Gothamite
Well-Known Member
I don't even think "the vision" is even that important.
In fact, I find it faintly ridiculous that pop culture properties, especially when they become long-lived and extended across mutliple decades by multiple creators, must focus solely on the notion of "the vision" as if the authorial intent of a creation is more important than the possibilities of that creation.
It doesn't matter what Roddenberry "visioned" Star Trek to be, but what Roddenberry and the various creators and contributors to those 70-something episodes of TOS did well. From there any body else who wants to do new things with Trek should not focus on what can be done to ADD to that, not continuously perpetuate what has already been done while trying to second-guess the intentions of the author.
Bingo. We wouldn't have Batman, Superman or James Bond today if more people didn't think this way.