I got it too. It does read a lot better as a trade. I couldn't get into it when the issues were coming out but (partly thanks to Ice) I re-read it and something just clicked with me. The backup origin stories punctuate the main story really well.
Wha-wha, wha wha wha?E said:I got it too. It does read a lot better as a trade. I couldn't get into it when the issues were coming out but (partly thanks to Ice) I re-read it and something just clicked with me. The backup origin stories punctuate the main story really well.
Ice said:Wha-wha, wha wha wha?
Ah. You scared me there.E said:Whoops.
I meant that I couldn't get into it, but I reread thanks in part to you and found that I really liked it.
Parts of DG were good, but I just thought the whole premise was silly..
And Vulcan is the fourth summers brother. Gambit is the third, although he will probably never find this out. I think Sinister cloned him or something, I forget.
Right. Except that as I understand it, the shared past of the X Men: The End books IS canon. The point at which The End comics and 616 diverge is in the future...so the past is the same. Since the end was the ending of the 616 x men, by definition it must be the future of the 616 x men.What you're thinking of is from X-Men: The End, a mini that is non-cannon. In other words,
what's there isn't true to X-Men mytho, it's just a possible outcome of a possible future for the X-Men.
Where are you getting that about not having a shared past? Where have youseen me say anything loike that.I agree that the events that happen within The End comics are non canon.
But The End comics are hypothetical ends to characters within the 616 universe. Its not like the Marvel Zombies universe, where its obviously a different universe than 616 (i.e. Colonel Amrica). This is the hypothetical conclusion of the current 616 universe, after some diverging event happens (that happens in the future).
But the PAST of the End universe is the same as 616. Anything that happens in The End is non canonical, but any reference to the shared past IS canonical. At least as I see it.
I see your point, which is (I think) that the universes are different, so they dont share a past. I disagree with this, but short of a statement from Marvel we will have to agree to disagree about the number of Summer Brothers.
I agree that the events that happen within The End comics are non canon.
But The End comics are hypothetical ends to characters within the 616 universe. Its not like the Marvel Zombies universe, where its obviously a different universe than 616 (i.e. Colonel Amrica). This is the hypothetical conclusion of the current 616 universe, after some diverging event happens (that happens in the future).
But the PAST of the End universe is the same as 616. Anything that happens in The End is non canonical, but any reference to the shared past IS canonical. At least as I see it.
I see your point, which is (I think) that the universes are different, so they dont share a past. I disagree with this, but short of a statement from Marvel we will have to agree to disagree about the number of Summer Brothers.
you guys might be on to something theirHe has a point, Ice - that Gambit didn't *become* the 3rd Summers brother in "The End". Since the established past of the book happened in regular 616 continuity and Gambit as Summers #3 was *revealed* in an alternate future, it always has been true, and therefore is true whether The End happens or not. Same is true for Earth X. It's an alternate future, but based on established, in-continuity past.
If it has been established that the entirety of "The End", including the past, happens in an alternate universe or something, than the point is moot. As far as I know that's not the case.
This is why they shouldn't screw with alternate timelines and futures...crap stories affect the regular ones even when they try to provide an out for them not to.
you guys might be on to something their
I see this point, and its a good one, but I still disagree. I feel that even if the comic is non-canon, its revealing canonical information about a shared past. This is starting to sound asinine. Wheres that Marvel Handbook guy when we need him?The reveal isn't canon, and thus any information spat out in the series is suspect.
Whoa.. Well said.Its a pretty stupid freaking plotline anyway - seriously, randomly appearing new siblings? Lazy writing. Secret connections to each other's past? Even lazier - and the reason it isn't clear who it is is that Marvel suck *** and couldn't make up their own minds when they were writing it.
I guess I inferred that from your argument. The way I see it, if they share a past, any flahsbacks in The End happened in 616.ice said:Where are you getting that about not having a shared past? Where have youseen me say anything loike that.
Fine. Vulcan is the third and Gambit is the fourth (since he hasnt been revealed yet). Same thing.ice said:THIRD. THIRD, NOT FOURTH.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.. Are you saying that Marvel introduced a third Summers brother in a previous storyline? If so thats hillarious.By that logic, there's 5 Summers brothers because there was someone else who had the same track as Gambit then for being a Summer's brother.
Its quite simple. You say that The End is an AU that splits of sometime, Ice is saying its not connected at all. The answer is that nobody knows because Claremont is mental.I see this point, and its a good one, but I still disagree. I feel that even if the comic is non-canon, its revealing canonical information about a shared past. This is starting to sound asinine. Wheres that Marvel Handbook guy when we need him?
Oh they did it. There's an article on UXM.net somewhere, but I can't really be arsed to search for it now. Basically, the Summers were flying around in a plane for no apparent reason when they were attacked by aliens for no apparent reason. Because the Summers Senior were completely retarded and had inexplicably only packed a single parachute, they strapped both kids in (BRILLIANT IDEAS, this family. No wonder their kids are so damn stupid) and Scott was dropped on his head, which is why he can't control his powers. Because his brain has been bruised for, oh, thirty years or so now.I'm not sure I understand what you mean.. Are you saying that Marvel introduced a third Summers brother in a previous storyline? If so thats hillarious.
Summers are just the worst. Anyone's random relatives are ****. Actual relatives? I can deal with. But "Oh look, Wolverine has a brother that was never mentioned before and will never be mentioned again but is really really important" is not a good story. The bull**** plots are the absolute ****tiest part of the x-franchise.Anyways, I think both arguments have basis, but I'm sticking to my guns. I agree with what Cad said, I'm tired of Marvel thinking that new Summers relatives being constantly introduced is good storytelling.