Re: Ultimate X-Men #93 Spoilers
Well I got the issue today.
It's utter garbage. It's monumental trash.
We get a few pages of a naked Jean fighting Apocalypse in the least original or meaningful way possible. She shoots fire at him and it slowly gets to be too much and the Apoc begs her to stop.
Apoc's a battle armor? A bio-mechanical suit? But no one cares, at all. Sinister doesn't say a word he lays there in the ruined Apoc armor/suit/whatever. Jean talks to Cyke like he's garbage. "Your emotions are beneath me." Then she holds the Professor's head and restarts the world with "I expect you to start over."
Xavier's not walking now, he's back in his chair at the school. And here's where things get really....iffy in continuity which is a sheer nightmare for the timeline holder.
Jean talks about Xavier being the problem, he's the reason this happened and mutant rights are now pushed back a 100 years (why? Because Angel and Leach died? No one else died in this besides a few red shirt Morlocks). But they NEVER explain what Xavier did that caused Apocalypse.
And if Apocalypse was Sinister then that means...what? When did Xavier do anything with Sinister? Sinister was just a whack job (with maybe a bio-armor which he couldn't use until he killed 10 mutants? Tony Stark doesn't need to drink baby blood to power up why does Apoc/Sinister need to?) WHY IS THIS CHARLES'S FAULT?!?!
No one says a damn word about it. AND when does this restart happen? Well, here's a continuity mess.
Xavier's alive but the school's open to the kids and Toad is a member of the X-Men both of which only happened because Xavier died. So if Xavier never died why are they here? Beast is on the team, I thought he would be in SHIELD now if Xavier never died Beast wouldn't have been any the wiser.
IS THAT WHAT CHARLES DID? Is Beast and the Legacy Virus the thing that caused Apocalypse? If it is, some mention of it would be nice. Especially since the virus didn't create Sinister, Sinister didn't use the virus, and Apocalypse didn't use the virus. So what the hell?
Colossus is still with Jean-Paul in Chi-town which again he's only there because of Xavier's death.
So it isn't a restart in any way. "I expect you to start over" is what Jean does. And Xavier seems to believe that at the end of the chapter but besides bring Angel back to life...it seems to take place on the same day Apocalypse arose from the sewers and started tearing up New York. An idea further reinforced with a panel showing a newscast that shows the piece of New York that was effected in the battle only it's undamaged.
So, what did Jean restart? If Xavier did something that caused Apocalypse/Sinister to start their killings and all...wouldn't restarting mean going back in time BEFORE he did it instead of at the time Apocalypse would have shown up only this time for some unknown reason he doesn't?
I can't make sense of it. It's utter garbage and to think this was the story Kirkman wanted so badly to tell? This is what he did? He ruined Apocalypse for good, ruined Sinister, Bishop, Cable, and told the most retarded Ultimate X-Men story yet for WHAT?
What was the purpose of this story?
Jean's Phoenix?
**** YOU! We knew that! You couldn't have told that story with some kind of meaning and character? You had to make her transform and leave over the course of ten pages?
This was beyond bad.
Kirkman's run F.
A big ole F.
This last story ruined the only two arcs I really liked. Cable and the Aftermath one shots. It ruined good characters, it progressed NOTHING, there's no consequences to it, there's vague explanations for the whole thing happening despite everyone saying it's Xavier's fault.
Seriously, this issue gave me hepatitis, diabetes, and cancer.