given by the official source still working with the on-screen evidence will be used.
Click to expand...
I was hoping you were going to DM me this, but clearly you are fine with continuing on here so let's go!
"Yes it is, and as pointed out doesn't conflict with the book except in your opinion"

The weather and orange back to green trees aren't opinion, it's something anyone can look at themselves. It's objective.

"Oh I really truly do. Trees man. I got it. I'll pay attention when you have something new. Do you? Probably not."

I've also mentioned Strange being comfortable and confident with his third eye, despite just getting it.

You've made it clear this is YOUR opinion on the timeline and you aren't open to changing it despite what official on-screen evidence shows. I'll bet if the book wasn't out yet, you'd absolutely consider what I'm saying, but the book has blinded your critical thinking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top