I absolutely prefer DC movies to Marvel movies, but it's probably a bias thing. Superman: The Movie's helicopter scene is by and large, my favourite scene in a motion picture. NONE of the Marvel movies have been able to capture the magic of a superhero as well as that one scene from 1978.
I gotta agree. When I talk about superhero films, I generally mean those of 1999 and on. I don't count the 1978 Superman or the 1989 Batman, both of which are the best superhero films made.
I also think (and so many of my peers agree with me) that Batman Begins trounces every single last damn one of the Marvel movies. Coming out of Spider-Man, I was saying, "Wow, what a great movie!". Coming out of Batman Begins, I said nothing. In fact, I think I was about to go into cardiac arrest from an overload of fanboy excitement.
My all-time favourite cinema-related moment was when my friends and I were coming out of Begins and they apologised most sincerely to me, for all the years they had spent making fun of my Bat-fandom.
Yeah, as far as I can tell, three people don't like Batman Begins. Me, my brother, and a guy I met in Bath. Everyone loves it. Even my friends who don't like comics or Batman love it.
I think it's dull and incredibly boring. It's not bad - in fact, it should be quite good, but I watch it and I'm bored from start to finish. :?
Lastly, even though I really like Superman Returns and I'll defend it wholeheartedly; at the end of the day it's not the movie that should have been made and everything they say in the parodies is pretty much bang-on. Superman shouldn't be an illegitimate father, the plot shouldn't have been about Kryptonite (at least, not so much) and after twenty friggin' years, there should at least have been a goddamn supervillain, not to mention that it shouldn't have had as many ties to the previous films.
I agree here too. The annoying thing is that the kryptonite block would've been fine if they hadn't decided kryptonite just 'stopped' killing him when he went to pick it up. I had a fix for the ending that I think is much better. I also think the kid was stupid, but not for the reasons everyone else does.
The problem with the kid is that he's a set up for Superman Returns II: The Returning. He doesn't
do anything in Superman Returns. Literally. He has no function in the film. If you removed him, there would be no alteration to the story, bar one scene where they find Superman after the stabbing. He's a complete waste of time in the film because Singer and his writing team forgot to give him a reason to be in
that film. He's there so that in the sequel he can be a major player, but it defeats the point to set something up when you don't do anything with it. It would've been better to put the kid story that they obviously want to do in Returns or to just ditch it. Instead, we got this nonsense of Superman being an illegitimate stalker.
What's worse, Superman in the film is a creepy stalker. He's a creepy stalker that knocked up Lois Lane.
That thinks he's Jesus. :roll:
(The Jesus rant is for another time.)
But there was
so much right with that film. The three main rescues; the plane, the boat, and Metropolis were superb. The actors were really good. Lex Luthor's plan was a brilliant idea. And I am convinced that had he resolved the kryptonite block in a better fashion, it would've been a hit, because Lex did all the things a supervillain needed to do.
I also think the links to the previous films were not only completely unobtrusive, but brilliantly handled. It felt like a remake more than a sequel, and it was wonderful. It felt like a
Superman film. Superman rescues people while Lex Luthor pulls off the greatest crime of the century, involving some sort of real estate scam. Absolutely perfect.
Spider-Man deals with his girlfriend being held hostage by someone who wants to kill him, Batman deals with some crazy guy intent on turning Gotham City into his personal hellhole, and Superman deals with villains causing huge natural disasters that threaten innocent lives. Hells yes.