So I picked up the free Ultimate Marvel Preview issue at the comic shop today. Was reading an article on Ultimates 3 (its the first page inside, first paragraph towards the end, hard to miss), and it mentions Ultimates 3 picks up TWO (2) years after Ultimates 2, not just 1 as was always assumed. Here's the quote:
Ultimate Marvel Preview issue said:
Following up on Mark Millar and Bryan Hitch's groundbreaking Ultimates and Ultimates 2, this new five-issue limited series picks up two years after we've last seen Earth's Mightiest Heroes...
It goes on to hint that this probably explains how Spider-Man is on the team (he's 18 now...say its just a little over 2 years, and it might be a willful choice for Peter to join now that they're out of SHIELD control) and why and how the characters have changed so much. So if the 2007 date in the Ultimates Saga is accurate (which now there's no reason not to consider it so), then that explains a lot of the continuity mistakes. I'm still not sure how Ultimate Power makes sense in the general Ultimate continuity (given the Peter/Kitty relationship and the Ultimates still working under SHIELD--this seemed apparent anyway). Anyway, I guess "Ultimatum" is gonna shake up the Ultimate-verse. Uh-huh. We'll see...its followed by the same preview pages we've seen online, minus the text.
Despite my previous misgivings I still find myself enjoying the books overall.
Ultimate Vision #5 was cool. The first few issues were kind of boring, but read as a whole its a pretty decent read (with #0, which is being collected in trade despite Marvel's claims that it never would reprint it--course that probably went completely out the window with them reprinting it as Ultimate Vision #0). It juggled some pretty cool scientific concepts with an at least decent story overall.
There's some blah blah about Ultimate Iron Man II, but who really cares? And if you do, go to the comic shop and pick this thing up yourself...its free. It also has some art, some pencils and inks which look really nice. No colors, and thankfully no dialogue. Probably the last time I'll ever be able to enjoy the pages (without dialogue its really great--little bit more of a defined, slightly anime-ish tone to the armor).
It has a solicit of Ultimate Human, and a couple pages of art from it (again, no dialogue). Its great stuff, especially the pencils! I preferred them to the colored version (though I can't wait to see the penciled page inked and in color).
USM has been steadily good since Immonen came on. First, it talks about the Death of a Goblin. Then it goes into the Amazing Friends arc. I'm wary about that arc though. After the AF arc, its revealed there will be:
"...a couple of intriguing single issue stories, then its a very large story that adapts and expands on the plot of the USM video game and that includes the return of Venom & Carnage."
WTF? According to Bendis himself the video game takes place "around issue 46". Now instead its making up an expanded arc adaptation of the game? So then, technically, it takes place around #123-#130...not #46. Unless the arc is a flashback to then...or its a retcon...whatever. We'll see how it plays out. At least it should put to rest the debate over whether the game is canon or not. The Preview also features inked pencils by Immonen from #116. Again, awesome stuff.
Info on UFF shows the next arc is called Four Cubed, the arc in which Thanos, Ronan, and everyone else from the God War arc return. It then features some pencils of the recently released UFF #48.
The UXM info talks about the Shadow King story in #89, then the Apocalypse story starts with #90.
The rest is minimal info on Ultimatum (or the issues leading up to it...nothing about the title itself). Finally there's two pages of art from Ultimate Origins. Most of the pages (they fit 3 onto the final page) we've already seen. The new one (at least to me) was of a war-time battle. Its most likely WWII, the origin of Cap, etc; its also possible it could tie into Vietnam, and perhaps Nick Fury's past, etc. It was said Origins would span a large amount of time, from the 30's (possible even earlier) to the present.
Anyway, some helpful info for the timeline. Glad I picked it up. At least Loeb seems to be following continuity/timeline, etc pretty close. Hmmmm...I wonder...