No no it's all good lol I thought they were on the same branch to for a src
Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)
- Thread starter Starvel
- Start date
I've just placed it with the TVA stuff until further information is revealed
Zeitschiene
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
- Messages
- 437
Not sure if I like that
I'm don't like it either really, but it doesn't have a place yet and it's better than nothing.
Zeitschiene
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
- Messages
- 437
Anyone planing on a Bootbuilding DeppDive ?
Zeitschiene
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
- Messages
- 437
Deep
selfishmisery
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 4,189
Last edited:
selfishmisery
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 4,189
So here's my take after rewatching that scene:
They were all grouped at that boat building place because it was a one-stop shop for them to pick up time bombs, destroy timelines, then yeet on back - rinse and repeat until all the branches were gone. All while Dox was stationed at that same boat yard guiding them where to go.
So they knew they clearly couldn't do it in the TVA dimension so they did it at a random location in the sacred timeline.
Let me clarify: where they set up shop was NOT being destroyed. It was a hiding stop where they could grab their stuff, prune then return.
They were all grouped at that boat building place because it was a one-stop shop for them to pick up time bombs, destroy timelines, then yeet on back - rinse and repeat until all the branches were gone. All while Dox was stationed at that same boat yard guiding them where to go.
So they knew they clearly couldn't do it in the TVA dimension so they did it at a random location in the sacred timeline.
Let me clarify: where they set up shop was NOT being destroyed. It was a hiding stop where they could grab their stuff, prune then return.
I would probably put that at an undetermined year between 2018 and 2023 considering how 'present' the threat was.
@Starvel
If you have multiple things in a row dated "????" like here, it is better to list them together under the same one to avoid redundancies.
Like this:
????
**Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. 7x07: "The Totally Excellent Adventures of Mack and the D" (0:06:40 - 0:09:07)** [Earth-TRN810]
**Loki 2x01: "Ouroboros" (0:39:41 - 0:40:56)** [Branched Timeline]
**Loki 2x02: "Breaking Brad" (0:30:31 - 0:37:49)** [Branched Timeline]
**Loki 2x02: "Breaking Brad" (0:42:20 - 0:43:25)** [Branched Timeline]
If you have multiple things in a row dated "????" like here, it is better to list them together under the same one to avoid redundancies.
Like this:
????
**Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. 7x07: "The Totally Excellent Adventures of Mack and the D" (0:06:40 - 0:09:07)** [Earth-TRN810]
**Loki 2x01: "Ouroboros" (0:39:41 - 0:40:56)** [Branched Timeline]
**Loki 2x02: "Breaking Brad" (0:30:31 - 0:37:49)** [Branched Timeline]
**Loki 2x02: "Breaking Brad" (0:42:20 - 0:43:25)** [Branched Timeline]
Yes sorry I meant to change this today after what Selfishmisery said yesterday, I'll edit that now
Cool. You're doing great work so far btw.
Thank you! I appreciate everyone bearing with me as I learn lol
Pro Bot
Well-Known Member
If you ever need help with the timecodes, don't be afraid to ask.
I'm curious to hear what people's thoughts are on the book placing "Blonsky Targets Bruce" after the Monaco attack. This would place a big jump between Tony returning from Monaco (the book says Monaco is May 5th, 2010 and the movie shows the following day as 05.06.10) and his birthday party. On the one hand, it does give Vanko more time to work on his drones for Hammer, but at the same time, the movie makes it feel like Tony's prognosis is more urgent. Here's what I'm thinking for now. If it's in quotes, it's how the book describes it.
May 1st, 2010- "Stark's Big Show" (The Stark Expo begins, the book shows Spring 2010).
May 2nd, 2010- "Privatizing World Peace" (Senate Hearing, the book shows Spring 2010).
May 3rd, 2010- "Pepper Potts Promoted" (Book shows Spring 2010).
May 4th, 2010- "Black Widow, Undercover" (Natasha is hired as Tony's assistant, Book shows Spring 2010).
