Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 4)

FruityWho50 said:
Weird timeline nitpick, but the pardon given to bullseye by Vanessa days before he killed foggy has an April on it and the one year ago from last episode which is either late march or early April 2027, would mean that the attack on Josie's bar would have happened In march/April of 2026.

Which doesn't add up with the previous episodes timeline of events which points to the attack on Josie's being in late October/Early November 2025 which Karen says was a year and a half ago in the finale sooo if we look at all of the evidence from the show.

Almost exactly a year since Fisk is elected mayor of NYC (Roughly Late October/Early November 2026 due to odd election schedule)

Ep 2 is set on New Year Day 2027

After secret invasion (Nov 2025) because of skrull reference in ep 4

Hope Van Dyne reference in Eps 2 & 9 meaning set after Quantumania (July 2025)

In Ep 1 Prologue, Karen says the police force has declined after 2 years most likely due to the blip (Oct 2023)

In Ep 1 Matt attends Bullseyes sentencing (January 2027)

Ep 5 is set on Saint Patrick's day (17th March 2027)

Ep 9 Karen says she found foggys dismissal case for dumb Benny from a year and a half ago
(Late March/Early April 2027) that gives us late September/early October 2025 which is close but not quite perfect as Fisk says it's almost been a year exactly since foggys death when he was close to winning the election which we estimated to late October/Early November and it doesn't work with Vanessa's meeting with the mob bosses as she mentions the earnings from last month meaning it's early in the month as Fisk is thinking about running for mayor.

So overall foggys death is definitely either very late October or between the 1-4th November 2025

Btw loved the finale and the show as a whole and I swear if we don't get the complete defenders cast back for season two I'm gonna very disappointed
Click to expand...
the april date here is referring to
the date bullseye was first convicted of his crimes, april 2018 i would assume
 
iceman109 said:
I think @JudgeDreddpool has a problem with the way it's presented because while Punisher and Daredevil display the gore as disturbing to watch Terrifier is more exploitive in its portrayal
Click to expand...
In that case, it still describes the average horror film. There's a reason Dead Meat is so popular as a YouTuber. I'm not trying to make anyone watch anything, but usually your imagination about how something plays out in a film is worse and more disturbing than the actual film. I know a friend who got into Saw because of me and they expected it to just be "disgusting" and "gore porn" but ended up loving it and the traps became really exciting. A similar thing happened to me for Terrifier 3 regarding the rat scene. Sounds disgusting, but it's manageable in reality.

Not everyone is the same though, I get that. I'm just saying, when you haven't seen something for yourself and you have a preconceived notion about what it'll be like, you don't know that you can't handle it. I'm not saying to watch it, I'm saying not to make assumptions without having seen it. Ash vs Evil Dead is pretty much just a gory as Terrifier, if not more.
 
Last edited:
Pro Bot said:
Honestly?

I think Agent Orange's death in Punisher was worse than this. He literally had his eyes gouged out. This isn't really like Terrifier either (which is cartoonishly gory, like Fallout). It's more like Saw if anything. Maybe a low tier Mortal Kombat fatality. The reviewers overhyped the gore in this episode, made it sound like heads would explode or something but nah, just squeezing the skull for a bit then ripping the jaw off. I mean, it's violent yes.
Click to expand...
Ehhh, disagree with this as a whole. Also, eyegouge ain't all that gory for me, especially that one scene from Blade Runner.
Pro Bot said:
Also, gore doesn't make something good or bad. Gore serves the story first, and I feel they did this and added an absurd amount of CGI blood in order to say "see? We're like Netflix!" because a few people were worried about that.
Click to expand...
Well, duh. Good gore cannot save a movie if the story is utter tosh. Look at Saw 3D or any of the other movies pre-Saw X. All of them sucked ass storywise.
Pro Bot said:
Good episode, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying it's bad. This is just my extended thoughts on specifically the violence in the series, which I had no problem with but I just don't think it's a big deal.

