MaxwellSmart said:
He sees it this way. Lets say a cop saw a bad guy rob a liquor store, he decides to persue. The bad guy jumps in a car and they get into a chase. During the chase the bad guy plows through the playground of an elementary school and kills a dozen kids. Is the cop guilty of a dozen counts of involuntary manslaughter because he didn't call in for backup?
If the cop was a civilian instead (like Speedball is), yes. Manslaughter. Since he's a cop trained and legally sanctionned to enforce the law, probably not. But he'll likely have to face disciplinary charge if it turns out he was reckless and didn't follow proper procedure.
For example, most police corp nowadays in this case would require their officer to drop the pursuit if it risks endangering civilians. There are many other ways to catch a robber that won't involve driving at break neck speed in a school zone.
MaxwellSmart said:
And who's to say that if he had it still wouldn't have happened?
No one, but if he had followed procedure and a tragedy still occured, he's covered. By definition, involuntary manslaughter involve negligence or incompetence.
If Speedball had called for backup, if an assault plan accounting for Nitro's power had been set in place and that the arrest still resulted in hundreds of death, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
But they just charged in with no plan, without preparation, and 600 people got killed. Speedball isn't even a scapegoat in this case ; he was the leader and ordered that hare brained assault. Of course he's accountable.
---
BTW : I don't dispute that Speedball sees it as you described. You are right about that. But Speedball is wrong. He is accountable and has to grow up and own up to it. Starting with taking the deal Jen offered, admit to his part in the tragedy, and try to help make it right. A public statement admitting that the kind of amateurish vigilantism he was indulging in is wrong and has to stop wouldn't hurt either.