May 5th, 2010- "The Grand Prix Assault" (The book shows May 5th, 2010).
May 6th, 2010- Tony returns home from Monaco (The movie shows 05.06.10).
May 7th, 2010- "Blonsky Targets Banner" (Including this to show how the book places it after the prior events, the book also shows Spring 2010).
May 23rd, 2010- Tony's Birthday Party (Now that the 29th date isn't as set as we believed, I think we can go off the days of the week included in What-If. So, with What-If saying the next day is a Monday, this would be a Sunday. This date is also the earliest day to line up with TIH's 17-day jump and if you want it can also work with the 29th date for Tony's actual birthday if you just assume Tony had his party around a week early.
May 24th, 2010- 17 Days after "Blonsky Targets Banner", Bruce arrives at Culver University.
May 1st, 2010- "Stark's Big Show" (The Stark Expo begins, the book shows Spring 2010).
May 2nd, 2010- "Privatizing World Peace" (Senate Hearing, the book shows Spring 2010).
May 3rd, 2010- "Pepper Potts Promoted" (Book shows Spring 2010).
May 4th, 2010- "Black Widow, Undercover" (Natasha is hired as Tony's assistant, Book shows Spring 2010).
May 5th, 2010- "The Grand Prix Assault" (The book shows May 5th, 2010).
May 6th, 2010- Tony returns home from Monaco (The movie shows 05.06.10).
May 7th, 2010- "Blonsky Targets Banner" (Including this to show how the book places it after the prior events, the book also shows Spring 2010).
May 23rd, 2010- Tony's Birthday Party (Now that the 29th date isn't as set as we believed, I think we can go off the days of the week included in What-If. So, with What-If saying the next day is a Monday, this would be a Sunday. This date is also the earliest day to line up with TIH's 17-day jump and if you want it can also work with the 29th date for Tony's actual birthday if you just assume Tony had his party around a week early.
May 24th, 2010- 17 Days after "Blonsky Targets Banner", Bruce arrives at Culver University.
So either Kent in England or a shipyard in Norway.
Megatron
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2022
- Messages
- 1,841
The 6th Cosmos depicted in the comic about Galactus' origins Is completely different than the MCU.
Megatron
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2022
- Messages
- 1,841
selfishmisery
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 4,189
We mainly only see his home planet so that doesnt discount my theory.
Taa
Taa was a paradise-like planet from the Sixth Cosmos, said to be the most advanced of its time. It was the home of Galan, a space explorer who would survive the end of the Sixth Cosmos and become Galactus in the next cycle.[1] Many Taa-ans were Scienceers, including Galan's mom, Scienceer...
Regardless, any "corrections" you might have are futile since you are basically discrediting a personal perspective of mine that can't be proven for a fact in canon either way. I know my Marvel lore better than a quick Wiki search, dude.
Last edited:
Megatron
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2022
- Messages
- 1,841
Dude, I Read Marvel's comic since I was Born. I think I'm the only One in the world that Read the original 40s human Torch comic books. (Both Marvel Comics and his personal series, since It was a big deal in Marvel's). I Read this One too. I Just didn't Remember the name of the comic.We mainly only see his home planet so that doesnt discount my theory.
Taa
Taa was a paradise-like planet from the Sixth Cosmos, said to be the most advanced of its time. It was the home of Galan, a space explorer who would survive the end of the Sixth Cosmos and become Galactus in the next cycle.[1] Many Taa-ans were Scienceers, including Galan's mom, Scienceer...marvel.fandom.com
Regardless, any "corrections" you might have are futile since you are basically discrediting a personal perspective of mine that can't be proven for a fact in canon either way. I know my Marvel lore better than a quick Wiki search, dude.
And anyway, I didn't Say to you, it's impossible or "discreting a personal perspective". I Just sayed that it's unlikely to be true. Which it's very different than impossible.