I also don't understand how this happening in Daredevil (a show which you do want to watch) shows me that you don't want to watch Terrifier. You've probably seen worse than this in, like, Evil Dead or something.
Click to expand...
Nah, Evil Dead (only seen the first three movies currently, plus most of the comics), even with all the graphic content, is pretty tame by today's standards. Something like Allie's death in Terrifier 2 is beyond fucked up and edges into torture porn territory.
iceman109 said:
I think @JudgeDreddpool has a problem with the way it's presented because while Punisher and Daredevil display the gore as disturbing to watch Terrifier is more exploitive in its portrayal
Click to expand...
This. I don't mind certain movies that are too gory, but Terrifier crosses too many lines for me to even enjoy as a horror fan. Again, that's just my personal preference.
Pro Bot said:
In that case, it still describes the average horror film. There's a reason Dead Meat is so popular as a YouTuber. I'm not trying to make anyone watch anything, but usually your imagination about how something plays out in a film is worse and more disturbing than the actual film. I know a friend who got into Saw because of me and they expected it to just be "disgusting" and "gore porn" but ended up loving it and the traps became really exciting. A similar thing happened to me for Terrifier 3 regarding the rat scene. Sounds disgusting, but it's manageable in reality.
Click to expand...
And honestly, there's a reason I'll usually watch Dead Meat do a Kill Count of the Terrifier movies over the actual movies themselves. Same for if they ever cover The Sadness, which currently is the closest we'll get to a live-action Crossed movie... that isn't until Garth Ennis' movie adaptation comes out.

Again, no hate if you like Terrifier, but I'm not gonna get into it. That's all I gotta say. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some pizza awaiting me.
 
I think Thunderbolts* will be in late 2027, in October-November 2027, after S2 of Born Again, which I think will start right after the end of S1, in April 2027 and will go until mid-2027. For me, it doesn't need to be in May 2027. Just being in the year of the 15th anniversary of Battle of New York is enough. The gala event that will be in the movie is to honor the heroes, and not a gala to celebrate 15 years of Battle of NY, but that's just my opinion. Bucky is still campaigning as a congressman in April 2027, as we saw in BNW. I think Doomsday and Secret Wars will be in 2028, 10 years after Infinity War. I think Fantastic Four: First Steps will be in October-November 1964 (60s Earth), based on Halloween decorations.
 
It's been stated multiple times before
The first poster ever shown of the characters even has a photo of Ben referencing Neil Armstrong's, which was taken in 1969
 
iceman109 said:
How we do we know that it's an alternate 1964, Is it also possible that it's just an alternate modern day?
Click to expand...
ew.com

Welcome to the (retro)future: Inside the Fantastic Four's 'first steps' into the MCU

'The Fantastic Four: First Steps: stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach, and director Matt Shakman share details about the upcoming Marvel superhero film — and why it's different from what you've seen before.
ew.com ew.com

"So the new film will be set in the '60s — just not our '60s."
 
I have a theory/headcanon, that DP&W's Wolverine and older X-23/Laura could prevent Xavier's Alzheimer's seizure by giving him early treatment or something, starting in 2024, after the events of DP&W, to not causing the Xavier's incident, since Laura knows about the Weischester's incident of 2028, mentioned in Logan. Also they go after Transigen organization very early, with X-Men, before 2029, they will also save young X-23 early too. The events of Logan will not happen, will become a timeline branch. Also, this new Wolverine, who replaced and merged with the original Logan from Earth-10005, because he is one of responsible to regenerate/save the Earth-10005 with Deadpool, similar to what happened at the end of DOFP, Original Timeline's Wolverine mind take over Revised Timeline's Wolverine body, does not have the Adamantium poisoning problem that affected his healing factor. This is unique to FoX-Men/Earth-10005 Wolverine, since this new Wolverine is originally from another universe. All this happened because of Mr. Paradox.

In my headcanon, both X-Men: Dark Phoenix and The New Mutants are timeline branches of FoX-Men universe. So Mystique didn't die in 1992 in the main timeline, which explains why she's in Avengers: Doomsday, but we'll see what happens when the movie comes out.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if anyone else mentioned it here or I mentioned it if it was mentioned, but I think that the alternate Wolverine's arrival into 10005 diverged it into 17315
 
Do you think Monica Rambeau arrived in FoX-Men universe in 2026 or in 2024, after Deadpool & Wolverine?
 
myusernameyes said:
I don't know if anyone else mentioned it here or I mentioned it if it was mentioned, but I think that the alternate Wolverine's arrival into 10005 diverged it into 17315
Click to expand...
If anything, his arrival in Earth-17315* (10005 is as accurate as Earth-199999 being Earth-616 or Earth-1610B being Earth-1610) diverged it from Earth-17315.
 
Regsta said:
Do you think Monica Rambeau arrived in FoX-Men universe in 2026 or in 2024, after Deadpool & Wolverine?
Click to expand...
Like, I think Monica arrived before the events of DP&W in 2024 (2026 in MCU, as seen in The Marvels), then in late 2024 is the events of Deadpool & Wolverine.
 
I think when X-Men in show up in Doomsday, they are in 2025 in their universe and MCU will be in 2028, they have different current years, I don't know if make sense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top