Pro Bot
Well-Known Member

What I Heard This Week: A New Sony Spinoff - Murphy's Multiverse
Sony looks to bring Jamie Foxx back in a solo Electro project

Is it SPUMC or TASM?
Or both?
IDK, maybe Sony use Electro from Earth-120703 or a reboot from SSU, how i just said, i don't knowErm... don't know whether to post this here or in Sony's Spider-Man Universe. It's interesting, but we'll see if it actually happens.![]()
What I Heard This Week: A New Sony Spinoff - Murphy's Multiverse
Sony looks to bring Jamie Foxx back in a solo Electro projectwww.murphysmultiverse.com
Is it SPUMC or TASM?
Or both?![]()
just give me More Of The Earth-12O703's Spider-Man and so the Raimi's Fans With Toby's Spider-ManIDK, maybe Sony use Electro from Earth-120703 or a reboot from SSU, how i just said, i don't know
Yeah. Either the same version, (NWH Spoilers) with his powers back, or a new version similar to Adrian Toomes/Vulture in Morbius.IDK, maybe Sony use Electro from Earth-120703 or a reboot from SSU, how i just said, i don't know
sound like ether fake Spider-Man or clone saga has happen in both universe ?just give me More Of The Earth-12O703's Spider-Man and so the Raimi's Fans With Toby's Spider-Man
Just a note: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (Video Game) is an alternate universe.
The fact that it covers the second film completely differently, that makes sense, but I'll leave that here.
You could add an "alternate timelines" section listing them:I wish this was said about all non-canon video games, to be honest. Better to be a canonical alternate reality than just void.
Yes as team 2 took 2 year later in mid 2014TASM 2012 takes place in 2012
I can't find that 2013 car registration or the calendars you mention in the movie. and the daily bugle tumbler could have been wrong, sometimes the marketing campaigns are not chronologically correct like the dark knight's marketing campaign, on the gcpd page they said that the attack of the narrows occurred in the fall of 2006 and in gotham tonight that at the end of 2007 and in the novelization that before December. The most accurate date would be the newspaper of the movie, it is props that are clearly displayed on the screen. Where it says that they are in 2012 also agrees with its year of release and setting. The most canonical is the movie.There's actually an explanation for that on the page already.
Peter tiene 7 años al comienzo de la película. Fuente (a las 1:15) pero es extraño ya que dicen que sus padres han estado ausentes durante 12 años, lo que haría que Peter tuviera 19 años.
No has puesto ninguna explicacion solida mas alla de unos calendarios que cuadran con algunos meses del 2012 y 2012, no encuentro dicha matricula de taxi y el marketing de tasm 2 que bien podria estar mal como el del caballero oscuro.En realidad, ya hay una explicación para eso en la página.
bro this timeline sucksThere's actually an explanation for that on the page already.
Isn't that Sony's fault?bro this timeline sucks
Peter was 7 when his parents left, then 12 years passed so he would be 19 in tasm 1, there are 12 years difference between those parts, not 11 as you suggest