I'm no science guy, but I was just wondering, if Gah Lak Tus is a group of robots 100,000 miles long and not one solid mass, would it still have a collective gravity like was suggested by Reed in Ultimate Extinction #1? How is that possible?
Every object in the universe has gravity. Anything that has matter. The way gravity is explain is that the earth pulls on you and you also pull on the earth, but since you are significantly smaller it doesn't effect the earth at all. And if the robots have an appropriate mass to them then yes they would have gravity.E said:I'm no science guy, but I was just wondering, if Gah Lak Tus is a group of robots 100,000 miles long and not one solid mass, would it still have a collective gravity like was suggested by Reed in Ultimate Extinction #1? How is that possible?
I understood this better than Houde's.Random said:Every object in the universe has gravity. Anything that has matter. The way gravity is explain is that the earth pulls on you and you also pull on the earth, but since you are significantly smaller it doesn't effect the earth at all. And if the robots have an appropriate mass to them then yes they would have gravity.
jtg3885 said:Where's that picture of a bunny with the pancake on his head when you really need it?
E.Vi.L. said:As I understand it, each robot has its own gravity.
They all pull each at other, so they would largely cancel each other. I guess they'd have a collective and detectable gravity field, but it couldn't be much stronger than that of an asteroid belt.
Well I guess so, something 100,000 miles long, depending on the density it does seem possible, but I doubt it. I thinkn they just heard that gravity is equal to the amount of mass and ran with it.E said:Yeah, so would it be enough to start ripping buildings apart?
They aren't that big - what are they, 30 feet? I can't remember where that was said but I'm pretty sure it was.
Nurhachi said:Well E, to answer your question, it depends on the rotation of the parameter on Gah Lak Tus's axis of its orbit. Comparing its size, density and location of squirrels to the Earths continuim quantum frequency. Take into consideration the probability of mass radiation transmorphication and the formation of cosmic dangles. This could play a huge part in the gravitational output.
Taking all this into account, the answer to your question is, in fact, Eleven.
I thought it was 42? Maybe I should check my math, but I'm pretty sure the answer is 42.ProjectX2 said:It's actually seventeen, you forgot to add the duey decimal system.
Random said:I thought it was 42? Maybe I should check my math, but I'm pretty sure the answer is 42.
Ahhh. Thank you.Random said:
Bass said:Actually, when E posed the question, I thought, "Well, essentially, the Earth is a bunch of molecules all next to each other. At the galaxy is many stars. If there were enough in close proximity, they'd create gravity."
Which is what Houde said. Makes perfect sense to me.
DIrishB said:This entire thread is strangely reminiscent of public education in America. Go U.S. of A. Whoo-hoo!