Joe Kalicki
Well-Known Member
does THAT make any sense?
Still no.
does THAT make any sense?
Still no.
I get it.
I understand.
I picked up the JLU DVDs the other day.
Personnaly, I think that while the second season is the end of JLU, the first season is the end for the DCAU in general.
Does that make sense?
OK, I'm not very good at this sort of thing, but I'll try...
S1 of JLU brought virtually every aspect of the DCAU together to wrap up the loose ends...all culminating in the Cadmus arc. Even if Cadmus had been the end of the series, it would have been a fantastic ending, with the revalation of Terry's legacy and the League finding new purpose.
S2, while just as good as the previous season, simply had a straight-out Superfriends tribute, which, in my mind, is the perfect ending to JLU.
does THAT make any sense?
Sorry. It's just....seriously, with Timm's animation, if Batman took off his costume he would look almost exactly like Superman, save for butt-chin and spitcurl. Furthermore, the characters are too blocky-looking, and it's downright unattractive.
I've never found the various ways they tried to distinguish Bruce, Bats and Superman from each other particularly bothersome... even though it's pretty obvious what would be considered better or worse.I completely agree in that one (and only that one) regard. It annoyed me when they streamlined the style, because Bruce and Superman look too similar. But for me, it's a minor detail, one I can very easily get past.
I've never found the various ways they tried to distinguish Bruce, Bats and Superman from each other particularly bothersome... even though it's pretty obvious what would be considered better or worse.
In my opinion, it was fine at the start when there was no Superman cartoon and what was important was that Bruce look like a relentlessly bored bachelor with a handsome lantern-jaw going through the motions of maintaining a billion dollar empire. Otherwise there would be no contrast between him and Batman. The DCAU people didn't just rely on Conroy's voice but on everything that goes from the upper half of his face.
But I think the moment they gave Wayne ice blue eyes and a firm lip was a pretty definitive visual move to contrast him once more heroes entered the picture. It signaled a larger universe and a fading need to focus on Bruce Wayne so much. While Bruce Wayne vs. Batman might be important in his own series, for all storytelling intents and purposes thereonforward, Bruce is ALWAYS Batman. At least as far as the icey eyes go.
I completely agree in that one (and only that one) regard. It annoyed me when they streamlined the style, because Bruce and Superman look too similar. But for me, it's a minor detail, one I can very easily get past.
You are such a post whore.blah blah blah
blah blah blah
cartoons
You are such a post whore.
This post served no purpose other than to boost said count and you know it. You and VVD should have a postwhore-off.
I disagree.
(+1)
You are such a post whore.
This post served no purpose other than to boost said count and you know it. You and VVD should have a postwhore-off.
WHORE!!!
How the **** do you get so many posts man....
I don't understand the Question. Literally, I don't get his deal. I don't understand his powers.