Dallas Kinard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,122
"yes, cos MI6 would not have reasons to do that."yes, cos MI6 would not have reasons to do that. And also again:
Smt that happens in the movies vs. smt that doesn't even exist.
Bringing out the Brainwashing thing is equal to say nothing.
You want to have Bond being multiple guys? Sure, but state it is an headcannon, and don't talk like it's official and was always what the writers intended. Cos it isn't by the simple fact that Casino Royale was advertized as a reboot.
Says who? Remember, they are a super top secret spy organization Megatron. I'm sure they do all kinds of crazy things we can only imagine.
"Smt that happens in the movies vs. smt that doesn't even exist."
Define SMT please.
"Bringing out the Brainwashing thing is equal to say nothing."
It's a theory. Do you know what that means?
"You want to have Bond being multiple guys? Sure, but state it is an headcannon, and don't talk like it's official and was always what the writers intended."
Oh so this seems to be your primary issue. I'll say it again and again and again until I'm blue, I TAKE THE OTHER FELLA LINE LITERALLY. Do you need me to spell that out for you slowly? That was an OFFICIAL line of dialogue included in the final cut of the film and I'm NOT going to just ignore it because you want me to. "head-canon" to me means my own interpretation of what I watch. So every time you use that word, just know that's how I'm taking it.
"Cos it isn't by the simple fact that Casino Royale was advertized as a reboot."
Was the term "reboot" ever mentioned officially? There is evidence in those films that it's still the same timeline....do you just ignore that? Or perhaps the writers changed their minds!