:shock: You make me sick.
Underworld and Underworld: Revolution
Dracula: Dead and Loving It
Same thing with those choices dude they make me sick :lol:
:shock: You make me sick.
Underworld and Underworld: Revolution
Dracula: Dead and Loving It
:shock: You make me sick.
Bram Stoker's and Lost Boys were good though.
Interview with a Vampire
Salem's Lot
Underworld and Underworld: Revolution
Blade I and II
My Best Friend is a Vampire
John Carpenter's Vampires
Dracula: Dead and Loving It
Coming Soon:
I Am Legend
God, they just got so bad as Anne Rice got progressively more retarded. The third one was really the last of them that was coherent and...God. God. There are just no words for that woman's mental illness, or her lack of any writing talent beyond the ability to create atmosphere. You can't have a book made entirely of atmospheres woman! Just no!That is no excuse... Sure Stuart Townsend played up the dark mysterious and sexy aspect, but Cruise was the far better actor, and stayed much closer to what Lestat was supposed to be in the first book.
My biggest problem with Interview with a Vampire was Antonio Banderas as Armand. Armand is supposed to be eternally 15 or 16... It adds so much to the character to have him be so old and so lost and yet so young.
The Vampire Lestat is by far the best book in the series... But I've read and loved them all... Even the delightfully heretical Memnoch the Devil, where Lestat literally drinks the blood of Christ.
How come no one's mentioned Vampire in Brooklyn?
I haven't seen it, but there's a radio host in Chicago, Buzz Killman, who loves it. It's his favorite movie. He used to give it out as a prize in some contest.
Oh, he's real all right.
He doesn't have his own show anymore, but when he did it freakin' RULED!
He's back with Steve Dahl now though, unfortunately.
He should be partnered with Roald Dahl.
That would be awesome.
How come no one's mentioned Vampire in Brooklyn?