Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

Maybe I'm confused but I don't understand the point you're trying to make
every universe is different than one another.

Like the Comic "Spider-Man: Life Story" is different than Earth-616, so idk how the "MCU is different than the Comics" isn't refearing to smt like that.

it's all done by Marvel in the end, we aren't putting in the same universe Star Wars with Star Trek
 
you said this:


So we have the TVA comic reality wich is 99% as the MCU timeline. So ehm... at this point why don't have both? It seems reductant and useless to have 2 almost identical realities.
But if they are 2 different identical realities, then they're still different. One is the MCU and one is not.

Also, by your logic, we should include every MCU inspired comic too. Since those are the exact same as the MCU but not quite.
 
But if they are 2 different identical realities, then they're still different. One is the MCU and one is not.

Also, by your logic, we should include every MCU inspired comic too. Since those are the exact same as the MCU but not quite.
infact I include them on my timeline, aside the ones that are impossible to include lol.
 
every universe is different than one another.

Like the Comic "Spider-Man: Life Story" is different than Earth-616, so idk how the "MCU is different than the Comics" isn't refearing to smt like that.

it's all done by Marvel in the end, we aren't putting in the same universe Star Wars with Star Trek
I'm mean, sure? But I feel like you haven't seen the full quote so you're taking it out of context. And again, the point your making isn't really relevant.. to anything we're talking about.
 
But if they are 2 different identical realities, then they're still different. One is the MCU and one is not.

Also, by your logic, we should include every MCU inspired comic too. Since those are the exact same as the MCU but not quite.
to me this is like a "Power Rangers Comics/TV Situation".
 
And you can do whatever you want but the MCU timeline shouldn't include non MCU
they're tecnically still licensed works, I'm not talking about fan-fiction.

Also remember that Comics > MCU in terms of importance on a larger scale.
 
Licensed work does not equal MCU
depends, like Iron Man Fast Friends is a licenced MCU work, it was done by Marvel and made at the time to be set within the MCU, (even tho it can still be canon). So it's still part of the MCU Brand.

Like Star Wars Disney and legends EU are different timelines, but part of the same licensing aspects. Hope I clirified what i meant.
 
depends, like Iron Man Fast Friends is a licenced MCU work, it was done by Marvel and made at the time to be set within the MCU, (even tho it can still be canon). So it's still part of the MCU Brand.

Like Star Wars Disney and legends EU are different timelines, but part of the same licensing aspects. Hope I clirified what i meant.
Unless it has a Red Stamp(with a few exceptions) it is not MCU. Licensed by Marvel Studios, does not mean licensed MCU.
 
Unless it has a Red Stamp(with a few exceptions) it is not MCU. Licensed by Marvel Studios, does not mean licensed MCU.
I don't see Eternals the 500 years war to have one, but it is still a licensed and spin-off products.

It doesn't need to be canon to be licensed, even the non-canon Viva Las Vegas is a licensed MCU work.

The Video Games tie-in too.
 
I don't see Eternals the 500 years war to have one, but it is still a licensed and spin-off products.

It doesn't need to be canon to be licensed, even the non-canon Viva Las Vegas is a licensed MCU work.

The Video Games tie-in too.
Again, I addressed the few exceptions fact, and you don't seem to be understanding.

Licensed Marvel Studios ≠ Licensed MCU
 

Latest posts

Back
Top