"
not in my opinion. Like I'll do an analogy, what you're syaing is that in a video game with 2 endings both are canon, just what you think is right."
Why can't this be the case? It's fiction dude. It never really happened lol
"Nope, one of them MUST be canon."
Why?
"If start with I disagree you're giving me the idea you're just ignoring canon and going into headcannon (which is fine, just say it out loud)."
Nope, I'm watching the films for myself and interpreting them with the only brain I have - my own. You are doing the same thing and we are coming to different conclusions. Happens all of the time with us pesky humans. If calling one's own interpretation of said content "headcannon" is how you define it, then sure, call it headcanon. I've used my head to interpret the evidence. Head-canon!
"i like the idea of the main character using a code-name, infact Bond uses OO7 as the code-name."
I like Taco Bell. Oh yea, I guess 007 is a code-name isn't it? Similar to "Q" and "M".
"
until me finally what?"
I guess I got distracted there. Until you admit that this is all fiction and it doesn't matter what anyone believes about it.
"And still it doesn't as their points can be explained with evidence inside the movies themself"
But I believe the evidence points to each Bond being a different guy because of on-screen dialogue spoken by Lazenby. You can ignore that and whatever else you'd like if it makes you feel better with your ideas.
"or going meta with their crew, while you're going with smt that it doesn't exist."
You keep saying smt and I don't know what you mean. The line of dialogue exists. I watched the movie.
"And if you don't like simplicity, let's go with probability, at MAX the code-name theroy can be true at 35%."
It doesn't matter what I like or dislike. The evidence on-screen is what matters to me. And where are you getting this totally arbitrary percentage from? I would think I'm either right or I'm wrong which puts me at 50% either way lol
"still one of them MUST be canon, you can't have both as canon, so again, what are your evidences?"
Alternate timelines exist in fiction bro. I've stated my primary point of evidence time and time again. Let me spell it out slowly. "THIS NEVER HAPPENS TO THE OTHER FELLA".
"And here too it's headcanon"
If that's what you want to call it, have at it bud.
"AKA Headcannon."
Again, if you want to call it that, you can call it that all day long.
"
cos they're trained for them, are you telling me that they train "every Bond" to do the hat trick or to eat the same way? (these are serious questions)."
Idk, the films never show us their training now do they? Guess you'll have to come up with your own interpretation - and have fun while doing so, this is all fiction after all. And I wasn't aware Bond "ate a different way" whatever the heck that means lol.
"or more probably (see? The word came back) because it's the same man?"
I guess it's possible, but we are talking fiction sir. If it helps you sleep better believing Connery, Lazenby, Moore, Dalton and Brosnan are the exact same dude - moles and all - then have at it, I hope you get really good sleep tonight.
"so again this isn't canon, but just your headcannon (in this case)."
You can repeat this phrase as many times as you'd like if you think it makes your point for you better. It doesn't prove or dis-prove anything.
"i don't believe in both, tho i have the time lord theory as more probable (oh again) cos it plays with the different actors"
I personally think this is ridiculous, HOWEVER if you think the time lord theory makes more sense within the world portrayed in the 007 films, then more power to you bud.
"the brainwash thing is made by the fans it's like a whole off-screen storyline, so now Goku SSJ5 and more is canon?
Right, the time-lord theory isn't made by fans at all, and in fact there's tons of on-screen evidence to support it....right? I don't watch Dragon Ball.
"Theories are mostly headcannons and never creates storylines.""
A theory is just an idea that is intended to explain facts or events. "Creating storylines" is usually up to the content creators.
"so i can take star trek and have my theory that says that kirk is a kilngon brainwashed into a human?"
You can if there's any actual evidence within the show of that. Nobody here is making stuff up out of nowhere.
"Makes that canon? Nope, tho it can be an headcannon which is FINE."
Sure, I agree you can come up with anything you want bud. Doesn't make it official of course.
"What I'm saying is that you can have fun, but say that it's headcannon in the open, like i believe, that RoboCop, Terminator and the Buffyverse are set in the AVP Universe but ik it's not canon infact i explicity stated that it is my Headcannon in that thread."
Ok here goes - I have come to the conclusion by watching the 007 films that James Bond isn't one man, but multiple different agents. My primary evidence is the line said by Lazenby's Bond when he refers to the previous 007 agent the audience is familiar with. I have used my head to try and properly interpret the canon shown to me on-screen. I therefore admit that by using my own brain to interpret what I have witnessed on-screen is "head-canon". There you go.
You can explicitly believe and state whatever you want friend. It's fiction after all, try not to take it SO seriously.
"which makes more probable the de-aging serum by your own words you resolved yourself your own aging problem, Wondefull!"
I never said the super soldier serum thing wasn't at all probable. I just need to see the evidence that supports it. Is there any you can come up with? I'm open minded.
en.wikipedia.org
