E.Vi.L. said:If Dazzler surives, she and Warren will still be down to their second unauthorized outing that turns out horribly wrong.
It wouldn't be surprising if they were both expelled.
E.Vi.L. said:Err, not yet. But I have squatted my university longer than most. :lol:
I have a degree in political science and I've almost completed one in business administration.
It wouldn't be DATE NIGHT without the actual couple of the issue? :lol:TheManWithoutFear said:but my question is how come no one has said Scott and Jean yet?
They're right on the cover of the issue immediately following Vaughan's run...
Some people are happy MJ and Pete split but seriously some couples last and some don't. Scott and Jean should be one of those couples. Scott's more of an adult than peter is. Jean helps bring out more to him than what he used to be unlike Peter who it was just Pete and MJ, it's more of a Scott/Jean thing. I hope they don't break up.Goodwill said:Don't you wish we'd get more scenes of Scott and Jean not talking or whatever? Like, I really wish they would break up real soon. I want to see their individual characters more than the two of them growing together.
That would be nice. I am sick and tired of Scott and Jean being mostly defined by each other in the 616 Universe and to a lesser degree, in the Ultimate Universe.Goodwill said:Don't you wish we'd get more scenes of Scott and Jean not talking or whatever? Like, I really wish they would break up real soon. I want to see their individual characters more than the two of them growing together.
ourchair said:That would be nice. I am sick and tired of Scott and Jean being mostly defined by each other in the 616 Universe and to a lesser degree, in the Ultimate Universe.
It kind of reminds me of real-life couples who gradually lose their identity or personalities, or rather are incapable of projecting the personalities they have because they're so busy projecting themselves as a couple. Scott and Jean have that problem and they really need to show us how they can be interesting as separate characters, as unique individuals.
TheManWithoutFear said:Some people are happy MJ and Pete split but seriously some couples last and some don't. Scott and Jean should be one of those couples. Scott's more of an adult than peter is. Jean helps bring out more to him than what he used to be unlike Peter who it was just Pete and MJ, it's more of a Scott/Jean thing. I hope they don't break up.
If I'm not mistaken Scott is only one or two years older than Iceman. Unless of course he's one of thos slow kids.TheManWithoutFear said:I wouldn't. Isn't Scott older than them and he shares Xavier's vision more than anyone else. He wants to be a leader not friends with the kids.
I don't think wanting to see a relationship change is the same as hating the relationship.TheManWithoutFear said:I'm beginning to think the only 616 relationship you guys want in the UU is Sue and Reed.
ourchair said:If I'm not mistaken Scott is only one or two years older than Iceman. Unless of course he's one of thos slow kids.
I agree that Scott is infinitely more 'mature' than Bobby. Especially since Bobby is such a petulant little ***.TheManWithoutFear said:He probably is. I mean you do see the maturity level and the difference between Scott and Bobby. It's pretty obvious.
I know but the argument was why Cyclops would be socially seperate from the rest of the team. I meant it was because he seemed more mature than they did.ourchair said:I agree that Scott is infinitely more 'mature' than Bobby. Especially since Bobby is such a petulant little ***.
But that doesn't necessarily mean Scott is THAT much older. It could just be two to three years for all we know. The maturity gap between 15 and 18 is a completely different thing from the maturity gap between 21 and 24.
(If you do the math, 18 is 20% more mature than 15, and 24 is 14% more mature than 21. Not maturity is quanitifiable, but you get my drift)