Dancanread
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
- Messages
- 1,638
not bad.
Batman however does look decent.
I... LIKE Bagley.
Not insanely so, but still.
That is all.
People gripe about Immonen's faces...Most of Bagley's faces look generally the same, and he's incredibly inconsistent with characters' faces from one panel to the next.
People gripe about Immonen's faces...Most of Bagley's faces look generally the same, and he's incredibly inconsistent with characters' faces from one panel to the next.
At least they look like actual faces
If I wasn't such a mark for Immonen I'd say "BURN" or "TOUCHE".
If I wasn't such a mark.
I agree with this.People gripe about Immonen's faces...Most of Bagley's faces look generally the same, and he's incredibly inconsistent with characters' faces from one panel to the next.
Victor Von Doom said:I also agree with this.My thoughts exactly.
But in Immonen's defense, his art style can vary so much that he leaves Bags WAAAAAAY in the dust. I'm still of sound mind and think Immonen's "Superman: Secret Identity" is still one of the most beautiful books I've ever seen.
Immonen's cartoon style is still vibrant, expressive, kinetic and overall amazing....but I can see why people can complain about his "faces". Personally, they don't bother me not one bit. At least his characters look different and I can tell one from the other.
Immonen is miles ahead of Bags as an artist, but I don't think it's a reason to hate on Bags.
I agree with this.
But I ALSO like Immonen, way before it was cool to do so on this site.