Superman Returns movie discussion *Spoilers*

[Dr.Strangefate]

Mole is CRAZY

 

[Random]

Sure they might be a valid irk to you.....but in the larger scheme of the film's flaws....they don't add up to anything substantial that would hold weight in this arguement.

One of the reasons I dont even read his posts on subjects like this anymore, unless I spot a quote from me in there

 

[SSJmole]

That's what I say. Mole is crazy.

Mole is CRAZY

Maybe I'm normal and you are all crazy , did you ever think of that?

 

[Bass]

All the time.

That's why my bed is so wet.

 

[SSJmole]

All the time.

That's why my bed is so wet.

:lol: :lol:

 

[Dancanread]

How would y'all feel about the sequel to this being written by.....


MARK MILLAR?


Nope, not joking.

EDIT: crap. just noticed the other thread. old news already.

 

[Random]

How would y'all feel about the sequel to this being written by.....


MARK MILLAR?


Nope, not joking.

Might want to check out the Sequel thread

EDIT: Crap you beat me, DAMN YOU DANCANREAD!

 

[Dancanread]

EDIT: Crap you beat me, DAMN YOU DANCANREAD!

MWAHAHAHAHA!!! I am the king of...correcting...myself.


:?

 

[bluebeast]

I liked Returns. There.

 

[thee great one]

Kevin Spacey was the greatest Luthor ever.

 

[Ice]

Kevin Spacey was the greatest Luthor ever.

The only thing worthwhile from the movie was him as Luthor.

 

[ourchair]

But the date was February THAT year. So the only time she could win it would be the year AFTER the film.

First, you had a problem with the film taking place seven months after the article was printed. Then you have a problem with the article being printed too late to get a Pulitzer.

Stop revising. Choose an argument and stick with it.

Imagine the passion of the christ if jesus had been wearing a sports watch. You see?

That would make Passion of the Christ BETTER.

Of course, the betterness would vary depending on what BRAND of watch he was wearing, but still.

 

[SSJmole]

First, you had a problem with the film taking place seven months after the article was printed. Then you have a problem with the article being printed too late to get a Pulitzer.

Stop revising. Choose an argument and stick with it.

I did stick with it. I didn't mention the too late to get a Pulitzer as I figured it was self explanatory. Sorry but you have to admit it is still a mistake.

 

[bluebeast]

Can we just stop with the stupid arguments? We all know Mole isn't going to change his opinion (Which is his right) and no one else will change theirs. This movie came out two years ago and you're all still arguing about it. If you want to talk about Superman Returns then bring up something new besides 'It sucked' or 'No way, this is why it was good'. Personally I found it to be an enjoyable film and while it had several flaws and weak points I still think that it had just as many good points. Now let's try and be civil.

(Puts in application to E to be mod:wink: )

 

[ourchair]

(Puts in application to E to be mod:wink: )

:lol: :lol: :lol:

+150 Ourchair Points just for the sheer Machiavellian-ness of it all.

 

[moonmaster]

I liked Returns. There.

As did I.

And as did a whole lot of other people on this site, as evidenced by that big poll at the top of the page.

 

[Joe Kalicki]

As did I.

And as did a whole lot of other people on this site, as evidenced by that big poll at the top of the page.

Well, I didn't like it, and I count.

I mean, David Blue? Dr. Draco? Come on.

 

[Planet-man]

Then vote, Joe, vote! You don't count unless you vote!

My initial raiting of 2 stars out of 5 isn't accurate, though. With many further viewings I'd give it a 4 as a film on it's own. In terms of potential, though, it's still only a 1 or a 2..

 

[Joe Kalicki]

Okay, 2. For effects and skill.

 

[SSJmole]

Then vote, Joe, vote! You don't count unless you vote!

My initial raiting of 2 stars out of 5 isn't accurate, though. With many further viewings I'd give it a 4 as a film on it's own. In terms of potential, though, it's still only a 1 or a 2..

I gave it 1