ourchair
Well-Known Member
I get what Bass is saying.
At least I'd like to think I do.
I could be wrong, after all.
Also, I find it ridiculous that an entire medium is reduced to a single age/maturity demographic while it's absolutely ridiculous to suggest the same of other mediums.
For example, the 'potential' of comics is for kids, adolescents or people with arrested emotional development, but TV is for everybody! I mean, come on.
That's like saying classical music is only for senior citizens! Well, okay, poor example, but you know what I mean.
I try as much as possible to refer to comic books as 'comic books'. Not graphic novels or sequential art or the ninth art or fumetti or whatever, but 'comic books'
I understand that most of those terms are probably more accurate from a semantic and syntactic perspective, but I think that it acts as an idiot screen.
I'm serious. If anybody presumes to condescend to the word 'comic book' then I'm not sure if I can trust their intellectual integrity.
At least I'd like to think I do.
I could be wrong, after all.
Also, I find it ridiculous that an entire medium is reduced to a single age/maturity demographic while it's absolutely ridiculous to suggest the same of other mediums.
For example, the 'potential' of comics is for kids, adolescents or people with arrested emotional development, but TV is for everybody! I mean, come on.
That's like saying classical music is only for senior citizens! Well, okay, poor example, but you know what I mean.
I try as much as possible to refer to comic books as 'comic books'. Not graphic novels or sequential art or the ninth art or fumetti or whatever, but 'comic books'
I understand that most of those terms are probably more accurate from a semantic and syntactic perspective, but I think that it acts as an idiot screen.
I'm serious. If anybody presumes to condescend to the word 'comic book' then I'm not sure if I can trust their intellectual integrity.