DIrishB
The Timeline Guy
Man, it's so awesome.
It is. Thank God for torrents...else I'd likely never have had the chance to read this.
Man, it's so awesome.
So I've read the first twelve issues of this title...I really enjoy it. I'm worried I won't enjoy Gaiman's issues as much as I have Moore's however.
I'm finally getting my head around the complex legal issues regarding Marvel/Miracleman and it's actually quite interesting when you understand it. It's almost a bit surprising that DC haven't just jumped in and sued all of the claims of ownership into oblivion since the character is just a shameless copy of Shazam to begin with and they own all rights to him, now. If DC did get all rights to Miracleman, I'm sure they'd treat the property with respect and they'd release some comprehensive trade paperbacks.
Also: I think the "how do you pronounce 'Rorschach'?" argument may have a rival in "how do you pronounce 'kimota'?". Kim-OH-tah or Kim-uh-TAH?
Yeap. I remember reading that when Gaiman works with Marvel, the proceeds go to help him with the copyright issues to Miracleman. I believe it was talked about sometime after 1602 and before Eternals.But yeah, it's a very interesting situation. Neil Gaiman started an LLC just to deal with the copyright issues and the proceeds from 1602 and I *think* Eternals went to that company.
Also: I think the "how do you pronounce 'Rorschach'?" argument may have a rival in "how do you pronounce 'kimota'?". Kim-OH-tah or Kim-uh-TAH?
Todd MacFarlane's dickery really annoys me where all of this is concerned. I really can't understand why he's so keen on Miracleman (a character he's never even worked on) being in his stories; when he could just have his own shameless copy of Shazam. From what I can gather, having Miracleman in his stories doesn't really make any difference except to rattle the cage where the legal stuff is concerned. From a storytelling perspective, it's pretty trivial.
E said:Name recognition. It was an extremely critically acclaimed series and he wanted the name for 2 new books he was launching (with profoundly retarded titles - I don't recall the names but I think one was 'Todd McFarlane's Weird Tales' or something like that).
I've finished Moore's run and I really can't see why I should bother reading Gaiman's.
You found issues of Miracleman in a cheap issue bin???
E said:Because he continues it in a perfect way, and never tries to top Moore or anything that happened in that run. Give it a chance.