Search results for query: *

  • Users: Rman
  • Order by date
  1. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I’m not saying the wiki is always wrong and some of their placements are fine. But looking at how they handled placing the shows on the Disney+ timeline, they just copied and pasted. I’ve been in the middle of a rewatch of the Netflix series and to be honest it was a struggle placing stuff like...
  2. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I mean the head of Marvel Television not already having an idea of that is pretty telling. I think it does show the lack of consideration they've had for them. But we really shouldn't be surprised since when it came to the Netflix shows they just blindly followed the wiki.
  3. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Not surprised really.
  4. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    The One-Shot gives March 1946 dates while the show begins in April 1946. So, no matter what it would be before it. Plus if I'm remembering correctly the show used shots from the one-shot in the montage of Peggy’s past.
  5. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    And like I said Feige and Markus and McFeely being involved probably help. To this day I still believe Whedon leaving after Age of Ultron (on top of Feige separating from Perlmutter) is part of the reason AoS became more isolated as the show no longer had that connection with the movies.
  6. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    For the moment, I do think it’s the easiest to add in given it’s a prequel to the majority of the MCU and the only real contradiction is the one shot. But people already headcanon that SHIELD was put on hold causing Peggy to go back to the SSR. I think Feige having somewhat of a role along with...
  7. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Agent Carter was the one show Feige was actually involved with. It’s not too surprising he’s taking from it before stuff like AoS. Plus James D'Arcy was already in Endgame and there’s talk he’ll be in VisionQuest.
  8. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Like I’ve said there’s reasoning behind both and I feel it’s up to the individual to decide which works best for them.
  9. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I don’t recall anyone saying the scene shouldn’t be added.
  10. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Yeah, I get that. I believe Sony and Marvel Studios are taking two different approaches when it comes to the Multiverse, even if it kinda contradicts the crossover between the two. I’m hopeful that Marvel is more clear in the future as they close out the Multiverse Saga.
  11. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Not in a way that it trumps how Marvel Studios sees their multiverse. If Sony wants to say 199999 while Marvel Studios says 616, I’m going to go with the people actually responsible for these productions.
  12. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I honestly have a wait and see what Marvel Studios does with it approach. I do feel there’s a lack of communication from Sony and Marvel Studios on what they’re doing with the multiverse which is why Sony sees the MCU as 199999. Even if Marvel Studios does not. It would be nice if they played...
  13. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I still personally believe the reasoning is Marvel Studios wanting to see their multiverse as separate and therefore for them it’s easy to say they’re 616 as they’re not considering the comics. I just don’t see why they would use it if they were taking the comics into consideration. But that’s...
  14. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Even without 838, you still have Selvig, the TVA, the timeline book, D&W’s title card for the scene with Happy, etc. all showing 616. I think it’s clear that whether you want to agree or not Marvel Studios wants people to see their universe as Earth-616.
  15. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    If he didn't see his own universe as 616, I'm sure it would be much clearer than niche comics. TBH, we have no idea what involvement he actually had in them. If he really saw his universe as 199999, he easily could have it referred as such the numerous times we've seen this universe be given a...
  16. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Given this is Marvel Studios's universe, my take now is to personally use the numbering they give us. I feel like if Feige really saw his universe as 199999, it would be made clear and I just can't ignore when we've been shown numerous times that they see their main universe as 616. Now if that...
  17. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I'd personally lean more towards September just because the MCU has always had him start there, but I'm open to August if a majority would prefer it.
  18. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    Just having a discussion. I don’t see the issue.
  19. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I’m just saying there isn’t any difference. “We got a guy who jumps, we got a guy who swings, we got a guy who crawls up the walls” makes it sound like it’s three different people. I’m not saying it wasn’t meant to be a specific reference, but I believe Peter would have said he’d had his powers...
  20. R

    Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 3)

    I honestly don’t think it was specific enough that it has to be a Spider-Man reference and for me I feel like you’re creating a hurdle in the reference of time just to make it work. The Jessica Jones thing is different as I believe fully well it was meant to be set around Fall 2018, but...
Back
Top