ourchair
Well-Known Member
Re: Dreamcasting 2009
Okay, Doom and I discussed some points and here are the two points where we differ, and that's not surprising because they are controversial proposals.
PROPOSAL 1: A season of Dreamcasting will begin with a thread where everyone who wants to participate, names three (3) properties they would like to see in the game. If a participant names a property, then they are beholden to use one of those three properties for the next round that they moderate... as is S.O.P when they win.
If a participant wants to name a property already named by another participant, they must choose something else instead. It doesn't matter anyway, because whoever named what doesn't matter. This serves as a laundry list of potential rounds and ensures there is variety.
In execution, that means even a game season where only four people participate, there are 12 possible round ideas. The actual purpose of this structure, is as mentioned, to ensure variety, so that we don't go monotonously scraping the bottom of the barrel or whatever.
It's a complicated sounding mechanism, but its really very simple. It also plays off the fact that people want to see rounds they wouldn't ordinarily cast themselves.
So for example Doom says, "Scalped, Fantastic Four, Northlanders." Ourchair can't pick any of those so he says, "DMZ, Desolation Jones and Civil War," Now, Ellis lovers like Moony must now resort to something else. If each person won once, then that's a maximum pool of 9 possible properties, instead of say, the old ways were everyone just wants to see the Avengers, and nobody gives a rat's *** about Godland.
However, Doom's counterpoint:
PROPOSAL 2: When the moderator specifies a cast, you may not add new characters to that cast, unless you kick someone out. In practice this means that if I named a Justice League round with the core seven, you can't say, introduce Booster Gold without having to kick say, Green Lantern or Wonder Woman out.
This is to prevent people from taking a round and going crazy with it, by trying to cast the entire damn franchise or property to the point where it just devolves into unappraisable mess.
Doom's counterpoint:
If your fantasy Spider-Man film needs to have Beetle as an important sidestory villain, then you CAN. You just gotta get rid of someone else, with the implicit understanding that either a) the character isnt in your story or b) Isn't too important enough to you that the actor who plays him is set in stone.
To wit:
Kindly structure your responses.
Okay, Doom and I discussed some points and here are the two points where we differ, and that's not surprising because they are controversial proposals.
PROPOSAL 1: A season of Dreamcasting will begin with a thread where everyone who wants to participate, names three (3) properties they would like to see in the game. If a participant names a property, then they are beholden to use one of those three properties for the next round that they moderate... as is S.O.P when they win.
If a participant wants to name a property already named by another participant, they must choose something else instead. It doesn't matter anyway, because whoever named what doesn't matter. This serves as a laundry list of potential rounds and ensures there is variety.
In execution, that means even a game season where only four people participate, there are 12 possible round ideas. The actual purpose of this structure, is as mentioned, to ensure variety, so that we don't go monotonously scraping the bottom of the barrel or whatever.
It's a complicated sounding mechanism, but its really very simple. It also plays off the fact that people want to see rounds they wouldn't ordinarily cast themselves.
So for example Doom says, "Scalped, Fantastic Four, Northlanders." Ourchair can't pick any of those so he says, "DMZ, Desolation Jones and Civil War," Now, Ellis lovers like Moony must now resort to something else. If each person won once, then that's a maximum pool of 9 possible properties, instead of say, the old ways were everyone just wants to see the Avengers, and nobody gives a rat's *** about Godland.
However, Doom's counterpoint:
Valid point, but I'm hoping people aren't that silly. What do you think?I think this kinda takes away the surprise of what the next round might be or possibly sway the vote of the round to someone who might not normally win or doesn't have the best cast just so we can get to the next round.
For example: Bluebeast says he's gonna do a Dark Avengers round. The current round is Runaways and Bluebeast cast Malcom MacDowell as Chase Stein. Now while that idea is toally ****ing awesome and you know it----it's obviously not the best cast and people are voting for him just so we can get a Dark Avengers round.
PROPOSAL 2: When the moderator specifies a cast, you may not add new characters to that cast, unless you kick someone out. In practice this means that if I named a Justice League round with the core seven, you can't say, introduce Booster Gold without having to kick say, Green Lantern or Wonder Woman out.
This is to prevent people from taking a round and going crazy with it, by trying to cast the entire damn franchise or property to the point where it just devolves into unappraisable mess.
Doom's counterpoint:
I think Doom misunderstands me here. You CAN cast obscure characters, you just have to kick someone else out. The understanding is that you've swapped someone else out for someone more important to YOUR Dreamcast.Hmmm. That I'm not too crazy about. Mostly because I've seen rounds that require me to cast someone that I feel may not work in a story or film adaptation.
Case in point: Superman Round. How many people cast Metallo or Parasite? I never asked for them to cast them because I thought they wouldn't serve a purpose in my film. But others are tempted to cast out of pure fanboyism.
If your fantasy Spider-Man film needs to have Beetle as an important sidestory villain, then you CAN. You just gotta get rid of someone else, with the implicit understanding that either a) the character isnt in your story or b) Isn't too important enough to you that the actor who plays him is set in stone.
To wit:
So what do you think?ourchair said:This probably isn't as useful a rule for rounds set to have small casts, but it's a common instance for people to set a cast and then someone casts 17 characters, which I think is kind of insane. So, this is a rule built mostly to keep people from going overboard past a cast that may have already been big.
(Like, I don't want someone to do an Avengers round and set Cap, Thor, Hawkeye, Iron Man, Black Widow, Hank Pym, Wasp, Hulk, and then suddenly people are casting everybody else who has been an Avenger, just cause THEY CAN.)
Subjectively speaking (and on a minor point) I think it is also difficult for people to really be expected to assess multiple sprawling casts, especially when you consider that most people's brains break down after the first nine characters. Worse, some rounds have seen people going I like Big-*** Cast A, but I chose Big-*** Cast B because of Arbitrary Deciding Factor that really doesn't say anything about why one wins over the other.
Kindly structure your responses.
Last edited: