Re: Sherlock
Should we mark this thread as having spoilers?
For me, Moriarty was the weakest thing out of the three. But Benedict Cumberpatch and Martin Freeman have been a true joy. I have high hopes for the next season and the return of Moriarty, because I have confidence the actor will nail him.
I thought he was pretty interesting and I liked how he was actually Irish. His upper-class Dublin accent reminded me of a lot of the eccentric yuppie genius snobs I've encountered a lot growing up. I would imagine Moriarty's ego would have him want Sherlock knowing where he's from.
There certainly was a few moments where he over-acted, but none of his deliveries seemed totally implausible.
Interestingly, I'd already figured out who Moriarty was before I even watched the episode, thanks to
Molly's blog and
Sherlock's website.
I really thought the second episode was unforgiveably filler. From the very start of the episode where John's asking Sherlock about "that case in X" I was irritated, because it implied that the series was just jumping into a relaxed status quo a considerable amount of days or weeks after the events first episode, instead of relying more on the assumption that the viewers are familiar with the specific plot details of the first episode and are willing to accept a bit more continuity (as was the case with the third episode). This kind of thing is a really dated approach to television and I was surprised that they would do it that way.
Either way, these three episodes have had a rather massive impact on me and I can't wait for the series to continue. Having read only a handful of Holmes literature, Cumberbatch is far more like the smarmy eccentric I imagined (complete with safe, uncomplicated, but still cool fashion choices) than the overly suave, debonair RDj portrayal (who was unforgettably stylish in that film).
And Martin Freeman is probably even better performance-wise. I totally buy him as a shell-shocked veteran and his everyman Tim Canterbury-like expressions are hilarious in the face of all the madness going on around him.
I think that like Casino Royale for James Bond, this is the best possible modernisation they could have done for Sherlock Holmes. Honestly I'm surprised they haven't tried something like this before. (The last set of Holmes adaptations that had a 'modern' setting were the Rathbone/Bruce Universal films of the 1940s).