Ice
Teh Sexy Monkey Queen
Well I e-mailed my best friend John Barber (Pool party this weekend at his house! w00t!!). We'll see what he says.
(Pool party this weekend at his house! w00t!!)
It wouldn't be real party without them.And sensual back rubs.
Yeap and I mentioned that in the e-mail saying that even though it's a rumor, maybe there's something he can mention that I'm allowed to say. 'Cuz being in the know...I know. 8)I'd be surprised if he commented on it...it's a pretty wild rumor. It's only even a yellow light at LitG.
Woah woah woah.
First of all. The "cancellation" of Ultimates 4 only means that what Loeb is doing in 3 has changed and that whatever was already drawn for 4 needed to be scraped because it didn't match up with what's going on with 3. Simple. Not because this guy's art is terrible, but because the story is being fleshed out so that it won't only effect the Ultimates title, but the universe.
Wrong on both accounts.UXM isn't that interesting right now, despite all of it's huge changes.
I'm a tad surprised to see UXM's cancellation before UFF's, though, simply based on sales. For this reason, I have a feeling that UXM will return as Ultimate X-Force, or something similar.
Wrong on both accounts.
You're wrong as well. Why don't you two wrong-os go marry each other!He's so right about UXM
You're wrong as well. Why don't you two wrong-os go marry each other!
From the June sale charts:
Qty Rank - Retail Rank - Index - Title ------------------------- Price - Ven
..
..
..
23 --------- 24 --------- 136.12 - ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #110 - $2.99 - MAR
..
..
..
34 --------- 36 --------- 110.30 - ULTIMATE X-MEN #83 -------- $2.99 - MAR
..
..
..
46 ---------- 48 -------- 95.10 -- ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR #43 - $2.99 - MAR
..
..
..
As for the UXM news? Is it because Bendis and Loeb aren't on the title? :roll:
It's an upheavel that I see as a way to reconstruct the UU, but do we have to destroy it in the process to do so?
It's an upheavel that I see as a way to reconstruct the UU, but do we have to destroy it in the process to do so? I mean, we were reading stories in USM that were pointless and blatantly filler so that Bendis and Bagley could take the cake come issue 110. It's no wonder Bagley jumped ship, really... :roll: I kind of feel like it's because of all of the lateness, too. Lateness that the editors let slide "for the quality of the story telling" at the expense of continuity. They had to know what they were doing, right? RIGHT?
It's an upheavel that I see as a way to reconstruct the UU, but do we have to destroy it in the process to do so? I mean, we were reading stories in USM that were pointless and blatantly filler so that Bendis and Bagley could take the cake come issue 110. It's no wonder Bagley jumped ship, really... :roll: I kind of feel like it's because of all of the lateness, too. Lateness that the editors let slide "for the quality of the story telling" at the expense of continuity. They had to know what they were doing, right? RIGHT?